Appeals

The Appeals program offers a timely and objective redress process to resolve disputes resulting from decisions the CRA made. The program also reviews requests for taxpayer relief and resolves service complaints.

Performance results 

EXPECTED RESULT INDICATOR TARGET 2014-15 RESULTS 2015-16 RESULTS 2016-17 RESULTS
CRA, service complaints, and requests for interest and/or penalty relief Percentage of service standard targets that are met or mostly met relating to timeliness for acknowledging Income Tax and Commodity Tax objections, CPP/EI appeals to the Minister,
Service Complaints, and requests to the Taxpayer Relief Program for interest and/or penalty relief
80% 100% Footnote 1 100% Footnote 1 75% Footnote 1
    First contact letter for disputes (target: within 30 calendar days, 85% of the time) 91.5% 87.2% 92.6%
    Service Complaints – two-day acknowledgement (target 80%) 98.3% 98.5% 54.1% Footnote 2
    Service Complaints – 30 day resolution (target 80%) 95.9% 91.8% 83.6%
    Taxpayer relief requests – 30 day acknowledgment (target 85%) N/A N/A 85.7%
EXPECTED RESULT INDICATOR TARGET 2014-15 RESULTS 2015-16 RESULTS 2016-17 RESULTS
Taxpayers receive an objective review of contested decisions made under the legislation administered by the CRA and a consistent review of requests for interest and/or penalty relief Percentage of decisions on disputes filed under the legislation administered by the CRA and requests for interest and/or penalty relief which meet or exceed quality assurance standards 90% N/A Footnote 3 N/A Footnote 3 N/A Footnote 4

The 2016 Fall Report of the Auditor General (AG) included the results of an audit on the CRA's Income Tax Objections program. Specifically, the AG examined how efficiently we manage income tax objections in terms of the timeliness of decisions, and found that the Agency "took too long to process income tax objections, which contributed to a backlog of the inventory of objections". The audit also examined whether performance indicators regarding the redress process were developed and reported, and reviewed whether or not the Agency studied and analyzed objections and appeals decisions, and shared such analyses internally. This audit was important because taxpayers who are not satisfied with their income tax assessments have the right to impartial and timely reviews of their tax returns. Taxpayers and the Agency may incur significant costs in time and resources as a result of undue delays.

The Auditor General's Report – available at http://www.oag-bvg.gc.ca/internet/English/parl_oag_201611_02_e_41831.htmlix – provided 8 recommendations to the CRA:

The Agency accepted the recommendations made by the OAG and developed a multi-year action plan with long-term strategies plus short-term goals and targets. During 2016-2017, we took the following steps as part of our action plan.

Our response to the Auditor General's recommendations will help the Agency further improve the manner in which objections are managed and inform redress processes that are more responsive and effective. These improvements will foster greater trust in the integrity of the Agency and promote voluntary compliance with Canada's tax laws.

Income tax/commodity tax objections and appeals to the courts

Every taxpayer who disagrees with a CRA decision about an assessment or determination made under the Income Tax Act or the Excise Tax Act has access to the CRA's dispute resolution process. The Agency receives approximately 85,000 objections each year. In 2016-2017, we received 85,418 income and commodity tax disputes. We ensure each objection is treated impartially and in accordance with applicable laws. To process objections in a timely, impartial, and consistent manner, the CRA segments them by level of complexity and whether they are individual or group objections.

As of March 31, 2017, the CRA had processed 65,701 low- and medium-complexity objections, exceeding the planned target of 59,068 for 2016-2017 by 11%. The Agency's success in resolving a greater number of objections than anticipated was the result of a number of factors, including funding from Budget 2016, workload realignment, and improved internal processes.

The CRA achieved the following outcomes during the year, broken down by type of workload and workload complexity:

Low-complexity income tax workload

Medium-complexity income tax workload

Group objections inventory

Commodity tax objections

Innovations

Innovation icon

Throughout 2016-2017, the CRA implemented a number of innovative measures to help process all objections more quickly. These included:

In addition, we conducted a review of external forms and publications related to the redress process to improve the clarity of language in the documents and promote electronic service delivery. This exercise led to:

KEY RESULTS

In 2016-2017:

Canada Pension Plan/employment insurance appeals to the Minister and appeals to the courts

Thousands of Canadians rely on payments through the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) or employment insurance (EI) as their main source of income. Prolonged disputes about eligibility for payments or the insurability of earnings can potentially cause financial hardship for them. During the year, the Agency received 2,386 CPP/EI appeals to the Minister, which were added to an opening inventory of 867. In 2016, the CRA centralized its intake of all CPP/EI appeals to the Minister at the Workload Distribution Centre in the London-Windsor Tax Services Office. This centralization has enabled the Agency to improve how it manages the CPP/EI appeals workload; as a result, processing times for handling the CPP/EI appeals to the Minister were reduced by 34.9% from 2015-2016 to 2016-2017, from an average of 191 days to 125.

KEY RESULTS

In 2016-2017:

Service complaints

The CRA offers taxpayers a process to resolve complaints about the service, quality, or timeliness of our work, as well as complaints related to the Taxpayer Bill of Rights.

The CRA recognizes that service issues raised by taxpayers provide valuable insight and feedback and can help identify areas where service can be improved for all Canadians. To this end, the CRA has begun sending out acknowledgement letters upon receipt of a service complaint. This helps to assure taxpayers that their concerns are taken seriously and that action will be taken as appropriate.

The following two cases are examples of feedback collected through service complaints in 2016-2017 and that led to service enhancements for taxpayers:

KEY RESULTS

In 2016-2017:

Taxpayer relief

The CRA administers the process under which the Minister of National Revenue may cancel or waive penalties and interest under legislative taxpayer relief provisions. In 2016-2017, the implementation of a number of enhancements to the taxpayer relief process helped improve service to taxpayers:

KEY RESULTS

In 2016-2017:

MAY 2016 CRA RESPONSE TO ALBERTA WILDFIRES

When wildfires broke out in May 2016 in Alberta, especially in the community of Fort McMurray, the CRA responded swiftly and proactively to ease the tax burden of those affected by the natural disaster.

The Agency's disaster relief response included:

  • working with Canada Post to provide secure access to mail for people who were expecting a benefit payment or tax refund, but had to evacuate their community
  • encouraging individuals, business, and first responders who found themselves unable to file or pay taxes on time to make a request for taxpayer relief
  • making designated telephone agents available to answer questions, send taxpayer relief requests, arrange direct-deposit payments, and provide advice relating to lost, destroyed, or damaged records
  • cancelling all penalties/interest for affected individuals who could not file their tax return or pay amounts owing
  • temporarily ceasing all collections, audit-related activities, and administrative correspondence in the affected area
  • helping registered charities affected by, or providing relief from, this disaster and providing information to donors who wanted to help the charities

Appeals 

BUDGETARY FINANCIAL RESOURCES (dollars)
MAIN ESTIMATES TOTAL AUTHORITIES PLANNED Footnote 7 ACTUAL Footnote 8   DIFFERENCE Footnote 9  
(PLANNED MINUS ACTUAL)
185,568,739 211,148,563 185,568,739 200,449,698 (14,880,959)
HUMAN RESOURCES (FTEs) Footnote 10
PLANNED ACTUAL DIFFERENCE Footnote 11
1,646 1,748 (102)

Page details

Date modified: