STI-associated syndromes guide: Pelvic inflammatory disease
This guide provides an overview of the management and empiric treatment of sexually transmitted infection (STI) - associated pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), which is an infection of the upper genital tract involving the endometrium, fallopian tubes, pelvic peritoneum or contiguous structures. Parenteral treatment and the management of PID requiring hospitalization are beyond the scope of this guide.
On this page:
- Public health importance
- Common STI-associated etiology
- Clinical manifestations
- Diagnostic testing
- Empiric treatment and management
- Follow-up
- Reporting and partner notification
- References
Public health importance
PID is the most common infectious cause of lower abdominal pain in femalesFootnote 1. Up to two-thirds of cases may not be recognized.
In Canada, there are approximately 100,000 cases of symptomatic PID diagnosed annually. In addition, it is estimated that 10%-15% of reproductive-aged females have had at least one episode of PIDFootnote 2.
Long-term sequelae of PID include infertility, ectopic pregnancy and chronic pelvic pain. The likelihood of developing these long-term sequelae is related to the number of PID episodes the person has experiencedFootnote 3.
Common STI-associated etiology
PID can be a complicated polymicrobial infection. Etiologic agents associated with PID may include sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and endogenous anaerobic and facultative (aerobic) bacteria.
In most cases, the specific microbial etiology of PID is unknown and no specific organism is identified. Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) are the most identified STIs in cases of PID. CT, GC and Mycoplasma genitalium account for an estimated 30%-40% of casesFootnote 4.
Approximately 15% of persons with endocervical GC or CT develop PID Footnote 5Footnote 6Footnote 7.
Other possible infectious causes: Trichomonas vaginalis, Gardnerella vaginalis, Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Bacteroides spp., Peptostreptococcus spp., Prevotella spp., Streptococcus spp., Escherichia coli and Haemophilus influenzaFootnote 8.
Clinical manifestations
Symptoms and signs of PID include:
- Adnexal tenderness
- Cervical motion tenderness
- Fever > 38.3°C
- Abdominal tenderness
GC-associated PID tends to be clinically more severe than CT-associated PIDFootnote 4Footnote 9.
Diagnostic testing
Abdominal and pelvic examination is indicated for individuals presenting with symptoms of PID, including:
- Speculum and bimanual exam
- Inspection of external genital area, vagina and cervix
Consider and rule out an ectopic pregnancy.
Recommended testing:
- Pregnancy test
- Endocervical swab for nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) for CT and GC, plus culture for GC (where available)
- Vaginal swabs or first-void urine are also appropriate specimens for NAAT
- Vaginal swabs for culture to detect GC are not recommendedFootnote 10
- Vaginal swabs for bacterial vaginosis and Trichomonas vaginalis detection (consult your local laboratory for availability)
- Pelvic ultrasound, particularly if tubo-ovarian abscess or ectopic pregnancy are suspected
Other tests that may be helpful in the diagnosis of acute PID include: complete blood count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, endometrial biopsy, transvaginal sonography and laparoscopy.
Minimum diagnostic criteria:
- Adnexal tenderness
- Cervical motion tenderness
- Lower abdominal tenderness
Additional diagnostic criteria:
- Oral temperature >38.3°C
- Presence of white blood cells in vaginal secretions on wet mount or Gram stain
- Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate or elevated C-reactive protein
- Laboratory documentation of cervical infection with GC, CT or M. genitalium
Definitive diagnostic criteria:
- Endometrial biopsy with histopathologic evidence of endometritisFootnote 11
- Transvaginal sonography or other imaging techniques showing thickened fluid-filled tubes, with or without free pelvic fluid or tubo-ovarian complex
- Gold standard: Laparoscopy demonstrating abnormalities consistent with PID, such as fallopian tube erythema or mucopurulent exudates
Empiric treatment and management
Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial to maintain fertility. Due to the polymicrobial nature of the infection, empiric treatment regimens include broad-spectrum coverage for the most likely etiologic agents such as STI, facultative bacteria and streptococciFootnote 12.
Outpatient treatment for PID | |
---|---|
Regimen AFootnote 13 |
Regimen B |
Ceftriaxone 250 mg IM in a single dose plus Doxycycline 100 mg PO BID for 14 days [A-II] plus or minus Metronidazole 500 mg PO BID for 14 days [B-III] |
Levofloxacin 500 mg PO once a day for 14 days plus or minus Metronidazole 500 mg PO BID for 14 days [B-II] |
Notes:
- Consider adding metronidazole to provide anaerobic coverage for people who are acutely ill (fever, chills and toxicity) or who have bacterial vaginosisFootnote 14.
- Quinolones are effective in treating acute PID that is not caused by quinolone-resistant GCFootnote 15Footnote 16Footnote 17.
- Consult an experienced colleague when there are contraindications to the recommended treatments.
The management of people with PID is not adequate unless sexual partners are also evaluated and treated.
Hospitalization is indicated in the following circumstances:
- Surgical emergencies such as appendicitis or ectopic pregnancy or tubo-ovarian abscess cannot be ruled out
- Pregnancy: Although PID in pregnancy is not common especially after the first trimester, there is an increased risk of adverse outcomes for both the person and the pregnancy
- Severe pain, illness, nausea, vomiting or high fever
- No clinical response to outpatient treatment regimen 2-3 days after initiationFootnote 18
- Inability to follow or tolerate oral treatment regimen
- Immunocompromised
PID is not an indication for intrauterine device (IUD) removalFootnote 19. If IUD removal is planned, delay removal until at least two doses of antibiotics have been administered.
Follow-up
Evaluate response to treatment after 2-3 daysFootnote 18. If there is no clinical improvement, consider consulting an experienced colleague. Hospitalization may be necessary for further investigation, parenteral therapy and observation. Consider other differential or mixed diagnoses and a laparoscopy.
The need for test of cure (TOC) depends on which pathogen is confirmed by laboratory testing. Refer to the etiology-specific guide.
In persons with persistent or recurrent PID, consider NAAT testing for M. genitalium, including antibiotic susceptibility (where available). If testing is not available, consider empiric treatment for M. genitalium. Refer to Mycoplasma genitalium guide.
Reporting and partner notification
When treatment is indicated for an STI: notify, evaluate, test and treat (as appropriate) sexual partners. Refer to the etiology-specific guide(s) for guidance on reporting and partner notification.
References
- Footnote 1
-
Eschenbach DA. Epidemiology and diagnosis of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. Obstet Gynecol 1980 May;55(5 Suppl):142S-153S.
- Footnote 2
-
Aral SO, Mosher WD, Cates W. Self-reported pelvic inflammatory disease in the United States, 1988. JAMA 1991;266(18):2570-2573.
- Footnote 3
-
Westrom L, Joesoef R, Reynolds G, Hagdu A, Thompson SE. Pelvic inflammatory disease and fertility. A cohort study of 1,844 women with laparoscopically verified disease and 657 control women with normal laparoscopic results. Sex Transm Dis 1992 19(4):185-192.
- Footnote 4
-
Ross J. Pelvic inflammatory disease: Pathogenesis, microbiology, and risk factors. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/pelvic-inflammatory-diseasepathogenesis-microbiology-and-risk-factors 2019.
- Footnote 5
-
Ness RB, Kip KE, Hillier SL, et al. A cluster analysis of bacterial vaginosis-associated microflora and pelvic inflammatory disease. Am J Epidemiol 2005;162(6):585-590.
- Footnote 6
-
Haggerty CL, Totten PA, Astete SG, Ness RB. Mycoplasma genitalium among women with nongonococcal, nonchlamydial pelvic inflammatory disease. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2006;2006:30184.
- Footnote 7
-
Short VL, Totten PA, Ness RB, Astete SG, Kelsey SF, Haggerty CL. Clinical presentation of Mycoplasma genitalium infection versus Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection among women with pelvic inflammatory disease. Clin Infect Dis 2009;48(1):41-47.
- Footnote 8
-
Cox E, Sowah LA. XII. Approach to Sexually Transmitted Infections. Essentials of clinical infectious diseases/editor, William F.Wright. 2018:320.
- Footnote 9
-
Reekie J, Donovan B, Guy R, et al. Risk of pelvic inflammatory disease in relation to chlamydia and gonorrhea testing, repeat testing, and positivity: a population-based cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66(3):437-443.
- Footnote 10
-
Elias J, Frosch M, Vogel U. Neisseria. In: Jorgensen J, Pfaller M, Carroll K, Funke G, Landry M, Richter S, et al, editors. Manual of clinical microbiology. 11th ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2015. p. 635-651.
- Footnote 11
-
Kiviat NB, Wolner-Hanssen P, Eschenbach DA, Wasserheit JN, Paavonen JA, Bell TA, et al. Endometrial histopathology in patients with culture-proved upper genital tract infection and laparoscopically diagnosed acute salpingitis. Am J Surg Pathol 1990; 14(2):167-175.
- Footnote 12
-
Walker CK, Kahn JG, Washington AE, Peterson HB, Sweet RL. Pelvic inflammatory disease: metaanalysis of antimicrobial regimen efficacy. J Infect Dis 1993; 168(4):969-978.
- Footnote 13
-
Walker CK, Workowski KA, Washington AE, Soper D, Sweet RL. Anaerobes in pelvic inflammatory disease: implications for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's guidelines for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 28 Suppl 1:S29-36.
- Footnote 14
-
Peipert JF, Sweet RL, Walker CK, Kahn J, Rielly-Gauvin K. Evaluation of ofloxacin in the treatment of laparoscopically documented acute pelvic inflammatory disease (salpingitis). Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 1999;7(3):138-144.
- Footnote 15
-
Ross JD, Cronje HS, Paszkowski T, et al. Moxifloxacin versus ofloxacin plus metronidazole in uncomplicated pelvic inflammatory disease: results of a multicentre, double blind, randomised trial. Sex Transm Infect 2006 Dec;82(6):446-451.
- Footnote 16
-
Arredondo JL, Diaz V, Gaitan H, et al. Oral clindamycin and ciprofloxacin versus intramuscular ceftriaxone and oral doxycycline in the treatment of mild-to-moderate pelvic inflammatory disease in outpatients. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24(2):170-178.
- Footnote 17
-
Martens MG, Gordon S, Yarborough DR, Faro S, Binder D, Berkeley A. Multicenter randomized trial of ofloxacin versus cefoxitin and doxycycline in outpatient treatment of pelvic inflammatory disease. Ambulatory PID Research Group. South Med J 1993; 86(6):604-610.
- Footnote 18
-
Cunningham FG, Hauth JC, Strong JD, et al. Evaluation of tetracycline or penicillin and ampicillin for treatment of acute pelvic inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 1977; 296(24):1380-1383.
- Footnote 19
-
Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2013: adapted from the World Health Organization selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2nd edition. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2013;62(RR-05):1-60.
Page details
- Date modified: