STI-associated syndromes guide: Pelvic inflammatory disease

This guide provides an overview of the management and empiric treatment of sexually transmitted infection (STI) - associated pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), which is an infection of the upper genital tract involving the endometrium, fallopian tubes, pelvic peritoneum or contiguous structures. Parenteral treatment and the management of PID requiring hospitalization are beyond the scope of this guide.

On this page:

Public health importance

PID is the most common infectious cause of lower abdominal pain in femalesFootnote 1. Up to two-thirds of cases may not be recognized.

In Canada, there are approximately 100,000 cases of symptomatic PID diagnosed annually. In addition, it is estimated that 10%-15% of reproductive-aged females have had at least one episode of PIDFootnote 2.

Long-term sequelae of PID include infertility, ectopic pregnancy and chronic pelvic pain. The likelihood of developing these long-term sequelae is related to the number of PID episodes the person has experiencedFootnote 3.

Common STI-associated etiology

PID can be a complicated polymicrobial infection. Etiologic agents associated with PID may include sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and endogenous anaerobic and facultative (aerobic) bacteria.

In most cases, the specific microbial etiology of PID is unknown and no specific organism is identified. Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) are the most identified STIs in cases of PID. CT, GC and Mycoplasma genitalium account for an estimated 30%-40% of casesFootnote 4.

Approximately 15% of persons with endocervical GC or CT develop PID Footnote 5Footnote 6Footnote 7.

Other possible infectious causes: Trichomonas vaginalis, Gardnerella vaginalis, Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Bacteroides spp., Peptostreptococcus spp., Prevotella spp., Streptococcus spp., Escherichia coli and Haemophilus influenzaFootnote 8.

Clinical manifestations

Symptoms and signs of PID include:

GC-associated PID tends to be clinically more severe than CT-associated PIDFootnote 4Footnote 9.

Diagnostic testing

Abdominal and pelvic examination is indicated for individuals presenting with symptoms of PID, including:

Consider and rule out an ectopic pregnancy.

Recommended testing:

Other tests that may be helpful in the diagnosis of acute PID include: complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, endometrial biopsy, transvaginal sonography and laparoscopy.

Minimum diagnostic criteria:

Additional diagnostic criteria:

Definitive diagnostic criteria:

Empiric treatment and management

Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial to maintain fertility. Due to the polymicrobial nature of the infection, empiric treatment regimens include broad-spectrum coverage for the most likely etiologic agents such as STI, facultative bacteria and streptococciFootnote 12.

Outpatient treatment for PID

Regimen AFootnote 13

Regimen B

Ceftriaxone 250 mg IM in a single dose plus Doxycycline 100 mg PO BID for 14 days [A-II]

plus or minus

Metronidazole 500 mg PO BID for 14 days [B-III]

Levofloxacin 500 mg PO once a day for 14 days

plus or minus

Metronidazole 500 mg PO BID for 14 days [B-II]

Notes:

The management of people with PID is not adequate unless sexual partners are also evaluated and treated.

Hospitalization is indicated in the following circumstances:

PID is not an indication for intrauterine device (IUD) removalFootnote 19. If IUD removal is planned, delay removal until at least two doses of antibiotics have been administered.

Follow-up

Evaluate response to treatment after 2-3 daysFootnote 18. If there is no clinical improvement, consider consulting an experienced colleague. Hospitalization may be necessary for further investigation, parenteral therapy and observation. Consider other differential or mixed diagnoses and a laparoscopy.

The need for test of cure (TOC) depends on which pathogen is confirmed by laboratory testing. Refer to the etiology-specific guide.

In persons with persistent or recurrent PID, consider NAAT testing for M. genitalium, including antibiotic susceptibility (where available). If testing is not available, consider empiric treatment for M. genitalium. Refer to Mycoplasma genitalium guide.

Reporting and partner notification

When treatment is indicated for an STI: notify, evaluate, test and treat (as appropriate) sexual partners. Refer to the etiology-specific guide(s) for guidance on reporting and partner notification.

References

Footnote 1

Eschenbach DA. Epidemiology and diagnosis of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Obstet Gynecol 1980 May;55(5 Suppl):142S-153S.

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Footnote 2

Aral SO, Mosher WD, Cates W. Self-reported pelvic inflammatory disease in the United States, 1988. JAMA 1991;266(18):2570-2573.

Return to footnote 2 referrer

Footnote 3

Westrom L, Joesoef R, Reynolds G, Hagdu A, Thompson SE. Pelvic inflammatory disease and fertility. A cohort study of 1,844 women with laparoscopically verified disease and 657 control women with normal laparoscopic results. Sex Transm Dis 1992 19(4):185-192.

Return to footnote 3 referrer

Footnote 4

Ross J. Pelvic inflammatory disease: Pathogenesis, microbiology, and risk factors. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/pelvic-inflammatory-diseasepathogenesis-microbiology-and-risk-factors 2019.

Return to footnote 4 referrer

Footnote 5

Ness RB, Kip KE, Hillier SL, et al. A cluster analysis of bacterial vaginosis-associated microflora and pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Epidemiol 2005;162(6):585-590.

Return to footnote 5 referrer

Footnote 6

Haggerty CL, Totten PA, Astete SG, Ness RB. Mycoplasma genitalium among women with nongonococcal, nonchlamydial pelvic inflammatory disease. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2006;2006:30184.

Return to footnote 6 referrer

Footnote 7

Short VL, Totten PA, Ness RB, Astete SG, Kelsey SF, Haggerty CL. Clinical presentation of Mycoplasma genitalium infection versus Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection among women with pelvic inflammatory disease. Clin Infect Dis 2009;48(1):41-47.

Return to footnote 7 referrer

Footnote 8

Cox E, Sowah LA. XII. Approach to Sexually Transmitted Infections. Essentials of clinical infectious diseases/editor, William F.Wright. 2018:320.

Return to footnote 8 referrer

Footnote 9

Reekie J, Donovan B, Guy R, et al. Risk of pelvic inflammatory disease in relation to chlamydia and gonorrhea testing, repeat testing, and positivity: a population-based cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(3):437-443.

Return to footnote 9 referrer

Footnote 10

Elias J, Frosch M, Vogel U. Neisseria. In: Jorgensen J, Pfaller M, Carroll K, Funke G, Landry M, Richter S, et al, editors. Manual of clinical microbiology. 11th ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2015. p. 635-651.

Return to footnote 10 referrer

Footnote 11

Kiviat NB, Wolner-Hanssen P, Eschenbach DA, Wasserheit JN, Paavonen JA, Bell TA, et al. Endometrial histopathology in patients with culture-proved upper genital tract infection and laparoscopically diagnosed acute salpingitis. Am J Surg Pathol 1990; 14(2):167-175.

Return to footnote 11 referrer

Footnote 12

Walker CK, Kahn JG, Washington AE, Peterson HB, Sweet RL. Pelvic inflammatory disease: metaanalysis of antimicrobial regimen efficacy. J Infect Dis 1993; 168(4):969-978.

Return to footnote 12 referrer

Footnote 13

Walker CK, Workowski KA, Washington AE, Soper D, Sweet RL. Anaerobes in pelvic inflammatory disease: implications for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's guidelines for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 28 Suppl 1:S29-36.

Return to footnote 13 referrer

Footnote 14

Peipert JF, Sweet RL, Walker CK, Kahn J, Rielly-Gauvin K. Evaluation of ofloxacin in the treatment of laparoscopically documented acute pelvic inflammatory disease (salpingitis). Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 1999;7(3):138-144.

Return to footnote 14 referrer

Footnote 15

Ross JD, Cronje HS, Paszkowski T, et al. Moxifloxacin versus ofloxacin plus metronidazole in uncomplicated pelvic inflammatory disease: results of a multicentre, double blind, randomised trial. Sex Transm Infect 2006 Dec;82(6):446-451.

Return to footnote 15 referrer

Footnote 16

Arredondo JL, Diaz V, Gaitan H, et al. Oral clindamycin and ciprofloxacin versus intramuscular ceftriaxone and oral doxycycline in the treatment of mild-to-moderate pelvic inflammatory disease in outpatients. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24(2):170-178.

Return to footnote 16 referrer

Footnote 17

Martens MG, Gordon S, Yarborough DR, Faro S, Binder D, Berkeley A. Multicenter randomized trial of ofloxacin versus cefoxitin and doxycycline in outpatient treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease. Ambulatory PID Research Group. South Med J 1993; 86(6):604-610.

Return to footnote 17 referrer

Footnote 18

Cunningham FG, Hauth JC, Strong JD, et al. Evaluation of tetracycline or penicillin and ampicillin for treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 1977; 296(24):1380-1383.

Return to footnote 18 referrer

Footnote 19

Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2013: adapted from the World Health Organization selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2nd edition. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2013;62(RR-05):1-60.

Return to footnote 19 referrer

Page details

Date modified: