Perfluorooctane sulfonate in fish and water
Access PDF (672 kB)
Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) has been used in stain repellents, fire-fighting foams and metal plating. It is of ecological concern, given its widespread occurrence and its bioaccumulation, persistence, and toxicity in animals. These indicators assess PFOS concentrations in fish tissue and water against the Federal Environmental Quality Guidelines.Footnote 1
Fish tissue
Perfluorooctane sulfonate in fish tissue
Key results
From 2015 to 2017, fish sampling was conducted in 9 drainage regions in Canada.
- The analysis found that the concentration of PFOS was below the guidelines for fish health in all fish from all sampled drainage regions
- Four (4) out of the 9 sampled drainage regions had samples showing concentrations of PFOS that exceeded the wildlife diet guidelines
Sampled drainage region | Guidance exceedance for fish health |
Guidance exceedance for fish as diet for wildlife predators |
---|---|---|
Yukon | No | No[A] |
Peace–Athabasca | No | No |
Lower Mackenzie | No | No |
Assiniboine–Red | No | Yes |
Lower Saskatchewan–Nelson | No | Yes |
Churchill | No | No |
Great Lakes | No | Yes |
St. Lawrence | No | Yes |
Maritime Coastal | No | No[A] |
Data table for the long description
Sampling period | Sampled drainage region | Sample size (number of fish) |
Guidance exceedance for fish health (number of exceedances) |
Guidance exceedance for mammalian diet (number of exceedances) |
Guidance exceedance for avian diet (number of exceedances) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 to 2017 | Yukon | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2015 to 2017 | Peace–Athabasca | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2015 to 2017 | Lower Mackenzie | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2015 to 2017 | Assiniboine–Red | 10 | 0 | 7 | 3 |
2015 to 2017 | Lower Saskatchewan–Nelson | 10 | 0 | 6 | 1 |
2015 to 2017 | Churchill | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2015 to 2017 | Great Lakes | 60 | 0 | 56 | 52 |
2015 to 2017 | St. Lawrence | 16 | 0 | 7 | 6 |
2015 to 2017 | Maritime Coastal | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2011 to 2014 | Columbia | 20 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
2011 to 2014 | Yukon | 29 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
2011 to 2014 | Peace–Athabasca | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2011 to 2014 | Lower Mackenzie | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2011 to 2014 | Assiniboine–Red | 23 | 0 | 22 | 17 |
2011 to 2014 | Winnipeg | 50 | 0 | 43 | 13 |
2011 to 2014 | Churchill | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2011 to 2014 | Great Lakes | 231 | 0 | 208 | 180 |
2011 to 2014 | St. Lawrence | 37 | 0 | 37 | 36 |
2011 to 2014 | Saint John–St. Croix | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2011 to 2014 | Maritime Coastal | 24 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Download data file (Excel/CSV; 1.45 kB)
How this indicator was calculated
Note: [A] Represents a change between the results from the 2011 to 2014 sampling campaign and the 2015 to 2017 sampling campaign.
Source: Environment and Climate Change Canada (2018) Chemicals Management Plan Monitoring and Surveillance.
In some instances, PFOS concentrations in fish exceeded the guidelines for the protection of mammals and birds that eat fish, suggesting that PFOS could threaten predators higher in the food chain. In the Great Lakes region, the majority of the samples showed concentrations of PFOS that exceeded the wildlife diet guidelines.
Fish in Lake Ontario
Perfluorooctane sulfonate trend in fish in Lake Ontario
Key results
- PFOS concentrations in lake trout showed an overall increase between 1979 and 2000
- After 2000, the concentration stabilized for a few yearsFootnote 2 and then appear to decrease
Data table for the long description
Year | Sample size (number of fish) |
Geometric mean concentration (nanograms/gram wet weight) |
Data source |
---|---|---|---|
1979 | 4 | 16.2 | Furdui VI et al. |
1983 | 5 | 38.5 | Furdui VI et al. |
1988 | 5 | 56.0 | Furdui VI et al. |
1993 | 5 | 62.4 | Furdui VI et al. |
1998 | 5 | 27.6 | Furdui VI et al. |
2001 | 5 | 43.8 | Furdui VI et al. |
2004 | 5 | 40.5 | Furdui VI et al. |
1997 | 7 | 63.5 | Environment and Climate Change Canada, Retrospective analysis |
1998 | 8 | 69.5 | Environment and Climate Change Canada, Retrospective analysis |
1999 | 6 | 76.4 | Environment and Climate Change Canada, Retrospective analysis |
2000 | 8 | 64.2 | Environment and Climate Change Canada, Retrospective analysis |
2001 | 3 | 43.7 | Environment and Climate Change Canada, Retrospective analysis |
2002 | 9 | 109.0 | Environment and Climate Change Canada, Retrospective analysis |
2003 | 7 | 44.7 | Environment and Climate Change Canada, Retrospective analysis |
2004 | 6 | 76.0 | Environment and Climate Change Canada, Retrospective analysis |
2005 | 6 | 42.7 | Environment and Climate Change Canada, Retrospective analysis |
2006 | 12 | 69.7 | Environment and Climate Change Canada, Retrospective analysis |
2007 | 5 | 86.5 | Environment and Climate Change Canada, Retrospective analysis |
2008 | 10 | 51.3 | Environment and Climate Change Canada, Retrospective analysis |
2009 | 10 | 87.4 | Environment and Climate Change Canada, AXYS Analytical study |
2010 | 10 | 52.8 | Environment and Climate Change Canada, AXYS Analytical study |
2011 | 10 | 52.0 | Environment and Climate Change Canada, AXYS Analytical study |
2012 | 10 | 31.1 | Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Laboratory for Environmental Testing |
2013 | 10 | 34.1 | Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Laboratory for Environmental Testing |
2014 | 20 | 57.1 | Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Laboratory for Environmental Testing |
2015 | 10 | 45.4 | Environment and Climate Change Canada, National Laboratory for Environmental Testing |
Download data file (Excel/CSV; 2.26 kB)
How this indicator was calculated
Note: The concentration of perfluorooctane sulfonate in fish is expressed as an annual average (geometric mean). Two (2) datasets are represented in this chart (see the Data sources and methods section for details). The top dotted line represents the Federal Environmental Quality Guideline for fish tissue. The lower two dotted lines represent the Federal Environmental Quality Guidelines for wildlife diet (mammals and birds).
Source: Environment and Climate Change Canada (2018) Chemicals Management Plan Monitoring and Surveillance.
To provide context on changes through time, additional data showing PFOS concentrations in Lake Ontario fish are presented for the period 1979 to 2015. Levels of PFOS in lake trout were well below the guideline for fish tissue in all collection years. This suggests a low probability of adverse effects to fish related to PFOS exposure. These results suggest that, although PFOS concentrations in lake trout from Lake Ontario have stopped increasing in response to the voluntary and regulatory actions (2006 and 2012), corresponding concentration in trout from the most recent years may be declining, although more data is required to confirm a decline is underway.
In contrast, PFOS levels were all above the guidelines for wildlife diet and could represent a risk to wildlife that feed on fish.
Water
Perfluorooctane sulfonate in water
Key results
From 2016 to 2017, 163 water samplings were conducted in 8 drainage regions in Canada.
- The analysis found that all water samples had PFOS concentrations at least 200-fold lower than the guideline for water
- Perfluorooctane sulfonate was detected in 49% of samples and concentrations ranged from less than 2 nanograms per liter (ng/L) up to 26.1 ng/L
Sampled drainage region | Guidance exceedance for concentration in water |
---|---|
Pacific Coastal | No |
Okanagan–Similkameen | No |
Assiniboine–Red | No |
Great Lakes | No |
St. Lawrence | No |
St. John–St. Croix | No |
Maritime Coastal | No |
Newfoundland–Labrador | No |
Data table for the long description
Sampled drainage region | Total sample size (number of water samples) |
Detectable sample (number of water samples) |
Detection percentage | Guidance exceedance for concentration in water |
Minimum concentration (nanograms per litre) |
Maximum concentration (nanograms per litre) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pacific Coastal | 10 | 9 | 90 | No | 2.1 | 11.9 |
Okanagan–Similkameen | 10 | 6 | 60 | No | 2.8 | 9.3 |
Assiniboine–Red | 52 | 22 | 42 | No | 1.9 | 22.8 |
Great Lakes | 37 | 31 | 84 | No | 2.2 | 26.1 |
St. Lawrence | 26 | 3 | 12 | No | 2.5 | 3.8 |
St. John–St. Croix | 4 | 1 | 25 | No | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Maritime Coastal | 17 | 4 | 24 | No | 2.2 | 3.4 |
Newfoundland–Labrador | 7 | 3 | 43 | No | 2.0 | 3.8 |
Total | 163 | 79 | 48 | No | 1.9 | 26.1 |
Download data file (Excel/CSV; 1.06 kB)
How this indicator was calculated
Source: Environment and Climate Change Canada (2018) Chemicals Management Plan Monitoring and Surveillance.
About the indicators
About the indicators
What the indicators measure
These indicators identify the drainage regions where concentrations are below or above the Federal Environmental Quality Guidelines (the guidelines) for perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in fish and water. The guidelines were developed under the Chemicals Management Plan and are used in this report to evaluate whether, and the degree to which, concentrations in the environment exceed the guidelines.
Why these indicators are important
These indicators provide information on the presence of PFOS in the environment and indications of the progress of strategies and policies to reduce or control their occurrence in the environment.
Perfluorooctane sulfonate is a synthetic substance belonging to a larger class of organic fluorochemicals that are partially or completely saturated with fluorine. Because of its chemical properties and use patterns, PFOS is typically found at higher concentrations in water than in air and can spread far from its point of release through oceanic currents. In addition, PFOS precursor compounds can travel through air and often end up in the Arctic, where they degrade to PFOS. Perfluorooctane sulfonate is a highly persistent substance. It bioaccumulates, potentially harming many species including top predatory fish, birds and mammals.
Perfluorooctane sulfonate is considered a high-priority chemical under the Chemicals Management Plan. The Government of Canada declared PFOS to be toxic as defined under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. Perfluorooctane sulfonate was never manufactured in Canada and was voluntarily phased out of production by its primary supplier in the United States in 2002. In 2006, the Government of Canada developed a Risk management strategy for perfluorooctane sulfonate and its salts and precursors with the objective of minimizing its release into the Canadian environment. PFOS is listed on the Prohibition of Certain Toxic Substances Regulations, 2012, which prohibits the manufacture, use, sale and import of PFOS and products containing PFOS with a limited number of exemptions.
Because PFOS and its precursors can be transported over long distances through water and air, PFOS found in the Canadian environment may originate from both domestic and foreign sources. Consequently, Canada is engaged in two international agreements that severely restrict production and the use of PFOS. These agreements are the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants and the Protocol on Persistent Organic Pollutants of the United Nations Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution. The objective of these international agreements is to protect human health and the environment from persistent organic pollutants.
Despite restrictions, PFOS remains in the Canadian environment because of a combination of long-range transport of both PFOS and compounds that break down to PFOS, its widespread use in the past, and its persistence in the environment.
The Perfluorooctane sulfonate in fish and water indicators contribute to the measurement of progress towards the 2016–2019 Federal Sustainable Development Strategy.
Related indicators
The Polybrominated diphenyl ethers in fish and sediment indicators identify the drainage regions where concentrations of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in fish and sediment are above the Federal Environmental Quality Guidelines.
Safe and healthy communities
These indicators support the measurement of progress towards the following 2016–2019 Federal Sustainable Development Strategy long-term goal: All Canadians live in clean, sustainable communities that contribute to their health and well-being.
Data sources and methods
Data sources and methods
Data sources
Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) environmental concentration data were obtained from Environment and Climate Change Canada's Chemicals Management Plan Monitoring and Surveillance Program.
More information
The sampling locations for fish and water varied throughout the reporting years. Data for fish and water were gathered in as many drainage regions as permitted by program capacity in any year. To provide a better representation of each drainage region, all the samples for all the recent available years, namely 2015 to 2017 for fish and 2016 to 2017 for water, were used to calculate the indicators.
There is a time lag of 2 to 3 years between the sampling date and publication of the indicators. This time lag is due to the time required to perform the monitoring, to compile the data, to validate (that is, perform quality assurance and control), analyze, review and report on the indicators, and to ensure enough recent data is available for comparison with past data or previous editions of the indicators.
Perfluorooctane sulfonate in fish from Lake Ontario
For the analysis of PFOS in fish from Lake Ontario, data were obtained from 4 distinct datasets. The first comes from a study led by Furdui from the Ontario's Ministry of the Environment in collaboration with Fisheries and Oceans Canada and Environment and Climate Change Canada. It covers 7 sample years spread over a period from 1979 to 2004. The other 3 datasets come from Environment and Climate Change Canada's Freshwater Quality Monitoring and Surveillance program:
- a retrospective analysis conducted using specimens from the National Aquatic Biological Specimen Bank covering each year from 1997 to 2008
- an analysis undertaken by AXYS Analytical for Environment and Climate Change Canada covering 2009 to 2011
- an analysis conducted by Environment and Climate Change Canada's National Laboratory for Environmental Testing covering 2012 to 2015
Federal Environmental Quality Guidelines
The Federal Environmental Quality Guidelines (the guidelines) provide benchmarks for the quality of the ambient environment. Where the guideline is met there is low likelihood of adverse effects on species that are exposed. The guidelines can serve 3 functions:
- they can aid in preventing pollution by providing targets for acceptable environmental quality
- they can assist in evaluating the significance of concentrations of chemical substances currently found in the environment (monitoring of water, sediment, and biological tissue)
- they can serve as performance measures of the success of risk management activities
The guidelines were developed under the Chemical Management Plan. Measured concentrations exceeding the guideline levels indicate the potential for aquatic organisms or their wildlife's predators to be affected by PFOS.
Four (4) different guidelines were used in the development of the indicators. Two (2) Guidelines for PFOS in fish tissue and in water are for the protection of aquatic life. Two (2) additional guidelines for PFOS are used to compare measured concentrations in fish tissue and are designed for the protection of wildlife (for example, mammals and birds) that prey on aquatic life.
Guideline | Guideline value for perfluorooctane sulfonate |
---|---|
Fish tissue | 9 400 nanograms per gram (ng/g) wet weight |
Water | 6 800 nanograms per litre (ng/L) |
Wildlife diet for mammals | 4.6 ng/g wet weight |
Wildlife diet for birds | 8.2 ng/g wet weight |
Source: Environment and Climate Change Canada (2018) Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 Federal Environmental Quality Guidelines Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS).
Spatial coverage
The indicators use water drainage regions as the geographical unit for the calculation of the national indicators. These drainage regions correspond to those defined in Statistics Canada's Standard Drainage Area Classification.
Geographic extent of the drainage regions used for the indicators
Source: Statistics Canada (2009) Standard Drainage Area Classification (SDAC) 2003.
Methods
The Perfluorooctane sulfonate in fish and water indicators determine whether the Federal Environmental Quality Guidelines (the guidelines) for PFOS in fish and water have been exceeded in each drainage region.
More information
Perfluorooctane sulfonate in fish tissue and in water
Monitoring for PFOS in fish was conducted in 9 drainage regions between 2015 and 2017 and in 8 drainage regions between 2016 and 2017 for PFOS in water. Samples with PFOS concentrations above the guidelines are defined as an exceedance.
Drainage region | Waterbody | Species name |
---|---|---|
Yukon | Kusawa Lake | Lake Trout |
Peace–Athabasca | Lake Athabasca | Lake Trout |
Lower Mackenzie | Great Bear Lake | Lake Trout |
Assiniboine–Red | Lake Diefenbaker | Walleye |
Lower Saskatchewan–Nelson | Lake Winnipeg | Walleye |
Churchill | Cold Lake | Lake Trout |
Churchill | Reindeer Lake | Lake Trout |
Great Lakes | Lake Huron | Lake Trout |
Great Lakes | Lake Ontario | Lake Trout |
Great Lakes | Lake Superior | Lake Trout |
St. Lawrence | Lac Memphrémagog | Lake Trout |
St. Lawrence | St. Lawrence River | Walleye |
Maritime Coastal | Kejimkujik Lake | Brook Trout |
Source: Environment and Climate Change Canada (2018) Chemicals Management Plan Environmental Monitoring and Surveillance.
Perfluorooctane sulfonate trend in fish from Lake Ontario
A retrospective analysis of PFOS concentrations in lake trout from Lake Ontario was completed by Environment and Climate Change Canada using samples preserved in the National Aquatic Biological Specimen Bank in order to extend the monitoring timeline back to 1979. These measurements were combined with PFOS concentrations from studies done by Furdui VI et al. (2007 and 2008) covering the years 1979 to 2004.Footnote 3 Furdui VI et al. also obtained Lake Ontario Lake trout from the National Aquatic Biological Specimen Bank and analyzed the samples at Ontario's Ministry of the Environment. These concentrations were added to more recent samplings done by Environment and Climate Change Canada.
Caveats and limitations
Monitoring and surveillance of PFOS in lakes and rivers under the Chemicals Management Plan began in 2007 (except for Lake Ontario, which was initiated in the 1990s).
Monitoring is not necessarily performed at the same location each year because of challenges in obtaining fish or water samples. These challenges include remoteness, shipping logistics and resource constraints. Given this, a year-to-year comparison at the national level is not yet possible. To address this limitation, the Perfluorooctane sulfonate in fish and water indicators are estimated by grouping the samples in the drainage area for multiple years: 2015 to 2017 for fish and 2016 to 2017 for water.
Resources
Resources
References
Environment and Climate Change Canada (2006) Risk management strategy for perfluorooctane sulfonate and its salts and precursors. Retrieved on October 10, 2018.
Environment and Climate Change Canada (2011) Environmental Monitoring and Surveillance in Support of the Chemicals Management Plan. Retrieved on October 10, 2018.
Environment and Climate Change Canada (2012) Canada's National Aquatic Biological Specimen Bank and Database. Retrieved on October 10, 2018.
Environment and Climate Change Canada (2013) Perfluorooctane Sulfonate in the Canadian Environment. Retrieved on October 10, 2018.
Environment and Climate Change Canada (2018) Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 Federal Environmental Quality Guidelines Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS). Retrieved on October 10, 2018.
Furdui VI, Stock NL, Ellis DA, Butt CM, Whittle DM, Crozier PW, Reiner EJ, Muir DC and Mabury SA (2007) Spatial distribution of perfluoroalkyl contaminants in lake trout from the Great Lakes. Environmental Science & Technology 41: 1554-1559.
Furdui VI, Helm PA, Crozier PW, Lucanciu C, Reiner EJ, Marvin CH, Whittle DM, Mabury SA and Tomy GT (2008) Temporal trends of perfluoroalkyl compounds with isomer analysis in lake trout from Lake Ontario (1979-2004). Environmental Science & Technology 42(13): 4739-4744. Retrieved on October 10, 2018.
Gewurtz SB, De Silva AO, Backus SM, McGoldrick DJ, Keir MJ, Small J, Melymuk L and Muir DCG (2012) Perfluoroalkyl contaminants in Lake Ontario Lake Trout: Detailed examination of current status and long-term trends. Environmental Science & Technology 46: 5842-5850.
McGoldrick DJ, Clark MG, Keir MJ, Backus SM and Malecki MM (2010) Canada's national aquatic biological specimen bank and database. Journal of Great Lakes Research 36(2): 393-398. Retrieved on October 10, 2018.
Page details
- Date modified: