Organizational Expenditure Overview - 2014-15 Departmental Performance Report - Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Section I: Organizational Expenditure Overview
Organizational Profile
Appropriate Minister: The Honourable Scott Brison, President of the Treasury Board
Institutional Head: Yaprak Baltacioglu, Secretary of the Treasury Board
Ministerial Portfolio: The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat and the Canada School of Public Service. Operating at arm's length and reporting to Parliament through the President of the Treasury Board are the Public Sector Pension Investment Board, the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada and the Office of the Public Sector Integrity Commissioner of Canada.
Enabling Instruments: Financial Administration Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. F-11
Year of Commencement: 1966
Organizational Context
Raison d'être
The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (Secretariat) is the administrative arm of the Treasury Board, and the President of the Treasury Board is the Minister responsible for the Secretariat. This organization supports the Treasury Board by making recommendations and providing advice on program spending, regulations and management policies and directives, while respecting the primary responsibility of deputy heads in managing their organizations, and their roles as accounting officers before Parliament. In this way, the Secretariat strengthens the way government is managed and helps to ensure value for money in government spending and results for Canadians.
Responsibilities
The Secretariat supports the Treasury Board in each of its roles (see text box “Treasury Board Roles”). Within the Secretariat, the Comptroller General of Canada provides government-wide leadership, direction, oversight and capacity building for financial management, internal audit and the management of assets and acquired services. The Chief Human Resources Officer provides government-wide leadership on people management through policies, programs and strategic engagements and by centrally managing labour relations, compensation, pensions and benefits and contributing to the management of executives. The Chief Information Officer provides government-wide leadership, direction, oversight and capacity building for information management, information technology, government security (including identity management) and access to information, privacy, and internal and external service delivery.
The Treasury Board Portfolio consists of the Secretariat and the Canada School of Public Service. The Public Sector Pension Investment Board, the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada and the Office of the Public Sector Integrity Commissioner of Canada are arm’s-length organizations that report to Parliament through the President of the Treasury Board.
When working with federal departments, agencies and Crown corporations, the Secretariat plays three central agency roles:
- A leadership role in driving and modelling excellence in public sector management and in identifying and launching government-wide horizontal initiatives that target administrative efficiencies;
- A challenge and oversight role that includes reporting on the government’s management and budgetary performance and developing government-wide management policies and standards; and
- A community enabling role to help organizations improve management performance.
Strategic Outcome and Program Alignment ArchitectureFootnote 1
In 2014–, the Secretariat’s Program Alignment Architecture included six programs that contributed to the achievement of its Strategic Outcome, “Government is well managed and accountable, and resources are allocated to achieve results.” Detailed information about the Secretariat’s Strategic Outcome and about each program can be found in Section II: Analysis of Programs by Strategic Outcome.
2014– Program Alignment Architecture
Strategic Outcome: Government is well managed and accountable, and resources are allocated to achieve results.
- 1.1 Program: Management Frameworks
- 1.1.1 Sub-Program: Strategic Management and Governance
- 1.1.2 Sub-Program: Sound Management and Decision Making
- 1.1.3 Sub-Program: Service Modernization
- 1.1.4 Sub-Program: Information Management, Access and Privacy
- 1.1.5 Sub-Program: Management of Information Technology
- 1.1.6 Sub-Program: Government Security
- 1.1.7 Sub-Program: Communications and Corporate Identity
- 1.1.8 Sub-Program: Regulatory Management
- 1.2 Program: People Management
- 1.2.1 Sub-Program: Direction Setting
- 1.2.2 Sub-Program: Enabling Infrastructure
- 1.2.3 Sub-Program: Comprehensive Management of Compensation
- 1.3 Program: Expenditure Management
- 1.3.1 Sub-Program: Results-Based Expenditure Management
- 1.3.2 Sub-Program: Expenditure Management Advice and Reporting
- 1.3.3 Sub-Program: Compensation Expenditure Management
- 1.4 Program: Financial Management
- 1.4.1 Sub-Program: Financial Management, Oversight and Reporting
- 1.4.2 Sub-Program: Internal Audit
- 1.4.3 Sub-Program: Assets and Acquired Services
- 1.5 Program: Government-Wide Funds and Public Service Employer Payments
- Internal Services
Organizational Priorities
In its 2014– Report on Plans and Priorities, the Secretariat established five organizational priorities that contribute to its Strategic Outcome:
- Priority 1: Strengthen government financial and expenditure management to support value for money, ongoing cost-containment and increased operational efficiency;
- Priority 2: Modernize people management to support a productive, high-performing, and affordable public service;
- Priority 3: Provide leadership in information management (IM) and strategic use of information technology (IT) to enable more efficient and effective enterprise delivery of government programs and services;
- Priority 4: Further reduce red tape for business, and streamline internal government rules to increase efficiency and reduce costs; and
- Priority 5: Continue to implement the Secretariat’s workplace renewal initiative to modernize its office space, technology and internal operations and improve efficiency.
The results achieved under each priority are summarized below. Further information on results can be found in the “Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned” section of each of the Secretariat’s programs in Section II: Analysis of Programs by Strategic Outcome.
Typetable 1 note 1 | Programs |
---|---|
|
|
Ongoing |
|
Summary of Progress |
|
In 2014–, the Secretariat:
|
Type | Programs |
---|---|
Ongoing |
People Management |
Summary of Progress |
|
In 2014–, the Secretariat:
|
Type | Programs |
---|---|
Ongoing |
|
Summary of Progress |
|
In 2014–, the Secretariat:
|
Type | Programs |
---|---|
Ongoing |
|
Summary of Progress |
|
In 2014–, the Secretariat:
|
Type | Programs |
---|---|
Ongoing |
All programs, including Internal Services |
Summary of Progress |
|
In 2014–, the Secretariat:
|
Risk Analysis
The Secretariat actively monitors its operating environment to identify and manage risks that could affect progress toward its Strategic Outcome and organizational priorities. Key risks are captured in the Secretariat's Corporate Risk Profile, which is updated annually. These risks are outlined in the table and narrative below.
Risk | Risk Response Strategy | Link to Program Alignment Architecture |
---|---|---|
1. Cyber-Security There is a risk that a cyber-attack could breach current Government of Canada (GC) information systems and infrastructure, resulting in the compromise of sensitive data and information. |
In 2014–, the Secretariat:
All responses for this year were completed as planned. |
Government Security (1.1.6) |
2. Back Office Transformation There is a risk that the complexity and pace of the transformation agenda may exceed departments' and the Secretariat's capacity to drive the standardization and consolidation of the back office. |
In 2014–, the Secretariat:
All responses for this year were completed as planned. |
|
3. Expenditure Management There is a risk that gaps in the Secretariat's information and analytic capacity may limit its ability to perform a robust challenge function and to provide sound advice to ministers on costs and expenditure management. |
In 2014–, the Secretariat:
All responses for this year were completed as planned. |
|
4. High-Performing Public Service There is a risk that there is a misalignment between the skills and abilities required for an evolving and high-performing public service and the current people management policies and tools. |
In 2014–, the Secretariat:
All responses for this year were completed as planned. |
|
In 2014–, the Secretariat continued to work in a dynamic environment to promote good governance and sound stewardship and enable efficient and effective service to Canadians. The Secretariat's top four risks were primarily driven by external factors—rapid technological change and the increased use of mobile devices, diminished fiscal flexibility, and the increased complexity of whole-of-government systems.
The Secretariat managed its top four risks by seeking to set clearer expectations for other government departments, by increasing engagement with departments, by strengthening the capacity of functional communities, and by improving governance over enterprise-wide initiatives.
The following risk analysis elaborates on the above-mentioned external factors and on the relevance of the identified risks.
1. Cyber-Security
While technological change provides opportunities for greater efficiency, it also presents potential risks from a security perspective. Rapidly evolving cyber-threats are an ongoing concern. In the face of such incidents, Canadian citizens and federal government partners (including industry and other jurisdictions) will demand that the Government of Canada protect their information so that program and service delivery is secure and resilient.
As the government-wide lead on IT security policy and standards, the Secretariat has a responsibility to work with other federal organizations to support a coordinated and strategic approach to cyber-security. Despite the maturity of its current risk response, this area of risk is ongoing. The Secretariat remains focused on progressively evolving its risk response in order to keep up with the pace of technology and counter significant threats.
2. Back Office Transformation
The government continues to use technology to increase efficiency and reduce the administrative costs associated with its back office functions (e.g., human resources, finance, and information management). This involves standardizing, consolidating and simplifying the administrative processes and systems that support the operations of federal organizations.
As a central agency, the Secretariat is well positioned to facilitate a strategic and coordinated approach across government to achieve intended reforms. Developing a government-wide strategy and staging the roll-out of individual back office initiatives is helping to reduce the risks associated with implementing back office transformation. However, this area of work is complex, and some uncertainty remains—particularly when adopting novel approaches and working in areas of shared accountability. The Secretariat is managing the risks by focusing on enterprise governance, change management, strategic communications, outcomes management and performance management.
3. Expenditure Management
The Secretariat continued to focus on providing comprehensive, accurate and reliable financial and non-financial information to Cabinet and Parliament to ensure sound financial decisions. Ongoing measures in this area include efforts to improve information management, business processes, data and analysis, financial community development, and due diligence.
4. High-Performing Public Service
After several years of reduced recruitment and workforce adjustments, the public service is again turning to attracting, developing and retaining talent in order to prepare for long-term demographic shifts.
The Secretariat is simultaneously coordinating multiple complex human resources initiatives to modernize people management and support a productive, high-performing and affordable public service. Specific steps are being taken to improve departmental and public service–wide analysis of workforce needs.
Actual Expenditures
Main Estimates | Planned Spending | Total Authorities Available for Use |
Actual Spending (authorities used) |
Difference (actual minus planned) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Note: |
||||
7,364,924,114 | 7,364,924,114 | 5,255,176,055 | 3,221,689,682 | -4,143,234,432 |
Planned | Actual | Difference (actual minus planned) |
---|---|---|
1,891 | 1,835 | -56 |
Strategic Outcome, Programs and Internal Services | 2014–15 Main Estimates |
2014–15 Planned Spending |
2015–16 Planned Spending |
2016–17 Planned Spending |
2014–15 Total Authorities Available for Use | 2014–15 Actual Spending (authorities used) |
2013–14 Actual Spending (authorities used) |
2012–13 Actual Spending (authorities used) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Note: Any minor numerical differences are due to rounding. |
||||||||
Strategic Outcome: Government is well managed and accountable, and resources are allocated to achieve results | ||||||||
Management Frameworks | 51,725,463 | 51,725,463 | 57,678,755 | 54,481,225 | 57,875,343 | 58,544,372 | ||
People Management | 64,550,201 | 64,550,201 | 139,264,938 | 128,785,777 | 57,834,089 | 60,974,838 | ||
Expenditure Management | 31,791,958 | 31,791,958 | 31,548,046 | 30,431,157 | 35,573,464 | 31,046,559 | ||
Financial Management | 32,235,681 | 32,235,681 | 31,429,596 | 31,231,325 | 31,291,934 | 30,866,718 | ||
Government-Wide Funds and Public Service Employer Payments | 7,106,195,208 | 7,106,195,208 | 4,905,924,725 | 2,898,360,909 | 2,629,221,633 | 2,500,372,808 | ||
Strategic Outcome: Good governance and sound stewardship to enable efficient and effective service to Canadians | ||||||||
Decision-Making Support and Oversight | 47,506,141 | 47,927,651 | ||||||
Management Policies Development and Monitoring | 73,826,361 | 71,875,824 | ||||||
Government-Wide Program Design and Delivery | 50,671,220 | 48,051,421 | ||||||
Government-Wide Funds and Public Service Employer Payments | 6,645,161,074 | 6,333,254,397 | ||||||
Subtotal | 7,286,498,511 | 7,286,498,511 | 6,817,164,796 | 6,501,109,293 | 5,165,846,060 | 3,143,290,393 | 2,811,796,463 | 2,681,805,295 |
Internal Services Subtotal | 78,425,603 | 78,425,603 | 75,279,537 | 64,308,499 | 89,329,995 | 78,399,289 | 80,724,486 | 80,220,719 |
Total | 7,364,924,114 | 7,364,924,114 | 6,892,444,333 | 6,565,417,791 | 5,255,176,055 | 3,221,689,682 | 2,892,520,949 | 2,762,026,013 |
In 2015–, the Secretariat revised its Program Alignment Architecture to better reflect core business activities and support the achievement of expected results. Due to significant differences between the Secretariat's previous Program Alignment Architecture and the current structure, no historical spending has been restated leading to 2014–.
The above tables provide the Main Estimates, the planned spending, the total authorities available for use, and the actual spending (authorities used) related to each program for 2014–, which are explained by program in the Analysis of Programs by Strategic Outcome section. For comparison purposes, planned spending is provided for 2015– and 2016–, and actual spending is provided for 2012– and 2013–.
The Government-Wide Funds and Public Service Employer Payments program is the largest portion of the Secretariat's planned spending. Based on a three-year average, government-wide funds account for approximately 59 per cent of planned spending for this program. These funds are available for transfer to, and spending by, other departments and agencies. This includes the transfer of funding for centrally managed Votes such as government contingencies, government-wide initiatives, operating and capital budget carry forward, paylist expendituresFootnote 2 and compensation requirements (Central Votes 5, 10, 15, 25, 30 and 33) to other departments and agencies. The Secretariat's total funding available for use is reduced accordingly. The remaining 41 per cent is accounted for by public service employer payments, which go to paying the employer's share of the contributions to employee pensions and benefits plans, including statutory payments.
Overall, planned spending is projected to decrease by $800 million from 2014– to 2016–. This amount is based on an expected decrease of $877 million in spending, of which $850 million is due to a decrease in paylist-related expenditures following the elimination of severance benefits for voluntary separation (i.e., for retirement or resignation), offset by a projected increase of $77 million in spending—largely for an expected increase in Public Service Health Care Plan usage, an increase in service costs to deliver the Pensioners' Dental Services Plan and the Public Service Dental Care Plan, and higher employer contributions directly related to increases in the payroll envelope.
Actual spending increased by $329 million from 2013– to 2014–. This was primarily to address a funding shortfall within the plan to provide benefits to the increased number of medically released Canadian Armed Forces members following the Afghanistan mission, and to implement approved benefit changes to the Public Service Health Care Plan totalling $268 million. In addition, there was an increase of $61.6 million mostly attributable to new funding received for the payout of an out-of-court settlement to eligible claimants under the White class action lawsuit launched against the Crown, Buote Estate v. Canada, 2014 FC 773 (CanLII), involving the elimination of the Pension Act offset provision under the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Long Term Disability Insurance Plan.
For the previous year, actual spending from 2012– to 2013– increased by $130.5 million. This was mainly due to an increase in disability and health care expenditures, offset by reduced recoveries from the departments that remit the employer's share of public service insurance benefits related to their employees.
Alignment of Spending With the Whole-of-Government Framework
Strategic Outcome | Program | Spending Area | Government of Canada Outcome | 2014-15 Actual Spending |
---|---|---|---|---|
Government is well managed and accountable, and resources are allocated to achieve results. |
1.1 Management Frameworks | Government Affairs | Well-managed and efficient government operations | 54,481,225 |
1.2 People Management | Government Affairs | Well-managed and efficient government operations | 128,785,777 | |
1.3 Expenditure Management | Government Affairs | Well-managed and efficient government operations | 30,431,157 | |
1.4 Financial Management | Government Affairs | Well-managed and efficient government operations | 31,231,325 | |
1.5 Government-Wide Funds and Public Service Employer Payments | Government Affairs | Well-managed and efficient government operations | 2,898,360,909 |
Spending Area | Total Planned Spending | Total Actual Spending |
---|---|---|
Note: The figures above do not include Internal Services. | ||
Economic Affairs | N/A | N/A |
Social Affairs | N/A | N/A |
International Affairs | N/A | N/A |
Government Affairs | 7,286,498,511 | 3,143,290,393 |
Departmental Spending Trend
The Secretariat spent a total of $3.2 billion toward achieving its Strategic Outcome. Approximately 10 per cent of its total spending was directly related to operating expenditures. Most of the remainder related to Public Service Employer Payments, which the Secretariat manages in its role as the employer for the core public administration.
Total spending for Public Service Employer Payments was $2.5 billion in 2014–. The amount includes payments made toward 16 public service benefit plans and their associated administrative expenditures. Statutory payments, which relate to the employer contributions made under the Public Service Superannuation Act and other retirement acts and the Employment Insurance Act, totalled $444 million.
In general, the Secretariat's operating expenditures include salaries, non-salary costs to deliver programs, and statutory items. These items primarily consist of contributions to the Secretariat's employee benefit plans.
There was an increase of $61.7 million in total program expenditures between 2012– and 2014–. The increase was mostly due to new funding received for the payout of an out-of-court settlement to eligible claimants under the White class action lawsuit. The subsequent decrease between 2014– actual spending and 2015– planned spending was mostly related to the payout of the same out-of-court settlement, as well as to reduced funding related to the Web Renewal initiative.
Decreases in program expenditures are expected to continue until 2017–, due to the sunsetting of initiatives such as the Workspace Renewal initiative, the Joint Learning Program, the Web Renewal initiative, the Federal Contaminated Sites Action Plan, and the Workplace Wellness and Productivity Strategy.
In general, expenditures for public service employer payments and statutory items include the employer's share of contributions required by the insurance plans sponsored by the Government of Canada. They also include statutory payments made under the Public Service Pension Adjustment Act and employer contributions made under the Public Service Superannuation Act, the Employment Insurance Act, and related acts.
Expenditures for public service insurance increased by $129 million from 2012– to 2013– following:
- A premium rate increase to the employer for the Disability Insurance Plan;
- Reinstatement of premiums for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Long Term Disability Plan; and
- Higher usage of the Public Service Health Care Plan.
This increase was offset by reduced recoveries from designated government departments that remit the employer's share of public insurance benefits related to their employees.
Public service employer payments increased by $268 million from 2013– to 2014–. This increase was mostly to address a funding shortfall within the plan to provide benefits to the increased number of medically released Canadian Armed Forces members following the Afghanistan mission. It was also due to the implementation of the changes to the Public Service Health Care Plan negotiated in 2014 that increased premiums for pensioners with a view to achieving a 50-50 cost-sharing ratio with pensioners by .
Planned spending between 2015– and 2017– is expected to increase by $87 million, largely due to an expected increase in Public Service Health Care Plan usage, an increase in service costs under the Pensioners' Dental Services Plan and the Public Service Dental Care Plan, and higher employer contributions directly related to increases in the payroll envelope.
Estimates by Vote
For information on the Secretariat's organizational Votes and statutory expenditures, consult the Public Accounts of Canada 2014 on the Public Works and Government Services Canada website.
Page details
- Date modified: