Collective bargaining in federally regulated workplaces: Results from the 2022 Survey of Employees under Federal Jurisdiction
On this page
- Introduction
- Rail transportation has the highest share of unionized employees
- Close to one third of non-unionized employees in air transportation and in courier services and pipelines would be “very likely” or “likely” to vote in favour of forming a union
- Employees in rail transportation very likely to work for an employer that has a committee in which union representatives and management meet to solve problems
- Employers in the federal jurisdiction are unlikely to try to stop their employees from participating in union activities or pressure them to spend less time on union activities
- Data source, methods and notes to the reader
List of tables
List of figures
Introduction
This report examines the results of the 2022 Survey of Employees under Federal Jurisdiction (SEFJ) regarding collective bargaining coverage. The survey targeted employees working for employers covered by Part III of the Canada Labour Code except certain miscellaneous activities and First Nation band councils and related activities (for more information, see "Data source, methods and notes to the reader"). In the rest of the document, the target universe of the survey is referred to as the "federal jurisdiction". Tables of statistics from the survey are also available on the Open Government Portal.
Rail transportation has the highest share of unionized employees
Overall, 34% of employees in the federal jurisdiction were covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Rail transportation and postal services and pipelines were the sectors with the highest share of unionized employees, with between 70% and 75% employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Meanwhile, around 60% of employees in maritime transportation were unionized. In air transportation, it was 55%. Banks (0.3%) had the lowest share of unionized employees (Table 1).Footnote 1
Sector | Share of unionized employees |
---|---|
All sectors | 31% |
Air transportation | 55% |
Rail transportation | 75% |
Road transportation | 18% |
Maritime transportation | 60% |
Postal services and pipelines | 70% |
Banks | 0.3% |
Feed, flour, seed and grain | 15% |
Telecommunications and broadcasting | 43% |
Other | 30% |
- Note: Estimates in this table are partly based on the SEFJ. See footnote 1 for details.
Close to one third of non-unionized employees in air transportation and in courier services and pipelines would be “very likely” or “likely” to vote in favour of forming a union
The SEFJ asked employees who were not covered by a union contract or collective bargaining agreement how likely they would be to vote in favour of forming of a union in their workplace.Footnote 2 Across the federal jurisdiction, 20.9% of employees declared that they were “very likely” or “likely” to vote in favour of forming a union, 12.4% asserted that they were “neither likely nor unlikely”, and 46.5% said that they were “unlikely” or “very unlikely”. The 4 sectors with the highest share of employees responding “unlikely” or “very unlikely” were feed, flour, seed and grain (57.8%), banks (48.5%), road transportation (48.3%), and maritime transportation (47.3%). By contrast, air transportation (31.0%) and courier services and pipelines (31.2%) had the highest share of employees responding, “very likely” or “likely” (Table 2).
Sector | Very likely | Likely | Neither likely nor unlikely | Unlikely | Very unlikely | Don't know |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All sectors | 11.5% | 9.4% | 12.4% | 14.3% | 32.2% | 20.1% |
Air transportation | 18.8% | 12.2% | 13.9% | 12.5% | 28.7% | 13.9% |
Rail transportation | 16.9% | 5.4% | 15.5% | 13.9% | 31.6% | 16.8% |
Road transportation | 11.1% | 9.3% | 10.2% | 15.0% | 33.3% | 21.1% |
Maritime transportation | 11.3% | 10.9% | 14.1% | 16.2% | 31.1% | 16.4% |
Courier and pipelines | 16.4% | 14.8% | 11.4% | 12.1% | 27.2% | 18.1% |
Banks | 8.3% | 7.6% | 12.5% | 14.8% | 33.7% | 23.1% |
Feed, flour, seed and grain | 8.8% | 5.7% | 13.0% | 16.1% | 41.7% | 14.7% |
Telecommunications and broadcasting | 13.1% | 10.3% | 15.3% | 13.6% | 29.7% | 17.9% |
- Note: Responses are limited to employees who declared that they were not covered by a union contract or collective agreement.
Employees in rail transportation very likely to work for an employer that has a committee in which union representatives and management meet to solve problems
Employees that were unionized and those that didn’t know whether they were unionized were asked about whether their employer had a committee in which union representatives and management met to solve problems.Footnote 3 Among these employees, 61.3% indicated that their employer had such a committee, 5.8% said that their employer did not have one, and 32.9% answered “don’t know”. Employees in rail transportation (74.6%), feed, flour, seed and grain (73.9%), air transportation (72.8%), and maritime transportation (70.0%) were the most likely to declare that their employer had such a committee (Figure 1).

- Note: Responses are limited to employees that responded “yes” or “don’t know” to being covered by a union contract or collective agreement or to being a member of a union.
Figure 1: text version
Sector | Yes | No | Don't know |
---|---|---|---|
All sectors | 61.3% | 5.8% | 32.9% |
Air transportation | 72.8% | 4.1% | 23.0% |
Rail transportation | 74.6% | 10.2% | 15.3% |
Road transportation | 50.2% | 8.6% | 41.2% |
Maritime transportation | 70.0% | 9.0% | 21.0% |
Courier services and pipelines | 60.2% | 6.8% | 33.0% |
Feed, flour, seed and grain | 73.9% | 9.8% | 16.1% |
Telecommunications and broadcasting | 63.2% | 2.9% | 33.9% |
Employers in the federal jurisdiction are unlikely to try to stop their employees from participating in union activities or pressure them to spend less time on union activities
Across the federal jurisdiction, 1.9% of employees declared that their employer had tried to stop them from participating in union activities or pressured them to spend less time on union activities.Footnote 4 Meanwhile, 85.6% of employees declared that their employer had not engaged in such activity, and 12.5% of employees responded, “don’t know”. Employees in rail transportation (6.6%) and air transportation (4.8%) were the most likely to assert that their employer had engaged in such activity (Figure 2).

Figure 2: text version
Sector | Yes | No | Don't know |
---|---|---|---|
All sectors | 1.9% | 85.6% | 12.5% |
Air transportation | 4.8% | 82.1% | 13.1% |
Rail transportation | 6.6% | 86.9% | 6.4% |
Road transportation | 1.5% | 88.9% | 9.6% |
Maritime transportation | 2.9% | 89.7% | 7.5% |
Courier services and pipelines | 2.3% | 83.2% | 14.5% |
Banks | 0.2% | 83.6% | 16.2% |
Feed, flour, seed and grain | 1.8% | 89.0% | 9.3% |
Telecommunications and broadcasting | 1.6% | 88.8% | 9.6% |
Data source, methods, and notes to the reader
Data source and methods
The data source used for this report is the 2022 Survey of Employees under Federal Jurisdiction (SEFJ). The survey was conducted by Statistics Canada on behalf for the Labour Program of Employment and Social Development Canada. The aim of the survey was to collect data on the working conditions of employees working in federally regulated workplaces. Topics covered include: work hours, health and safety, work-life balance, exposure to workplace harassment and discrimination, as well as access to leaves, benefits, flexible work arrangements, and collective bargaining coverage. Statistics Canada distributed the survey to 37,500 employees in early 2022 (January to March). About 19,060 employees responded to the survey.
The survey targeted employees working for employers covered by Part III of the Canada Labour Code. Part III of the Canada Labour Code covers approximately 6% of employees in Canada. This includes employees working in the following 8 sectors: air transportation; rail transportation; road transportation; maritime transportation; courier services and pipelines; banks; feed, flour, seed and grain; and telecommunications and broadcasting. Henceforth, the terminology "federal jurisdiction" (FJ) is used to refer to these sectors. The survey did not collect data from employees working in various miscellaneous activities outside of these 8 sectors, such as certain federal Crown and shared governance corporations, federally regulated mines and companies engaged in the management of fisheries. First Nation band councils and related activities were also not included.
Notes to the reader
- The sample frame for the SEFJ was constructed using lists of employees known to work at establishments under federal jurisdiction. These lists were either provided by employers or derived from administrative data sources such as tax data. For some employers, employee lists were either not provided or they were not usable, which was a source of under coverage for the frame. This under coverage was most significant among large establishments in the postal wing of the courier services and pipeline sector and establishments in the rail transportation sector. It is a potential source of bias when calculating estimates within those domains. In addition, due to the under coverage of postal services and, consequently, the much larger contribution of courier services, the sector was renamed to "courier services and pipelines" from its original "postal services and pipelines".
- The pipeline industry is combined with the courier industry because it has a relatively small number of employees. Given limitations on sample size, statistics reported for this sector alone would likely conflict with Statistics Canada's confidentiality and data quality requirements for reporting statistics.
- The estimates presented in this report are based on valid responses only, invalid responses have been excluded.
- Where relevant, estimates may not sum to exactly 100% due to rounding.
- The SEFJ included questions on both sex at birth and gender. This report uses the variable "gender", which is consistent with the approach used in the most recent Census of Population. Given that the gender-diverse category did not have a sufficient size to be reported, gender-diverse responses were randomly aggregated among the binary gender categories by Statistics Canada. Respondents who declined to provide a response to the question "What is your gender" are treated as non-responses and are therefore excluded from the results reported by gender.
Page details
- Date modified: