STI-associated syndromes guide: Anogenital ulcers

This guide provides an overview of the management and empiric treatment of sexually transmitted infection (STI) - associated anogenital ulcers, which are characterised by vesicular, pustular, erosive, ulcerative, or crusted anogenital lesion(s) with or without regional lymphadenopathy.

On this page:

Public health importance

A United States of America (US) study found that more than half of genital ulcers were due to Herpes simplex virus type 1 or 2 (HSV-1 or HSV-2)Footnote 1. Genital herpes is a chronic infection characterized by recurrences and asymptomatic shedding. HSV-1 and HSV-2 can be transmitted vertically during pregnancy and deliveryFootnote 2Footnote 3 and neonatal herpes can cause serious morbidity (including long-term neurological and developmental sequelae) and results in high mortalityFootnote 4Footnote 5Footnote 6.

Syphilis may also cause anogenital ulcers at the site of inoculation. Left untreated, syphilis has many severe complications. It can be transmitted vertically during pregnancy and congenital syphilis may have severe consequences for newborns and be fatalFootnote 7. Even after treatment, a significantly higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes remains compared to pregnancies without syphilis infectionFootnote 8.

People with anogenital ulcers are at increased risk of acquiring or transmitting HIV Footnote 9Footnote 10 .

Common STI-associated etiology

Sexually transmitted infections (STI) associated with anogenital ulcers include:

Anogenital ulcers in young, sexually active people are most often associated with a sexually transmitted infection (STI)Footnote 1.

HSV-1 and HSV-2 have been found to account for more than half of STI-associated anogenital ulcersFootnote 1Footnote 12.

Rates of infectious syphilis have increased in Canada in recent years and outbreaks have been declared in most provinces and territories since 2017. Syphilis should be considered in people presenting with anogenital ulcers.

Lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) should also be considered as a cause of anogenital ulcers. Since 2004, there have been LGV outbreaks in Canada, mainly in gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM).

Mpox should be considered as a possible cause of anogenital ulcersFootnote 13. From April 28, 2022 until September 29, 2023, 1,515 cases of mpox were reported in Canada, disproportionately impacting gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM)Footnote 14Footnote 15Footnote 16.

Consider chancroid (Haemophilus ducreyi) and granuloma inguinale (Klebsiella granulomatis) in people who had sex while in an endemic area, in people with a sexual partner from an endemic area, and within outbreak situationsFootnote 17Footnote 18Footnote 19Footnote 20Footnote 21Footnote 22. Chancroid is a major cause of anogenital ulcers in sub-Saharan Africa and in many parts of Southeast Asia and Latin AmericaFootnote 23. Granuloma inguinale is endemic in some tropical and developing areas, including India, Papua New Guinea, the Caribbean, Central Australia and southern AfricaFootnote 24.

Anogenital ulcers may also be due to non-sexually transmitted fungal, viral or bacterial infections, as well as non-infectious skin and mucosal conditionsFootnote 17Footnote 18Footnote 19Footnote 20Footnote 21Footnote 22.

More than one etiology may be identified on evaluationFootnote 25.

Even after a complete diagnostic evaluation, at least 25% of people with anogenital ulcers have no laboratory-confirmed diagnosisFootnote 26.

Clinical manifestations

STI Appearance of ulcer(s) Site Other features

Genital herpes (HSV-1 or HSV-2)

  • Grouped vesicles or pustules evolving to superficial circular or coalescing ulcers on an erythematous base that may take a couple of weeks to scab over
  • Smooth margin and base
  • Anywhere in the "boxer short" area
  • Glans, prepuce, pubis, inguinal, penile shaft, cervix, vulva, vagina, perineum, anus, rectum, legs and buttocks
  • Incubation: 1-26 days with a median of 6-8 days for primary genital herpesFootnote 27
  • Ulcers usually painful or pruritic
  • Genital pain
  • Enlarged, non-fluctuant and tender inguinal lymph nodes (most common in primary infection)
  • Constitutional symptoms, such as fever, malaise and pharyngitis, are common with primary infection
  • Atypical presentations, such as linear fissures in the vulva or rectum
  • Recurrences, particularly with HSV-2

Primary syphilisFootnote 23

  • Papule evolving to a chancre
  • Indurated with serous exudates
  • Single ulcer in 70% of cases
  • Smooth margin and base
  • At site of inoculation
  • Internal genital tract, intra-anal and oral lesions may go unnoticed
  • Incubation: 3-90 days
  • Painless ulcer
  • Firm, enlarged, non-fluctuant, non-tender lymphadenopathy is common
  • Lesions may heal without treatment

LGV

  • Self-limited single papule, which may ulcerate
  • At site of inoculation (penis, rectum, vulva, vagina, oral cavity, occasionally cervix)
  • Incubation: 3-30 days
  • Painless ulcer
  • Most frequently seen in gbMSM presenting with rectal symptoms (proctitis)
  • Tender inguinal or femoral lymphadenopathy, mostly unilateral
  • Signs and symptoms of urethritis maybe present
  • If not treated, fibrosis can lead to fistulas, strictures and obstruction of the lymphatic drainage causing elephantiasis

Chancroid

  • Single or multiple necrotizing ulcer(s)
  • At site of inoculation
  • External genitalia, rarely in vagina or on cervix
  • Incubation: 5-14 days
  • Painful ulcers
  • Often painful swelling and suppuration of regional lymph nodes, with erythema and edema of overlying skin

Granuloma inguinale

  • Single or multiple progressive ulcerative lesions
  • Highly vascular (beefy red appearance)
  • Bleeds easily on contact
  • Hypertrophic, necrotic and sclerotic variants
  • At site of inoculation: usually in the genital, anal or groin regionsFootnote 29
  • Incubation: 1-180 days
  • Painless
  • Relapse can occur 6-18 months after apparently effective therapy
Mpox
  • Single or multiple macular, pustular, vesicular or crusted mucocutaneous lesionsFootnote 13Footnote 16Footnote 30
  • Lesions may progress from macules to papules to vesicles and then pustules, and then scab overFootnote 16Footnote 30
  • Lesions in the same area of the body tend to evolve synchronously
  • Atypical lesions and/or lesions in multiple phases can be present in different areas of the body simultaneouslyFootnote 13Footnote 16

Diagnostic testing

Minimum testing for cases of anogenital ulcers should include HSV-1 and HSV-2 and syphilisFootnote 26. Refer to etiology-specific Sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBI) Guide(s) for information on diagnostic testing and interpretation of results.

HSV-1 and HSV-2

Syphilis

Other tests

Empiric treatment and management

The decision to treat empirically or to wait for test results should reflect the:

Consider empiric treatment for genital herpesFootnote 26Footnote 41Footnote 42. The main treatment goals are to accelerate healing, prevent complications and reduce risk of transmissionFootnote 43. Refer to the Genital herpes guide for treatment recommendations.

In people with risk factors for syphilis or LGV and compatible presentations, consider empiric treatment if follow-up is uncertain. Refer to the Syphilis or Chlamydia (including LGV) guides for treatment recommendations, as appropriate.

Supportive care is a central part of mpox management as there is limited data on the clinical effectiveness of specific treatments for mpox infections in humansFootnote 16. Consult an infectious disease physician to discuss therapeutic options for suspected or confirmed casesFootnote 16.

Some existing treatments for smallpox, such as TPOXX (tecovirimat monohydrate capsules) may have a role to play in select instancesFootnote 16. TPOXX is an oral antiviral agent that is indicated for the treatment of human smallpox disease in adults and pediatric patients weighing at least 13 kg. It does not currently have an approved Health Canada indication for mpox or other OrthopoxvirusesFootnote 16. However, recommendations for its off-label use can be found at the following webpage: CADTH Health Technology Review on Tecovirimat (Tpoxx): Update.

Consider consulting an experienced colleague if chancroid or granuloma inguinale is suspected.

Follow-up

Arrange follow-up to provide test results, re-evaluate the person and confirm diagnosis.

The need for test of cure (TOC) depends on which pathogen is confirmed by laboratory testing. In the case of suspected or confirmed genital herpes, LGV or syphilis infection, consult etiology specific STBBI Guides for follow-up and test of cure recommendations.

Consider consulting an experienced colleague for the management, treatment and follow-up of suspected chancroid or granuloma inguinale.

Suspected or confirmed cases of mpox and their contacts should follow isolation recommendations as per your provincial, territorial or local public health authority.

Repeat HIV testing if initial testing was done during the window period.

Reporting and partner notification

When treatment is indicated for an STI, notify, evaluate, test and treat (as appropriate) sexual partners. Refer to the etiology-specific guide(s) for guidance on reporting and partner notification.

For suspected or confirmed cases of mpox, refer to provincial, territorial or local public health authority's reporting requirements and recommendations for contacts. For up-to-date guidance on pre-exposure and post-exposure vaccination for mpox, refer to the Canadian Immunization Guide or provincial and territorial vaccination schedules and guidelines.

Refer to local public health authority for information on reporting requirements and partner notification for chancroid and granuloma inguinale.

References

Footnote 1

Mertz KJ, Trees D, Levine WC, Lewis JS, Litchfield B, Pettus KS, et al. Etiology of genital ulcers and prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus coinfection in 10 US cities. The Genital Ulcer Disease Surveillance Group. J Infect Dis 1998;178(6):1795-1798.

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Footnote 2

Prober CG, Corey L, Brown ZA, et al. The management of pregnancies complicated by genital infections with herpes simplex virus. Clin Infect Dis 1992;15(6):1031-1038. 

Return to footnote 2 referrer

Footnote 3

Brown ZA, Benedetti J, Ashley R, Burchett S, Selke S, Berry S, et al. Neonatal herpes simplex virus infection in relation to asymptomatic maternal infection at the time of labor. N Engl J Med 1991;324(18):1247-1252.

Return to footnote 3 referrer

Footnote 4

Lopez-Medina E, Cantey JB, Sánchez PJ. The mortality of neonatal herpes simplex virus infection. J Pediatr 2015;166(6):1529-1532. e1.

Return to footnote 4 referrer

Footnote 5

Whitley RJ, Roizman B. Herpes simplex virus infections. The Lancet 2001;357(9267):1513-1518.

Return to footnote 5 referrer

Footnote 6

Kropp RY, Wong T, Cormier L, et al. Neonatal herpes simplex virus infections in Canada: results of a 3-year national prospective study. Pediatrics. 2006;117(6):1955-1962.

Return to footnote 6 referrer

Footnote 7

Finelli L, Berman SM, Koumans EH, Levine WC. Congenital syphilis. Bull World Health Organ 1998;76 Suppl 2:126-128.

Return to footnote 7 referrer

Footnote 8

Lumbiganon P, Piaggio G, Villar J, et al. The epidemiology of syphilis in pregnancy. Int J STD AIDS 2002;13(7):486-494.

Return to footnote 8 referrer

Footnote 9

Celum CL. The interaction between herpes simplex virus and human immunodeficiency virus. Herpes 2004;11 Suppl 1:36A-45A.

Return to footnote 9 referrer

Footnote 10

Wasserheit JN. Epidemiological synergy. Interrelationships between human immunodeficiency virus infection and other sexually transmitted diseases. Sex Transm Dis 1992;19(2):61-77.

Return to footnote 10 referrer

Footnote 11

Ulaeto D, Agafonov A, Burchfield J, Carter L, Happi C, Jakob R, Krpelanova E, Kuppalli K, Lefkowitz EJ, Mauldin MR, de Oliveira T, Onoja B, Otieno J, Rambaut A, Subissi L, Yinka-Ogunleye A, Lewis RF. New nomenclature for mpox (monkeypox) and monkeypox virus clades. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Mar;23(3):273-275. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00055-5.

Return to footnote 11 referrer

Footnote 12

Corey L, Holmes KK. Genital herpes simplex virus infections: current concepts in diagnosis, therapy, and prevention. Ann Intern Med. 1983;98(6):973-983. 

Return to footnote 12 referrer

Footnote 13

Thornhill JP, Barkati S, Walmsley S, Rockstroh J, Antinori A, Harrison LB, et al. Monkeypox Virus Infection in Humans across 16 Countries - April-June 2022. N Engl J Med. 2022 Aug 25;387(8):679-691. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2207323.

Return to footnote 13 referrer

Footnote 14

Health Infobase. Mpox (monkeypox) epidemiology update. 2023. Accessed 2023 November 17. Available from: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/mpox/#a5.

Return to footnote 14 referrer

Footnote 15

Milwid RM, Li M, Fazil A, Maheu-Giroux M, Doyle CM, Xia Y, Cox J, Grace D, Dvorakova M, Walker SC, Mishra S, Ogden NH. Exploring the dynamics of the 2022 mpox outbreak in Canada. J Med Virol. 2023 Dec;95(12):e29256. doi: 10.1002/jmv.29256.

Return to footnote 15 referrer

Footnote 16

Public Health Agency of Canada. Mpox (monkeypox): For health professionals. 2023. Accessed 2023 November 29. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/mpox/health-professionals.html

Return to footnote 16 referrer

Footnote 17

Kropp RY, Wong T, Canadian LGV Working Group. Emergence of lymphogranuloma venereum in Canada. CMAJ 2005;172(13):1674-1676.

Return to footnote 17 referrer

Footnote 18

Public Health Agency of Canada. Reported cases and rates of notifiable STI from January 1 to June 30, 2004, and January 1 to June 30, 2003. 2004.

Return to footnote 18 referrer

Footnote 19

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Lymphogranuloma venereum among men who have sex with men--Netherlands, 2003-2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;53(42):985-988.

Return to footnote 19 referrer

Footnote 20

Nieuwenhuis RF, Ossewaarde JM, Gotz HM, et al. Resurgence of lymphogranuloma venereum in Western Europe: an outbreak of Chlamydia trachomatis serovar l2 proctitis in The Netherlands among men who have sex with men. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39(7):996-1003.

Return to footnote 20 referrer

Footnote 21

Infectious syphilis in MSM, Toronto, 2002: public health interventions. Annual Meeting of the International Society for STD Research; 2003.

Return to footnote 21 referrer

Footnote 22

Infectious syphilis in MSM, Toronto, 2002: outbreak investigation. International Society for Sexually Transmitted Diseases Research Congress; 2003.

Return to footnote 22 referrer

Footnote 23

Lewis DA. Epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis and treatment of Haemophilus ducreyi-a disappearing pathogen? Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther, 2014;12(6):687-696.

Return to footnote 23 referrer

Footnote 24

O'Farrell N. Donovanosis. Sex Transm Infect. 2002;78(6):452-457.

Return to footnote 24 referrer

Footnote 25

DiCarlo RP, David H DH. The clinical diagnosis of genital ulcer disease in men. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25(2):292-298.

Return to footnote 25 referrer

Footnote 26

Workowski KA, Bachmann LH, Chan PA, Johnston CM, Muzny CA, Park I, Reno H, Zenilman JM, Bolan GA. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021 Jul 23;70(4):1-187. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7004a1.

Return to footnote 26 referrer

Footnote 27

Aurelian L. Herpes simplex viruses. Clinical Virology Manual, Fourth Edition: American Society of Microbiology; 2009. p. 424-453.

Return to footnote 27 referrer

Footnote 28

Singh AE, Romanowski B. Syphilis: review with emphasis on clinical, epidemiologic, and some biologic features. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999 Apr;12(2):187-209.

Return to footnote 28 referrer

Footnote 29

Government of South Australia - SA Health. Donovanosis (granuloma inguinale) - including symptoms, treatment and prevention. SA Health 2019.

Return to footnote 29 referrer

Footnote 30

Liu Q, Fu L, Wang B, Sun Y, Wu X, Peng X, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Human Mpox (Monkeypox) in 2022: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pathogens. 2023 Jan 15;12(1):146. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12010146.

Return to footnote 30 referrer

Footnote 31

Guarner J, Del Rio C, Malani PN. Monkeypox in 2022-What Clinicians Need to Know. JAMA. 2022 Jul 12;328(2):139-140. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.10802.

Return to footnote 31 referrer

Footnote 32

Ward T, Christie R, Paton R S, Cumming F, Overton C E. Transmission dynamics of monkeypox in the United Kingdom: contact tracing study BMJ 2022; 379 :e073153 doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-073153.

Return to footnote 32 referrer

Footnote 33

Zhang XS, Mandal S, Mohammed H, Turner C, Florence I, Walker J, et al. Transmission dynamics and effect of control measures on the 2022 outbreak of mpox among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in England: a mathematical modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Sep 11:S1473-3099(23)00451-6. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00451-6. 

Return to footnote 33 referrer

Footnote 34

Brosius I, Van Dijck C, Coppens J, Vandenhove L, Bangwen E, Vanroye F, et al. Presymptomatic viral shedding in high-risk mpox contacts: A prospective cohort study. J Med Virol. 2023 May;95(5):e28769. doi: 10.1002/jmv.28769.

Return to footnote 34 referrer

Footnote 35

Kimberlin DW. Herpes simplex virus infections of the newborn. Semin Perinatol. 2007;31(1):19-25. 

Return to footnote 35 referrer

Footnote 36

Van de Perre P, Segondy M, Foulongne V, et al. Herpes simplex virus and HIV-1: deciphering viral synergy. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8(8):490-497. 

Return to footnote 36 referrer

Footnote 37

Gupta R, Warren T, Wald A. Genital herpes. Lancet. 2007;370(9605):2127-2137. 

Return to footnote 37 referrer

Footnote 38

Freeman EE, Weiss HA, Glynn JR, Cross PL, Whitworth JA, Hayes RJ. Herpes simplex virus 2 infection increases HIV acquisition in men and women: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. AIDS 2006;20(1):73-83.

Return to footnote 38 referrer

Footnote 39

Wald A, Link K. Risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection in herpes simplex virus type 2-seropositive persons: a meta-analysis. J Infect Dis 2002; 185(1):45-52.

Return to footnote 39 referrer

Footnote 40

Smith C, Pogany L, Auguste U, Steben M, Lau T. Does suppressive antiviral therapy for herpes simplex virus prevent transmission in an HIV-positive population? A systematic review. Can Comm Dis Rep. 2016. 42-2:37-44. https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v42i02a03

Return to footnote 40 referrer

Footnote 41

Hollier LM, Eppes C. Genital herpes: oral antiviral treatments. BMJ Clin Evid 2015 Apr 8;2015:1603. 

Return to footnote 41 referrer

Footnote 42

Corey L, Wald A, Patel R, et al. Once-daily valacyclovir to reduce the risk of transmission of genital herpes. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(1):11-20. 

Return to footnote 42 referrer

Footnote 43

Piret J, Boivin G. Resistance of herpes simplex viruses to nucleoside analogues: mechanisms, prevalence, and management. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2011;55(2):459-472.

Return to footnote 43 referrer

Page details

Date modified: