Invasive group A streptococcal (iGAS) surveillance in Canada

CCDR

Volume 48-9, September 2022: Invasive Diseases Surveillance in Canada

Surveillance

Invasive group A streptococcal disease surveillance in Canada, 2020

Alyssa Golden1, Averil Griffith1, Walter Demczuk1, Gregory Tyrrell2, Julianne Kus3,4, Allison McGeer5, Marc-Christian Domingo6, Linda Hoang7, Jessica Minion8, Paul Van Caeseele9, Hanan Smadi10, David Haldane11, George Zahariadis12, Kristen Mead13, Laura Steven14, Lori Strudwick15, Anita Li16, Michael Mulvey1,17, Irene Martin1

Affiliations

1 National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB

2 Provincial Laboratory for Public Health (Microbiology), Edmonton, AB

3 Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON

4 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON

5 Toronto Invasive Bacterial Diseases Network (TIBDN), Department of Microbiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON

6 Laboratoire de santé publique du Québec, Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC

7 British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC

8 Roy Romanow Provincial Laboratory, Regina, SK

9 Cadham Provincial Laboratory, Winnipeg, MB

10 New Brunswick Department of Health, Fredericton, NB

11 Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Centre, Halifax, NS

12 Newfoundland and Labrador Public Health Laboratory, St. John's, NL

13 Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Charlottetown, PE

14 Stanton Territorial Hospital Laboratory, Yellowknife, NT

15 Yukon Communicable Disease Control, Whitehorse, YT

16 Centre for Immunization & Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON

17 Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB

Correspondence

alyssa.golden@phac-aspc.gc.ca

Suggested citation

Golden AR, Griffith A, Demczuk WHB, Tyrrell GJ, Kus JV, McGeer A, Domingo M-C, Hoang L, Minion J, Van Caeseele P, Smadi H, Haldane D, Zahariadis G, Mead K, Steven L, Strudwick L, Li AY, Mulvey MR, Martin I. Invasive group A streptococcal disease surveillance in Canada, 2020. Can Commun Dis Rep 2022;48(9):407-14. https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v48i09a05

Keywords: iGAS, Streptococcus pyogenes, Canada, emm, surveillance, antimicrobial resistance, group A streptococcus

Abstract

Background: Invasive group A streptococcal (iGAS) disease (caused by Streptococcus pyogenes) has been a nationally notifiable disease in Canada since 2000. This report summarizes the demographics, emm types and antimicrobial resistance of iGAS infections in Canada in 2020.

Methods: The Public Health Agency of Canada's National Microbiology Laboratory (Winnipeg, Manitoba) collaborates with provincial and territorial public health laboratories to conduct national surveillance of invasive S. pyogenes. Emm typing was performed on all isolates using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention emm sequencing protocol. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Population-based iGAS disease incidence rates up to 2019 were obtained through the Canadian Notifiable Disease Surveillance System.

Results: Overall, the incidence of iGAS disease in Canada has increased from 4.0 to 8.1 cases per 100,000 population from 2009 to 2019. The 2019 incidence represents a slight decrease from the 2018 rate of 8.6 cases per 100,000 population. A total of 2,867 invasive S. pyogenes isolates that were collected during 2020 are included in this report, representing a decrease from 2019 (n=3,194). The most common emm types in 2020 were emm49 (16.8%, n=483) and emm76 (15.0%, n=429), both increasing significantly in prevalence since 2016 (p<0.001). The former most prevalent type, emm1, decreased to 7.6% (n=217) in 2020 from 15.4% (n=325) in 2016. Antimicrobial resistance rates in 2020 included 11.5% resistance to erythromycin, 3.2% resistance to clindamycin and 1.6% nonsusceptibility to chloramphenicol.

Conclusion: Though the number of collected invasive S. pyogenes isolates decreased slightly in 2020 in comparison to previous years, iGAS disease remains an important public health concern. The emm distribution in Canada has been subtly shifting over the past five years, away from common and well-known emm1 and towards emm49 and emm76. It is important to continue surveillance of S. pyogenes in Canada to monitor expanding replacement emm types, as well as outbreak clones and antimicrobial resistance.

Introduction

Invasive group A Streptococcus (Streptococcus pyogenes) is responsible for a wide range of human diseases, the most serious of which include bacteraemia, streptococcal toxic shock syndrome, necrotizing fasciitis and endocarditisFootnote 1. In Canada, the incidence of invasive group A streptococcal (iGAS) infections is increasing; doubling from 4.0 cases per 100,000 population in 2009 to 8.1 cases per 100,000 in 2019Footnote 2. Though iGAS disease is a global cause of morbidity and mortalityFootnote 3, many studies have indicated that certain populations are at particular risk of disease, including those who are disadvantaged or living in overcrowded conditionsFootnote 4Footnote 5.

The M protein, encoded by the emm gene, is an important virulence factor and an epidemiological marker used to characterize S. pyogenes isolatesFootnote 1. A significant amount of iGAS disease is caused by a small number of emm types; however, shifts in prevalence can cause substantial temporal and geographic variability. Studies have noted frequent fluctuations in emm type prevalence in so-called "epidemic behaviour", where new, emerging strains ultimately replace those previously circulatingFootnote 1Footnote 6. Furthermore, the accumulation of mutations through acquisition of exogenous DNA may result in more virulent clones expanding in prevalence or causing new outbreaks of disease in vulnerable populationsFootnote 6.

As rapid clonal spread and outbreaks of iGAS disease continue to occur in CanadaFootnote 4Footnote 5Footnote 6, it has become increasingly important to monitor the constantly shifting virulence patterns associated with this organism. This report provides a summary of invasive S. pyogenes isolates collected in Canada in 2020.

Methods

Surveillance program

Surveillance of iGAS infections in Canada consists of a passive, laboratory-based system where invasive S. pyogenes isolates from all provincial and territorial public health laboratories (except Alberta) are sent to the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) in Winnipeg for further testing. A total of 2,867 invasive S. pyogenes isolates were reported in 2020, including 1) 2,409 isolates submitted directly to NML by provincial and territorial public health laboratories and 2) data for a further 458 isolates collected and tested by the Provincial Laboratory for Public Health in Edmonton, Alberta (ProvLab Alberta) (Table 1). Isolates are collected from sterile clinical isolation sites, which include blood, cerebrospinal fluid, deep tissue, biopsy and surgical samples, bone and any clinical sources associated with necrotizing fasciitis or toxic shock syndrome.

Table 1: Number of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes isolates collected by each Canadian province/region, 2020

Province
Age group (years) Not given Total
Younger than 2 2–4 5–14 15–49 50–64 65 and older
British Columbia 2 1 4 159 104 67 1 338
Alberta 16 3 9 248 121 61 0 458
Saskatchewan 13 2 3 168 58 28 0 272
Manitoba 12 10 4 114 70 58 0 268
Ontario 10 6 18 458 274 294 3 1,063
Quebec 12 7 8 143 74 101 0 345
New Brunswick 2 0 3 25 14 8 1 53
AtlanticTable 1 footnote a 2 1 5 48 25 17 1 99
NorthernTable 1 footnote b 0 1 0 11 11 1 0 24
Total 67 31 51 1,349 737 627 5 2,867

Population-based incidence of iGAS disease up to 2019 was obtained through Canadian Notifiable Disease Surveillance System (CNDSS). Population data for incidence rates were obtained from Statistics Canada's July 1st annual population estimates.

Isolate testing

Streptococcus pyogenes isolates were confirmed by a positive PYR (pyrrolidonyl-β-naphthylamide) reaction and susceptibility to bacitracinFootnote 7. Emm typing was performed on all iGAS isolates submitted to NML and ProvLab Alberta using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) emm sequencing protocol. The sequences obtained were compared with the CDC emm database and results reported to the subtype level. Antimicrobial susceptibilities for S. pyogenes (n=2,375) were determined using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion for chloramphenicol (30 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), clindamycin (2 μg), penicillin (10 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg) and vancomycin (30 μg) according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelinesFootnote 8.

Supplementary testing was performed on a subset of emm1 isolates to determine the prevalence of the novel M1UK lineage. Genotypes for M1UK isolates were determined by mapping whole genome sequencing reads against reference strain MGAS5005 and identifying 27 characteristic genomic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), as previously described Footnote 9Footnote 10.

Data analysis

Data submitted with bacterial isolates included patient age, sex, clinical source, province and date of collection. Multiple isolates with the same emm type and collected from the same patient within 14 days were counted once with the most invasive isolation site assigned. Meningitis-related isolates were regarded as most invasive, followed by blood and then other sterile sites. The laboratory data were aggregated by age into younger than two, 2–4, 5–14, 15–49, 50–64 and 65 years and older age groups, and regionally into Western (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba), Central (Ontario and Québec), Eastern (New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland and Labrador) and Northern (Yukon Territories, Northwest Territories and Nunavut) regions of Canada. Statistical significance of trends was assessed using the Cochran Armitage test of trend, with a p-value of <0.05 considered significant.

Results

The overall incidence of iGAS disease in Canada decreased slightly in 2019 after successive annual increases from 2009 to 2018. The overall incidence rate in 2019 was 8.1 cases per 100,000 population—twice the rate observed in 2009 (Figure 1, Supplemental material Table S1). In 2020, 2,867 isolates of invasive S. pyogenes were collected, representing a decrease from 2019 (n=3,194).

Figure 1: Annual incidence rates of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes cases in Canada by age group, 2010–2019

Figure 1

Text description: Figure 1

This figure is a bar graph displaying the incidence of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes cases per 100,000 population in Canada from 2009 to 2019, by age group.

Age group 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
<1 9.5 8.5 9.8 9 9.7 9.2 13.9 7.3 8.7 10.6 8.9
1–4 3.7 4.1 5.8 4.9 4.6 5.2 4.4 6.4 6.2 6.6 6.5
5–9 2.7 3.9 4.3 2.9 3.3 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.1 4.4 4.1
10–14 1.7 1.4 2.3 1.5 2 1.4 1.1 1.8 1.7 2.3 1.2
15–19 1.2 1.2 2 1.4 1 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.8 2.2 1.8
20–24 1.7 1.9 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.5 2.7 2.8 3.5 3.9 3.7
25–29 3.3 2.6 2.5 3 3.3 3.7 4.0 5.1 5.1 7.0 6.9
30–39 4.5 4.5 5.2 4.9 5.3 5.3 5.6 7.5 8.3 9.4 9.2
40–59 4 4 4.7 5 5.1 5.1 5.4 6.2 7.8 9.9 9.4
60+ 6.6 7 7.5 7.4 7.2 8.7 8.4 8.7 9.5 12.7 11.8
All ages 4 4.2 4.8 4.7 4.8 5.2 5.3 6.0 6.8 8.6 8.1


Of the 2,867 invasive S. pyogenes isolates tested in 2020, 2,862 (99.8%) had patient ages. Infants younger than two years of age accounted for 1.7% (n=67), toddlers aged 2–4 years for 1.1% (n=31), children aged 5–14 years for 1.8% (n=51), teens/adults aged 15–49 years for 47.1% (n=1,349), adults aged 50–64 years for 25.7% (n=737) and seniors aged 65 years and older for 21.9% (n=627). Five isolates had no ages provided. Isolates from male patients represented 58.1% (n=1,635) of the isolates for which sex information was available. Blood was the main clinical isolation site, accounting for 67.9% (n=1,947) of isolates collected. Additional information on emm types by specimen source can be found in Figures S1 to S5.

The most predominant emm types overall in 2020 were emm49 (16.8%, n=483) and emm76 (15.0%, n=429), which have increased significantly in prevalence since 2016 (from 0.6%, n=12 and 0.4%, n=8, respectively; p<0.001) (Figure 2). Other emm types that demonstrated significantly increasing trends from 2016 to 2020 include emm53 (1.2% to 2.1%, p<0.001), emm77 (1.7% to 2.4%, p=0.005), emm80 (1.0% to 3.4%, p<0.001) and emm92 (0.1% to 2.9%, p<0.001). Other emm types demonstrated significantly decreasing trends (see Figure 2), such as emm1 from 15.4% (n=325) of all invasive S. pyogenes isolates collected in 2016, to only 7.6% (n=217) in 2020 (p<0.001). Of note, 33% (n=138) of emm1 isolates sequenced in 2019 were the novel M1UK lineage; in comparison, only three M1UK isolates were identified in 2015.

Figure 2: Prevalence of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes emm types in Canada, 2016–2020Figure 2 footnote aFigure 2 footnote bFigure 2 footnote c

Figure 2

Text description: Figure 2

This figure is a bar graph displaying the percentage of Streptococcus pyogenes emm types from all age groups from 2016 to 2020, based on the total number of isolates tested annually.

Emm type 2016
(n=2,108)
2017
(n=2,475)
2018
(n=3,206)
2019
(n=3,253)
2020
(n=2,867)
1 (325,449,547,396,217)Figure 2 footnote a 15.4% 18.1% 17.1% 12.2% 7.6%
2 (31,33,53,34,30) 1.5% 1.3% 1.7% 1.0% 1.0%
3 (132,61,88,115,31) 6.3% 2.5% 2.7% 3.5% 1.1%
4 (98,86,102,95,46) 4.6% 3.5% 3.2% 2.9% 1.6%
6 (57,48,109,87,72) 2.7% 1.9% 3.4% 2.7% 2.5%
9 (11,41,45,21,11) 0.5% 1.7% 1.4% 0.6% 0.4%
11 (64,68,72,78,69) 3.0% 2.7% 2.2% 2.4% 2.4%
12 (137,147,145,136,61) 6.5% 5.9% 4.5% 4.2% 2.1%
22 (25,25,30,34,24) 1.2% 1.0% 0.9% 1.0% 0.8%
28 (97,126,164,160,80) 4.6% 5.1% 5.1% 4.9% 2.8%
41 (37,55,47,64,62) 1.8% 2.2% 1.5% 2.0% 2.2%
49 (12,70,99,281,483) 0.6% 2.8% 3.1% 8.6% 16.8%
53 (26,37,131,142,59) 1.2% 1.5% 4.1% 4.4% 2.1%
59 (49,57,35,49,66) 2.3% 2.3% 1.1% 1.5% 2.3%
68 (40,25,24,7,10) 1.9% 1.0% 0.7% 0.2% 0.3%
74 (124,234,373,249,190) 5.9% 9.5% 11.6% 7.7% 6.6%
75 (33,41,60,59,46) 1.6% 1.7% 1.9% 1.8% 1.6%
76 (8,74,205,396,429) 0.4% 3.0% 6.4% 12.2% 15.0%
77 (36,33,64,77,68) 1.7% 1.3% 2.0% 2.4% 2.4%
80 (22,9,9,27,97) 1.0% 0.4% 0.3% 0.8% 3.4%
81 (160,225,199,191,205) 7.6% 9.1% 6.2% 5.9% 7.2%
82 (104,63,68,34,74) 4.9% 2.5% 2.1% 1.0% 2.6%
83 (32,38,58,49,51) 1.5% 1.5% 1.8% 1.5% 1.8%
87 (37,29,40,40,29) 1.8% 1.2% 1.2% 1.2% 1.0%
89 (107,136,144,170,105) 5.1% 5.5% 4.5% 5.2% 3.7%
91 (38,34,27,39,60) 1.8% 1.4% 0.8% 1.2% 2.1%
92 (3,14,64,36,84) 0.1% 0.6% 2.0% 1.1% 2.9%
94 (7,5,11,22,11) 0.3% 0.2% 0.3% 0.7% 0.4%
101 (110,87,50,49,12) 5.2% 3.5% 1.6% 1.5% 0.4%
102 (5,8,8,11,14) 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.3% 0.5%
Other (141,117,135,105,71) 6.7% 4.7% 4.2% 3.2% 2.5%


In 2020, the most common emm type from children younger than two years of age was emm49 (20.9%, n=14), while emm1 predominated for children 2–4 years (41.9%, n=13) and 5–14 years (37.3%, n=19) (Figure S6). In patients aged 15–49 and 50–64 years, emm49 was most common (17.9%, n=242; 17.9%, n=132, respectively), followed by emm76 (16.3%, n=220; 14.2%, n=105). For adults 65 years and older, emm76 (14.4%, n=90) and emm49 (14.2%, n=89) were also most common, but emm1 was also frequently identified (12.0%, n=75) (Figure S7). Emm types associated with Western Canada (Figure 3) included emm49 (16.2%, n=217), emm76 (15.9%, n=213), emm74 (11.2%, n=150) and emm81 (9.1%, n=122). In Central Canada, emm49 (17.1%, n=240) and emm76 (14.8%, n=209) were predominant, while emm49 (26.3%, n=26) and emm75 (14.1%, n=14) were most common in Eastern Canada. Isolates from Northern Canada were highly represented by emm1 at 25.0% (n=6), though only 24 isolates were submitted from this region (Figures S8 to S11).

Figure 3: Regional distribution of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes isolates collected in 2020, by emm typeFigure 3 footnote a

Figure 3

Text description: Figure 3

This figure is a stacked bar graph displaying the number of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes isolates collected from each Canadian region in 2020, by emm type.

Emm type Western
(n=1,336)
Central
(n=1,408)
Eastern
(n=99)
Northern
(n=24)
1 (6,12,138,61)Figure 3 footnote a 61 138 12 6
2 (0,2,19,9) 9 19 2 0
3 (0,0,24,7) 7 24 0 0
4 (0,1,39,6) 6 39 1 0
6 (1,1,31,39) 39 31 1 1
9 (0,0,10,1) 1 10 0 0
11 (4,4,22,39) 39 22 4 4
12 (0,0,44,17) 17 44 0 0
22 (0,0,17,7) 7 17 0 0
28 (0,6,53,21) 21 53 6 0
41 (0,0,14,48) 48 14 0 0
49 (0,26,240,217) 217 240 26 0
53 (1,0,41,17) 17 41 0 1
59 (0,1,6,59) 59 6 1 0
68 (0,0,6,4) 4 6 0 0
74 (4,3,33,150) 150 33 3 4
75 (0,14,26,6) 6 26 14 0
76 (5,2,209,213) 213 209 2 5
77 (1,1,27,39) 39 27 1 1
80 (0,1,90,6) 6 90 1 0
81 (0,11,72,122) 122 72 11 0
82 (0,1,41,32) 32 41 1 0
83 (1,0,5,45) 45 5 0 1
87 (0,4,19,6) 6 19 4 0
89 (0,9,68,28) 28 68 9 0
91 (0,0,12,48) 48 12 0 0
92 (1,0,33,50) 50 33 0 1
94 (0,0,11,0) 0 11 0 0
101 (0,0,1,11) 11 1 0 0
102 (0,0,13,1) 1 13 0 0
Other (0,0,44,27) 27 44 0 0


Upon request, NML provides assistance to provincial and territorial public health laboratories for S. pyogenes outbreak investigations. During 2020, NML assisted in six outbreak investigations from various jurisdictions, including emm6.4 (n=224 cases), emm74 (n=3), emm81 (n=9), emm92 (n=5) and two multi-emm type outbreaks (emm1, emm74, emm76 and emm92, n=14; emm1, emm76 and emm77, n=10).

Antimicrobial resistance among invasive S. pyogenes isolates remained low in 2020 (Figure 4, Table S2). After dropping to 8.5% (n=235) in 2019, erythromycin resistance increased to 11.5% (n=273) in 2020; however, the overall increase from 2016 to 2020 was not statistically significant. Chloramphenicol nonsusceptibility decreased significantly from 4.7% in 2016 to 1.6% in 2020 (p<0.001), and clindamycin resistance has remained relatively stable over the previous three years (3.0%–3.4%). There was no resistance observed to penicillin or vancomycin. Emm types associated with erythromycin and clindamycin resistance included emm11 (88.6%, n=39; 79.5%, n=35); emm77 (80.8%. n=42; 78.8%, n=41) emm83 (45.7%, n=21; 47.8%, n=22) and emm92 (97.4%, n=74; 93.4%, n=71; respectively) (Figure S12, Table S3).

Figure 4: Antimicrobial resistance of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes in Canada, 2016–2020

Figure 4

Text description: Figure 4

This figure is a line graph displaying the percentage of all invasive Streptococcus pyogenes isolates determined to be clarithromycin-resistant, clindamycin-resistant and chloramphenicol-nonsusceptible each year, from 2016 to 2020.

Isolates 2016
(n=1,771)
2017
(n=2,055)
2018
(n=2,764)
2019
(n=2,773)
2020
(n=2,375)
CHL-NS 4.7% 5.0% 2.6% 1.6% 1.6%
ERY-R 8.8% 10.0% 9.6% 8.5% 11.5%
CLI-R 4.0% 6.8% 3.4% 3.0% 3.2%


Discussion

In 2019, 3,054 cases of iGAS disease were reported to CNDSS, with a national incidence rate of 8.1 cases per 100,000 population; more than double the lowest recorded national incidence (2.7 cases per 100,000 population in 2004) since iGAS disease became notifiable in Canada in 2000. Other countries have noted similar increases in iGAS disease over time Footnote 11Footnote 12Footnote 13Footnote 14, and have hypothesized that the overall increase could be due to increasing molecular diversity of the M protein, or expansion of particularly virulent strains of S. pyogenesFootnote 13Footnote 14. Horizontal gene transfer of large regions of genetic material has resulted in a number of unusually virulent clones that have become dominant worldwide, such as the pandemic emm1 clone that resulted from acquisition of a 36kb region, resulting in increased expression of the cytotoxins nga (NADase) and slo (streptolysin O)Footnote 15. It has also been shown that in addition to increased toxin expression, no or low capsule production may also support the expansion of successful lineages Footnote 16; examples include emm89, emm28 and emm87Footnote 16Footnote 17.

The number of invasive S. pyogenes isolates collected by NML decreased from 3,194 in 2019 to 2,867 in 2020. Though 2020 incidence data for iGAS disease was unavailable at the time of writing, it is likely there was a slight decrease between 2019 and 2020. This decrease may have been an indirect effect of the containment measures put in place in 2020 to prevent the spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic virus. Several studies have noted that there was decreased invasive disease due to respiratory-transmitted pathogens in 2020; among other routes, S. pyogenes may also be transmitted via respiratory droplets, so the same non-pharmaceutical public health measures put in place to prevent the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may have prevented some spread of S. pyogenes, resulting in fewer cases of iGAS disease. The Invasive Respiratory Infection Surveillance Initiative noted worldwide decreases in invasive diseases caused by respiratory pathogens Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Neisseria meningitidis due to containment measures and social changes caused by the pandemic Footnote 18. A Houston, Texas area hospital also identified a decrease in invasive pneumococcal disease and iGAS disease in 2020 due to COVID-19 containment measuresFootnote 19.

The most prevalent emm type collected in Canada over the past decade was emm1, accounting for over 25% of reported iGAS cases in the early 2010s and reflecting levels reported in Europe and North AmericaFootnote 20. Although emm1 has decreased in prevalence in Canada since 2014, an increasing number of sequenced isolates (138 isolates in 2019 in comparison to three in 2015) are the novel, hypertoxigenic M1UK lineage originally described by Lynskey et al.Footnote 10. Recent publications indicated that the prevalence of this lineage is variable: 64% of sequences emm1 isolates in the Netherlands grouped with M1UK, while the United States has not seen significant expansion Footnote 21Footnote 22. It will be crucial to monitor the expansion of this lineage in Canada and determine whether it results in increasing prevalence or outbreaks of emm1.

Despite decreasing in prevalence for a number of years, emm1 has only been surpassed by emm76 in 2019Footnote 2, and by emm49 in 2020, each of which accounted for fewer than 1% of reported iGAS cases in 2016. Many outbreaks of iGAS disease across Canada in recent years have been due to emm76 and emm49 (unpublished data). Emm type replacements such as these may often be driven by low population immunity to rare emm types, and intensified transmission of disease within at-risk populations such as people experiencing homelessness (PEH), people who inject drugs (PWID) and other closed/semi-closed populations; in fact, it has been noted that the distribution of emm types varies between non-risk and at-risk groups, and even between different risk groupsFootnote 14Footnote 23. Valenciano et al. observed that the emm distribution in the United States varied between PEH, PWID and those with both risk factors Footnote 23. Rapid expansion of previously uncommon emm types has been noted recently in a number of countries: emm74 in various disadvantaged groups across Canada; emm6 in a semi-closed population of military trainees in Canada; emm26.3 in PEH in the United States; and emm66 in PEH/PWID in EnglandFootnote 4Footnote 5Footnote 24Footnote 25.

Streptococcus pyogenes remains susceptible to penicillinthe most commonly chosen antimicrobial treatment for iGAS infections, however, there is growing resistance to second-line agents such as macrolides and clindamycinFootnote 1. In 2020, common emm types in Canada that had high levels (more than 40%) of erythromycin and clindamycin resistance included emm11, emm77, emm83 and emm92, and two of these types (emm77, emm92) also demonstrated increasing prevalence from 2016 to 2020. These emm types were also found to be significant sources of macrolide/lincosamide resistance in countries such as Spain and the United StatesFootnote 26Footnote 27, with the latter study also noting increases over time of emm11, emm77 and emm92Footnote 27. Importantly, all four emm types are included in an investigational 30-valent M-protein-based vaccine currently undergoing clinical trialsFootnote 28. Further clinical development and eventual use of this vaccine worldwide could help to reduce the burden of disease associated with antimicrobial resistant emm types.

Strengths and limitations

Caution should be exercised when interpreting the data presented in this report as the overall interpretation of the results is limited to only isolates available for testing. Only a subset of laboratory isolates from each province may have been submitted for testing and therefore this report does not reflect the true incidence or rates of disease in Canada. The representativeness of the proportions of isolates submitted for testing to NML as compared to the CNDSS are presented in Table S4. Not all provinces and territories report line list data to CNDSS and therefore only aggregated data are available at the national level; therefore, CNDSS data and NML laboratory data are presented differently in terms of age grouping.

Conclusion

Although the number of isolates collected decreased in 2020 in comparison to previous years, iGAS disease remains an important public health concern. In the past five years the emm distribution in Canada has shifted away from the common and well-known emm1 and towards previously uncommon emm49 and emm76. Continued surveillance of invasive S. pyogenes in Canada is imperative to monitor these expanding replacement emm types, as well as outbreak clones and antimicrobial resistance.

Authors' statement

  • ARG — Formal analysis, data curation, visualization, writing–original draft, review and editing of final version
  • AG — Formal analysis, validation, investigation, data curation, visualization, writing–review and editing
  • WHBD — Formal analysis, validation, investigation, data curation, visualization, writing–review and editing
  • GJT — Resources, methodology, writing–review and editing
  • JVK — Resources, methodology, writing–review and editing
  • AM — Resources, methodology, writing–review and editing
  • MCD — Resources, methodology, writing–review and editing
  • LH — Resources, methodology, writing–review and editing
  • JM — Resources, methodology, writing–review and editing
  • PVC — Resources, methodology, writing–review and editing
  • HS — Resources, methodology, writing–review and editing
  • DH — Resources, methodology, writing–review and editing
  • GZ — Resources, methodology, writing–review and editing
  • KM — Resources, methodology, writing–review and editing
  • LS — Resources, methodology, writing–review and editing
  • LS — Resources, methodology, writing–review and editing
  • AYL — Writing–review and editing
  • MRM — Methodology, writing–review and editing
  • IM — Conceptualization, validation, methodology, supervision, project administration, writing–review and editing

Competing interests

None.

Acknowledgements

We thank A Yuen, R Mallari, and G Severini from the Streptococcus and Sexually Transmitted Diseases Unit at National Microbiology Laboratory for their laboratory technical assistance, and the staff of provincial and public health laboratories in Canada for participating in the national laboratory surveillance program.

Funding

This project was supported by internal funding from the Public Health Agency of Canada.

Supplemental material

These documents can be accessed on the Supplemental material file.

Table S1: Annual incidence rates of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes cases in Canada by age group, 2009–2019

Figure S1: Clinical isolation sites of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes from children younger than 15 years of age in 2020 (n=149)

Figure S2: Clinical isolation sites of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes from patients 15 years of age and older in 2020 (n=2,718)

Figure S3: Percentage of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes isolates from blood in 2020, by emm type (n=1,947)

Figure S4: Percentage of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes isolates from other sterile sites in 2020, by emm type (n=910)

Figure S5: Percentage of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes isolates from cerebrospinal fluid in 2020, by emm type (n=10)

Figure S6: Prevalence of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes emm types isolated in 2020 for those younger than two, 2–4 and 5–14 years old

Figure S7: Prevalence of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes emm types isolated in 2020 for those 15–49, 50–64 and 65 years and older

Figure S8: Prevalence of the ten most common invasive Streptococcus pyogenes emm types collected from Western Canada in 2020

Figure S9: Prevalence of the ten most common invasive Streptococcus pyogenes emm types collected from Central Canada in 2020

Figure S10: Prevalence of the ten most common invasive Streptococcus pyogenes emm types collected from Eastern Canada in 2020

Figure S11: Prevalence of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes emm types collected from Northern Canada in 2020

Table S2: Antimicrobial resistant invasive Streptococcus pyogenes isolates by year, 2016–2020

Figure S12: Percentage of macrolide and lincosamide resistant invasive Streptococcus pyogenes isolates collected in 2020, by emm type

Table S3: Percentage of macrolide and lincosamide resistant invasive Streptococcus pyogenes isolates collected in 2020, by emm type

Table S4: Number of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes isolates typed by the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) in comparison to the total number of cases reported to Canadian Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (CNDSS) in 2019, by patient age group

Page details

Date modified: