Public health management of human cases of avian influenza and associated human contacts

On this page

1.0 Introduction

The Public health management of human cases of avian influenza and associated human contacts (AI CCM) guidance provides non-subtype/-strain -specific recommendations for case and contact management of avian influenza (AI) in Canada. Public health recommendations are made to manage human cases of AI (including person under investigation (PUI), probable case, confirmed case) – regardless of the source (avian/animal/environmental/human/unknown) or locality (inside/outside Canada) of exposure – and their human contacts.Footnote a

This guidance is intended for use by public health authorities (PHAs) when a human case of avian influenza A virus infection is suspected or confirmed in Canada while human health risks are still limited. Therefore, the public health activities and measures outlined in this guidance aim to minimize opportunities for human transmission of AI and thus prevent/delay progression to human-to-human transmission (i.e., containment). Restricting opportunities for the AI virus to undergo reassortment with other avian, animal or human influenza viruses (subtypes/strains) is another objective of this guidance.

This AI CCM guidance is complementary to the Guidance on human health issues related to avian influenza in Canada (HHAI), which provides recommendations for PHAs and stakeholders (e.g., federal agencies and departments, non-governmental organizations) involved in the management of human health issues related to AI outbreaks in animals (wild, commercial or domestic) or their environments. The HHAI guidance provides prevention and treatment recommendations and serves as a reference for the mitigation and management of an outbreak related to the human health concerns of AI.

At the time of development and publication, there is very limited evidence and epidemiological data available to support the public health management of human cases of AI and associated human contacts in Canada. Therefore, the AI CCM guidance is informed by the latest epidemiology, available scientific evidence, and expert opinion regarding AI; knowledge of seasonal influenza and other respiratory infectious diseases; and general epidemiological principles. The recommendations in this guidance follow a precautionary approach given some uncertainty surrounding the associated public health risk of the rapidly evolving A(H5N1) outbreak in animals. Set in the Canadian context, this guidance is subject to change as new information becomes available and the situation in Canada unfolds. Other guidance, including recommendations for specific AI subtypes/strains (e.g., H5) and use of medical countermeasures (e.g., vaccines), may also be developed.

The AI CCM guidance should be interpreted and applied in conjunction with relevant provincial/territorial (P/T) and municipal legislation and policies. It is recognized that PHAs may adjust recommendations/activities detailed in this guidance according to a risk assessment that would include factors such as local context, epidemiology, and other jurisdiction-specific considerations. It is not intended to replace tailored public health advice provided to individuals or groups of individuals, based on clinical judgment and comprehensive individual risk assessments conducted by PHAs.

2.0 Background

AI is a contagious viral infection that mainly affects birds but can, on occasion, infect humans and other mammals.

Reports of human infections with AI are rare. Historically, human infections of AI have been associated with close contact with domestic or wild birds (e.g., handling infected poultry or other birds), exposure to highly contaminated environments (e.g., poultry farms, live animal markets), or exposure to higher risk environments (e.g., backyard/small poultry flocks). Individuals can be exposed to the virus through contact with various sources, including: infected animals (e.g., birds, wildlife, livestock, domestic mammals); animal feces, litter or secretions containing high concentrations of the virus; contaminated surfaces; and contaminated vehicles, equipment, clothing, and footwear used at involved sites (e.g., infected farms, areas with infected wildlife).

Transmission of the virus occurs via inhalation or contact with mucous membranes (e.g., eyes, nose, mouth). In addition, as per the evidence available at the time of publication, transmission of AI from human-to-human is extremely rare and has not been sustained. Despite anecdotal reports of potential foodborne AI infection following consumption of raw poultry products (e.g., raw duck organs and duck blood), to date, there have been no confirmed human cases of AI acquired through the consumption of food. All evidence to date also indicates that thorough cooking will kill the AI virus.

AI viruses are designated as highly pathogenic AI (HPAI), or low pathogenic AI (LPAI), based on the molecular characteristics of the virus and the morbidity and mortality in birds. Although disease severity and outcomes may vary based on AI subtype/strain, there is no correlation between the pathogenicity of AI viruses in birds and the infectious and pathogenic potential in humans and other mammals; both HPAI and LPAI viruses have caused mild to severe illness and death in humans and non-human mammals, and precautions are therefore warranted regardless of pathogenicity in birds. Note: Mild human illness has predominantly been associated with e.g., H3N8, H7N3, H7N7, H9N2, and severe human illness has predominantly been associated with e.g., H5N1, H5N6, H7N9, H10N8.

During the current global outbreak of avian influenza A(H5N1) (fall 2020 to present), human infections with A(H5N1) reported internationally have been associated with close contact with infected poultry, contaminated environments and potential exposure to infected cattle. To date, there have been no human cases of A(H5N1) detected in Canada. Information on the current avian influenza A(H5N1) outbreak can be found in the Latest bird flu situation - inspection.canada.ca

2.1 Signs and symptoms

Signs and symptoms of AI reported in humans have included:

Reported complications of AI have included: pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, respiratory failure, shock, multi-organ failure, meningoencephalitis, secondary bacterial or fungal infection.

3.0 Detection and surveillance

3.1 Laboratory testing

Information pertaining to specimen collection, handling, transportation, and testing is beyond the scope of this document.

Guidance relevant to the diagnosis of AI in humans can be found in the Protocol for Microbiological Investigations of Severe Acute Respiratory Infections (SARI). Technical information on certain avian influenza A virus subtypes can be found in the Influenza A virus subtypes H5, H7, and H9: Infectious substances pathogen safety data sheet.

3.2 Notification/reporting

Frontline health care providers (HCPs) and laboratories should notify local PHAs of any human case of AI (PUI, probable, or confirmed), in accordance with jurisdictional reporting requirements. Local PHAs should:

PHAC acts as the International Health Regulations (IHR) national focal point, which is the national centre designated to communicate with the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) on the Canadian situation. PHAC must notify the WHO, within 24 hours of assessment of public health information, of any event related to a human case of AI under Article 6 of the IHR (2005).

Detailed roles and responsibilities of federal/provincial/territorial (FPT) and local stakeholders can be found in Section 3.0 of the HHAI guidance.

3.3 Case definitions

National surveillance case definitions facilitate standardized case classification and reporting to PHAC from the provinces and territories. This enables accurate interpretation of epidemiologic analyses to inform public health response activities. They also ensure common and consistent communication both nationally and internationally.

In the event of an outbreak, national case definitions should be developed promptly to address the specific characteristics of the outbreak. National case definitions for avian influenza A(H5N1) virus and avian influenza A(H7N9) virus have been established and can be adapted as necessary.

The development of a national case definition relies on clinical presentation and associated laboratory techniques for illness identification. The clinical presentation may evolve as more epidemiologic information emerges, necessitating updates to enhance sensitivity, specificity, and alignment with event response objectives.

National surveillance case definitions that include categories for PUI, probable and confirmed cases are most suitable. The first two categories aid in investigating and managing potential cases, serving as placeholders should the confirmed case definition be updated to include asymptomatic or atypical infections.

Since the case definitions are intended to be used nationally, their development should be through consensus and in collaboration with FPT working groups to assist with issues surrounding national surveillance.

4.0 Public health management of cases (including person under investigation, probable case, confirmed case)

4.1 Public health authority activities

Upon notification of a human case of avian influenza A (PUI, probable, or confirmed), the PHA should initiate a case investigation which includes confirming the exposure occurrence, human infection, and exposure source. The PHA should then implement appropriate public health activities to prevent and/or limit transmission and protect human health.

Activities include:

4.2 Isolation

When care in a hospital is not required, cases should:

4.3 Public health measures for cases

While in isolation, cases should:

To further reduce the risk of spread, cases should implement the following additional public health and personal protective measures (which are also applicable to contacts):

4.4 Clinical management/treatment

Clinical management in the community, including antiviral treatment, is based on the case's condition and at the discretion of the case's HCP.

Detailed antiviral treatment recommendations can be found in Section 11.0 of the HHAI guidance.

4.5 Contact investigation/tracing

Early identification of human contacts is a key component of rapid case identification and management to limit human-to-human transmission of AI.

Contacts are individuals who have been in near proximityFootnote cFootnote 6Footnote 7Footnote 8Footnote 9Footnote 10Footnote 11 of a human case of AI during the infectious period, which may span from 1 to 2 daysFootnote 12 leading up to the case's sign/symptom onsetFootnote 13Footnote 14Footnote 15Footnote 16 to 14 days after the case's sign/symptom onset. Please refer to Table 1: Classification of contacts by exposure risk level for descriptions and examples of contacts. Once a case (PUI, probable or confirmed) is identified, PHAs should consider initiating contact tracing, based on a risk assessment, using available epidemiological and clinical information.

Contact tracing facilitates:

5.0 Public health management of contacts

5.1 Public health authority activities

The public health approach to AI contact management largely focuses on interrupting chains of transmission by identifying individuals at risk of AI infection from exposure to a human case of avian influenza A (PUI, probable, or confirmed) and/or to the same exposure source as the case.

Once human contacts are identified, PHAs should:

Note: If human-to-human transmission is suspected or known to be occurring, PHAs should consider implementing more stringent public health measures for contacts, including quarantine, in efforts to achieve the overall goal of containment. This is especially important in the window of opportunity between limited human-to-human spread and the establishment of sustained/widespread human-to human transmission unrelated to an avian/animal exposure of AI.

5.2 Exposure risk assessment of contacts (high/intermediate/low) and associated recommendations

It is recommended that all individuals who are contacts of a human case of AI (PUI, probable, or confirmed) be rapidly identified by PHAs. The risk assessment will determine the contact's risk of exposure and appropriate public health measures to follow.

Table 1 provides guidance for classifying contacts as either high, intermediate or low -risk, depending on their exposure to a human case of AI, for the purpose of determining appropriate public health measure recommendations. This information is not intended to replace more personalized public health advice provided to contacts, which is based on clinical judgment and a comprehensive risk assessment conducted by PHAs, proportionate to the risk within their jurisdiction.

The risk assessment completed by local PHAs should consider individual-level risk mitigation measures, including adherence to personal protective measures (e.g., mask use, hand hygiene, physical distancing) by both the case and the contact. In addition, local PHAs should consider individual-level health risks, including whether the contact is an individual who is at risk for more severe diseases or outcomes (e.g., individuals who are immunocompromised, individuals who are pregnant, young children), and whether the contact has received their seasonal influenza vaccination.

When determining the exposure risk level, setting-specific considerations would include those places where a contact was potentially exposed, including whether the exposure was indoors (higher risk) or outdoors (lower risk), ventilation quality, the size and number of people in the setting, etc. Although outdoor settings are generally considered lower risk, the potential for transmission still exists under certain circumstances (e.g., conversations when individuals are in near proximity and are not wearing masks), all of which should be taken into account when conducting the risk assessment. Note: there is no defined duration of exposure for contacts, with current evidence supporting the general principle that respiratory transmission is more likely to occur with a longer duration of exposure.

Table 1: Classification of contacts by exposure risk level
Exposure risk Description Possible examples Recommendations
High
  • Direct and/or intimate physical contact (e.g., hugging, kissing) with the case without PPM/PPE use
  • Being within 2 metres of the case without PPM/PPE use
  • Contact with items and surfaces contaminated with bodily fluids of the case without PPM/PPE use
  • Being in a poorly ventilated enclosed space with the case without PPM/PPE use
  • Household members who shared a living space with the case
  • Individuals, including caregivers, who had unprotected direct or indirect contact with the case and/or their contaminated environment, and/or their bodily fluids (e.g., respiratory secretions)
  • Individuals who had a face-to-face interaction with the case
  • Individuals who sat next to the case on a plane or other mode of transportation
  • Other contacts of a case based on a risk assessment completed by the local PHA
  • Active monitoring by the local PHA for 10 days after last exposure to the case
  • Follow recommended PHMs/PPMs for all contacts
  • Wear a well-fitted respirator or mask when in shared spaces with others, especially:
    • in public settings
    • around people who are at risk of severe disease or outcomes (e.g., individuals who are immunocompromised, individuals who are pregnant, young children)
  • Follow advice from local PHA and/or HCP regarding post-exposure antiviral prophylaxis
  • Maintain a record of all individuals with which the contact is in near proximity during the monitoring period
Intermediate
  • Limited or intermittent exposure to a case without proper and adequate PPM/PPE (i.e., PPE proportionate to the activity/care being performed/provided to the case)
  • Individuals, including caregivers, who had improper and/or inadequate, or breach in, PPM/PPE use when in direct or indirect contact with the case and/or their contaminated environment, and/or their bodily fluids (e.g., respiratory secretions)
  • Individuals who shared a living space where interactions with the case and their personal items were limited
  • Individuals who had brief social interactions with the case
  • Active monitoring by the local PHA for 10 days after last exposure to the case
  • Follow recommended PHMs/PPMs for all contacts
  • Wear a well-fitted respirator or mask when:
    • around others who are at risk of more severe disease or outcomes (e.g., individuals who are immunocompromised, individuals who are pregnant, young children)
    • in a crowded or poorly ventilated setting
  • Follow advice from local PHA and/or HCP regarding post-exposure antiviral prophylaxis
  • Maintain a record of all individuals with which the contact is in near proximity during the monitoring period
Low
  • Limited exposure to a case in a shared enclosed space with proper and adequate PPM/PPE use
  • Providing direct care to a case with proper and adequate PPM/PPE use
  • Individuals, including caregivers, who had proper and adequate PPM/PPE use when in direct or indirect contact with the case and/or their contaminated environment, and/or their bodily fluids (e.g., respiratory secretions)
  • Individuals who shared a well-ventilated enclosed space with a case while practising physical distancing and wearing a well-fitted respirator or medical mask
  • Passive monitoring for 10 days after last exposure to the case
    • Local PHA should inform all contacts of their exposure, and follow up at the end of the monitoring period (day 10)
  • Follow recommended PHMs/PPMs for all contacts
  • Consider wearing a well-fitted respirator or mask when:
    • around others who are at risk of more severe disease or outcomes (e.g., individuals who are immunocompromised, individuals who are pregnant, young children)
    • in a crowded or poorly ventilated setting
Acronyms: personal protective equipment (PPE), personal protective measures (PPMs) public health authority (PHA), public health measures (PHMs)

Note: Contacts can be considered cases (and should be managed as such) upon sign/symptom development.

5.3 Public health measures for all contacts

All contacts should:

To further reduce the risk of spread, contacts should implement the following additional public health and personal protective measures (which are also applicable to cases):

6.0 Other public health measures

6.1 For caregivers

Some cases or contacts (e.g., children, individuals who require support with activities of daily living, individuals who are ill with AI or another acute or a chronic illness) may need direct care from a household member, family member or friend.

If a support person is required, one individual should be appointed to fulfill caregiver duties. The caregiver should:

When providing care, the caregiver should:

Note: Caregivers of a case would be identified as a contact but with reduced transmission risk if they had proper and adequate use of personal protective measures/personal protective equipment when providing care. Therefore, whether they are managed as a contact is based on the PHA's comprehensive risk assessment and the caregiver's circumstances.

Should signs/symptoms develop, the caregiver should isolate away from others, and notify their HCP and/or local PHA for additional instructions. This includes information on:

To further reduce the risk of spread, the caregiver should implement the following additional public health and personal protective measures (which are also applicable to cases and contacts):

6.2 When seeking medical care

When accessing necessary medical care, cases and contacts should, if possible:

When using a private vehicle to seek medical care, individuals should:

In the event of a medical emergency, individuals or their caregiver should:

Case and contacts and anyone assisting with transport should strictly adhere to public health measures to help reduce the risk of transmission. EMS personnel and other HCPs assisting with transport should follow their employer's infection prevention and control recommendations. Note: Information regarding infection control practices and guidance for healthcare settings can be found in Routine Practices and Additional Precautions for Preventing the Transmission of Infection in Healthcare Settings.

7.0 Health equity and psychosocial considerations

As with other infections, AI may have a greater impact on certain population groups, in terms of illness experience (e.g., duration, severity), due to social, economic, health, and/or other risk factors (e.g., older age, chronic medical condition, poverty, living in a remote and isolated community or crowded setting).

PHAs should consider health equity and psychosocial implications when implementing public health measures to minimize human transmission of AI. Taking individual context into consideration may influence how cases and contacts accept and adhere to public health measure recommendations.

An individual's ability and willingness to practise recommended public health measures, including isolation, may be impacted by various factors, including:

Public health messaging should be clear, consistent and sensitive to the needs of populations with social, economic, cultural or other vulnerabilities.

7.1 For isolation

PHAs may need to modify isolation approaches based on each individual's unique circumstances; however, the primary goal of containment remains paramount. Local PHAs should help to determine the location where a case isolates in collaboration with the individual and their HCP, as appropriate, and facilitate/provide the necessary supports for successful isolation. The suitability of an environment for isolation will depend on the individual's living situation, and may vary depending on the sex, gender, or other socioeconomic or identity factors of the individual.

Factors to consider include:

Situations in which there are challenges accessing necessities or where individuals live alone or in a home where all household members are in isolation together may require community and social supports (e.g., family, friends, community and social services) to assist with essential needs. PHAs should facilitate contact with local leadership and organizations that can provide direct support.

In addition, isolation can have financial, social, and psychological impacts, which can be substantial. For example, for Indigenous Peoples, isolation away from home may trigger re-traumatization associated with historical colonial experiences of forced removals; there is also the potential for new trauma if the ability to be with their community, and practise cultural and/or spiritual activities, is limited.

PHAs should encourage communities to create a supportive environment to help individuals preserve their mental wellbeing, and minimize stress and hardship, during their isolation period.

8.0 Acknowledgments

This technical guidance was developed in consultation with FPT partners and stakeholders with an interest in this subject matter.

9.0 Footnotes

Page details

Date modified: