National Influenza Annual Report, Canada, 2020–2021

CCDR

Volume 47 No. 10, October 2021: Influenza Vaccine

Surveillance

National Influenza Annual Report, Canada, 2020–2021, in the global context

Andrea Nwosu1, Liza Lee1, Kara Schmidt1, Steven Buckrell1, Claire Sevenhuysen1, Christina Bancej1

Affiliation

1 Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON

Correspondence

fluwatch-epigrippe@phac-aspc.gc.ca

Suggested citation

Nwosu A, Lee L, Schmidt K, Buckrell S, Sevenhuysen C, Bancej C. National Influenza Annual Report, Canada, 2020–2021, in the global context. Can Commun Dis Rep 2021;47(10):405–13 https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v47i10a02

Keywords: influenza, influenza-like illness, surveillance, pandemic preparedness, outbreaks, COVID-19

Abstract

During the 2020–2021 Canadian influenza season, no community circulation of influenza occurred. Only 69 positive detections of influenza were reported, and influenza percent positivity did not exceed 0.1%. Influenza indicators were at historical lows compared with the previous six seasons, with no laboratory-confirmed influenza outbreaks or severe outcomes being reported by any of the provinces and territories. Globally, influenza circulation was at historically low levels in both the Northern and the Southern Hemispheres. The decreased influenza activity seen in Canada and globally is concurrent with the implementation of non-pharmaceutical public health measures to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Although it is difficult to predict when influenza will begin to re-circulate, given the increased COVID-19 vaccination and the relaxation of public health measures, an influenza resurgence can be expected and may be more severe or intense than recent seasons. Influenza vaccination, along with non-pharmaceutical public health measures, continues to remain the best method to prevent the spread and impact of influenza. Public health authorities need to remain vigilant, maintain surveillance and continue to plan for heightened seasonal influenza circulation.

Introduction

Public health measures implemented to reduce the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have impacted the transmission of influenza in every country around the world, including CanadaFootnote 1Footnote 2Footnote 3Footnote 4. By the middle of Canada's 2020–2021 influenza season (week 50, ending December 12, 2020), seasonal influenza circulation in Canada was at unprecedented lows and had not approached the seasonal thresholdFootnote 5. The following surveillance report provides a summary of Canada's 2020–2021 annual influenza season (August 23, 2020 to August 28, 2021) as well as the 2020–2021 Southern Hemisphere and 2020–2021 Northern Hemisphere influenza surveillance seasons.

FluWatch is a national influenza surveillance program that monitors the transmission of influenza and influenza-like illness (ILI) in Canada. Established in 1996, it is a pan-Canadian surveillance network of laboratories, hospitals, healthcare practitioners, individual Canadians and provincial and territorial ministries of health. The objectives of this program are as follows: 1) to identify signals for timely detection of, and coordinated assessment and response to, epidemics and other events of public health concern; 2) to contribute to the evidence base necessary for planning, development and implementation of health programs and healthy public policies for the control of influenza; and 3) to enable a robust surveillance infrastructure for the timely and relevant response and research necessary to mitigate the impacts of influenzaFootnote 6.

Method

Design

The FluWatch program conducts prospective surveillance on influenza and ILI. Annually, influenza surveillance occurs from epidemiological week 35 to 34 of the following year. The FluWatch program is a composite surveillance system consisting of virologic surveillance, syndromic surveillance, influenza activity level surveillance, outbreak surveillance, severe outcome surveillance and vaccine monitoring.

Indicator definitions

Standardized definitions of the core indicators that are monitored through the FluWatch program and presented in this report are defined in Table 1.

Table 1: FluWatch core indicators used to summarize the 2020–2021 influenza season in Canada
Indicator Definition Calculation Data source
Influenza percent positivity The weekly proportion of diagnostic tests positive for influenza relative to all diagnostic tests conducted.

Numerator: The number of influenza detections.

Denominator: The total number of influenza diagnostic tests processed.

Respiratory Virus Detection Surveillance System and FluNet
Influenza strain characterization The number of influenza isolates characterized by the National Microbiology Laboratory compared to recent Canadian and global isolates and World Health Organization recommended vaccine strain viruses. Counts and proportions antigenically similar/dissimilar to the vaccine strains. National Microbiology Laboratory
Proportion of visits for ILI The weekly proportion of patient-visits to sentinel practitioners due to ILI relative to all patient-visits.

Numerator: The number of patient visits for ILI seen at sentinel sites.

Denominator: The total number of patients seen at sentinel sites for any reason.

Sentinel Practitioner ILI Reporting system
Proportion of FluWatcher participants with ILI The weekly proportion of FluWatcher participants self-reporting cough and fever, relative to all FluWatcher participants.

Numerator: The number of FluWatchers participants reporting cough and fever.

Denominator: The total number of participants reporting to FluWatchers.

FluWatchers
Influenza outbreaks The number of influenza or ILI outbreaks by setting and influenza type. Counts and proportions of outbreaks by setting and influenza/ILI type. Provincial and territorial public health authorities
Influenza-associated hospitalizations The number and rate of hospitalizations that are associated with influenza. Counts and rates per 100,000 population. Provincial and territorial public health authorities, Immunization Monitoring Program Active and Canadian Immunization Research Network
Vaccine effectiveness against medically-attended influenza The proportionate reduction in influenza among those vaccinated, relative to those unvaccinated among medically attended ILI.

Vaccine effectiveness estimates are based on the results of a modified case control study (test negative design) and derived using the following equation:

VE = 100% × (1 – (Opos/Oneg))

where Opos is the odds of vaccination among those testing positive for influenza and Oneg is the odds of vaccination among those testing negative.

Canadian Sentinel Practitioners Surveillance Network
Vaccine effectiveness against influenza associated hospitalization The proportionate reduction in influenza among those vaccinated, relative to those unvaccinated among adults hospitalized for acute respiratory illness.

Vaccine effectiveness estimates are based on the results of a modified case control study (test negative design) and derived using the following equation:

VE = 100% × (1 – (Opos/Oneg))

where Opos is the odds of vaccination among those testing positive for influenza and Oneg is the odds of vaccination among those testing negative.

Canadian Immunization Research Network
Influenza vaccination coverage The percentage of Canadians aged six months and older who received one dose of seasonal influenza vaccine during the current influenza season.

Numerator: number of people who received the influenza vaccine for that season.

Denominator: the number of people eligible for the vaccine that season.

Public Health Agency of Canada's National Influenza Immunization Coverage Survey

Data sources

Canadian virologic data: Aggregate and case-level data on influenza detections are reported to FluWatch through the Respiratory Virus Detection Surveillance SystemFootnote 7. The Respiratory Virus Detection Surveillance System is a sentinel laboratory-based system that monitors the temporal circulation of respiratory viruses in Canada at a national and regional level. This surveillance system consists of 34 laboratories reporting on the number of tests conducted and number of positive specimens for influenza and other respiratory viruses. Specimens from every province and territory are represented in the virologic data. Provincial laboratories provide individual case-level data.

Genetic and antigenic characterization data and antiviral susceptibility data: A proportion of laboratory-confirmed influenza detections undergo genetic and antigenic characterization and antiviral susceptibility testing. Results are provided by the Public Health Agency of Canada's National Microbiology Laboratory.

Global virologic data: FluNet is a global web-based tool for influenza virological surveillanceFootnote 8. Virologic data from national influenza centres and laboratories in 75 countries are reported through this platform. Aggregate data on influenza testing and detections from countries/continents in the Northern (United States, Europe) and Southern Hemisphere (Australia, Chile, South Africa) were extracted from the World Health Organization's FluNet platform on September 11, 2021. Updated numbers of detections from Chile were unavailable in the September 11, 2021, extract from the FluNet database; therefore, a previous data extraction from July 27, 2021, was used.

Activity level and outbreak data: All provincial and territorial public health departments provide a categorical assessment (no activity, sporadic, localized or widespread) of the intensity and geographic spread of influenza (activity level) as well as the number of influenza and ILI outbreaks by setting and type and subtype for surveillance regions within their jurisdictions.

Syndromic data: Syndromic data are reported from two systems: the Sentinel Practitioner ILI Reporting system; and FluWatchers. The Sentinel Practitioner ILI Reporting system consists of healthcare practitioners across Canada who report the number of patients seen with ILI and the total number of patients seen by age group. FluWatchers consists of volunteers across Canada who report whether they had any influenza-like symptoms each week using an online questionnaire.

Severe outcome surveillance data: Data on influenza-associated severe outcomes (i.e. hospitalization, intensive care unit [ICU] admissions and deaths) are reported through three sources: 1) Provincial and territorial ministries of health—severe outcomes surveillance; 2) Canadian Immunization Monitoring Program ACTive; and 3) Canadian Immunization Research Network's Serious Outcomes Surveillance Network.

Provincial/territorial severe outcome surveillance: Nine provincial and territorial ministries of health across Canada (Alberta, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, Yukon and Northwest Territories) participate and report case-level information (age, associated influenza type/subtype) for influenza-associated hospitalizations, ICU admissions and deaths.

Paediatric (16 years of age and younger) influenza-associated severe outcomes data: The Canadian Immunization Monitoring Program ACTive is a sentinel paediatric hospital network that consists of 12 paediatric hospitals across eight provinces in Canada. Detailed case-level information such as age, influenza type/subtype, gender, underlying medical conditions, vaccination status and treatment for influenza-associated hospitalizations, ICU admissions and in-patient deaths are reported on a weekly basis.

Adult (16 years of age and older) influenza-associated severe outcome data: The Canadian Immunization Research Network is a sentinel adult hospital network that consists of ten hospitals across four provinces. This network provides detailed case-level information for influenza-associated hospitalizations, ICU admission and in-patient deaths.

Vaccine monitoring data: Data on influenza vaccine coverage are provided by the Public Health Agency of Canada's National Influenza Immunization Coverage Survey. Vaccine effectiveness data are provided through two networks, the Canadian Sentinel Practitioners Surveillance Network and Canadian Immunization Research Network's Severe Outcome Surveillance. The Canadian Sentinel Practitioners Surveillance Network provides estimates of how well the influenza vaccine prevents primary care visits for influenza. The Canadian Immunization Research Network's Severe Outcome Surveillance estimates how effective the seasonal influenza vaccine is in preventing hospitalization in adults. During a typical influenza surveillance season both interim and final estimates are provided.

Statistical analysis

Temporal and geographic trends in the core surveillance indicators (Table 1) were monitored throughout the season. Case counts and proportions are presented and compared, where available, with historical data from the 2014–2015 to 2019–2020 season. All analyses were performed using SAS PC 9.4 for Windows.

Results

Laboratory-confirmed influenza detections

There was no community circulation of influenza in Canada during the 2020–2021 season. A total of 69 laboratory-confirmed influenza virus detections were reported during the 2020–2021 influenza season, all representing sporadic activity; 31 of these detections were associated with receipt of live attenuated influenza vaccineFootnote 9Footnote 10. Influenza A accounted for 67% (n=46) of reported detections. Only 20 influenza A viruses were subtyped; thus, subtype characteristics of the sporadic detections could not be ascertained.

Despite few reported detections, high levels of influenza testing that were above seasonal averages were maintained throughout the 2020–2021 influenza season, with a total of 632,580 tests reported. Historically, during the non-pandemic surveillance seasons 2014–2015 to 2018–2019, the total number of tests conducted ranged from 237,777 to 391,862. The percentage of laboratory tests positive for influenza remained at exceptionally low levels throughout the 2020–2021 influenza season. The reported percent positivity ranged from 0.0% to 0.1% this season compared to a historical average range of 0.8% to 25.1% while testing through the season was roughly twice the historical average (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Number of influenza tests and percentage of tests positive, in Canada, United States and Europe, by surveillance week

Figure 1

Text description: Figure 1

Northern HemisphereFigure 1 Footnote aFigure 1 Footnote b

Canada:

Left figure: The x-axis shows epidemiological weeks 35 to 34. The y-axis shows the number of influenza tests. Historically, the lowest number of tests (n=1,251) occurred in week 33, the highest number of tests (n=17,681) occurred in week 10. In 2020–2021, the number of tests exceeded historical averages for the whole season and exceeded the historical maximum throughout the entire season with the exception of weeks 53, 1, and 5. The lowest number of tests (n=4,692) occurred in week 31 and the highest number of tests (n=29,154) occurred in week 16.

Right figure: The x-axis shows epidemiological weeks 35 to 34. The y-axis shows the percentage of tests positive for influenza. Historically, the average percent positivity ranged from 0.11% to 35.99% in comparison to 2020–2021 where the percent positivity ranged from 0.00% to 0.07%, a flat trend.

United States:

Left figure: The x-axis shows epidemiological weeks 35 to 34. The y-axis shows the number of influenza tests. Historically, the lowest number of tests (n=3,915) occurred in week 35 and the highest number of tests (n=88,743) occurred in week 5. In 2020–2021, the number of tests fluctuated above and below historical averages and exceeded historical maximum tests between weeks 40 to 50 and weeks 14 to 34. The number of tests did not fall below historical minimum tests at any week. The lowest number of tests (n=6,603) occurred in week 37 and the highest number of tests (n=62,227) occurred in week 1.

Right figure: The x-axis shows epidemiological weeks 35 to 34. The y-axis shows the percentage of tests positive for influenza. Historically, the average percent positivity ranged from 2.37% to 25.21% in comparison to 2020–2021 where the percent positivity ranged from 0.06% to 0.44%, a flat trend.

Europe:

Left figure: The x-axis shows epidemiological weeks 35 to 34. The y-axis shows the number of influenza tests. Historically, the lowest number of tests (n=1,075) occurred in week 35 and the highest number of tests (n=65,292) occurred in week 1. In 2020–2021, the number of tests fluctuated above and below historical averages and exceeded historical maximum tests between weeks 35 to 38 and weeks 14 to 34. In 2020–2021, the number of tests did not fall below historical minimum tests at any week. The lowest number of tests (n=4,128) occurred in week 35 and the highest number of tests (n=40,291) occurred in week 12.

Right figure: The x-axis shows epidemiological weeks 35 to 34. The y-axis shows the percentage of tests positive for influenza. Historically, the average percent positivity ranged from 0.70% to 37.11% in comparison to 2020–2021 where the percent positivity ranged from 0.01% to 0.37%.

Southern HemisphereFigure 1 Footnote aFigure 1 Footnote c

Australia:

Left figure: The x-axis shows epidemiological weeks 1 to 52. The y-axis shows the number of influenza tests. Historically, the lowest number of tests (n=71) occurred in week 1, the highest number of tests (n=3,565) occurred in week 26. In 2020, the number of tests exceeded historical averages for the majority of the season with the exception of weeks 33 to 39 and the number of tests exceeded the historical maximum tests for the majority of the season with the exception of weeks 32 to 43. In 2021 (to week 35), the number of tests exceeded historical averages between weeks 1 to 34, and the number of tests exceeded the historical maximum tests between weeks 1 to 20. In seasons 2020 and 2021, the number of tests did not fall below historical minimum tests at any week. In 2020, the lowest number of tests (n=947) occurred in week 3 and the highest number of tests (n=5,113) occurred in week 29. In 2021 (to week 34), the lowest number of tests (1,368) occurred in week 15 and the highest number of tests (n=3,260) occurred in week 26.

Right figure: The x-axis shows influenza weeks 1 to 52. The y-axis shows the percentage of tests positive for influenza. Historically, the average percent positivity ranged from 4.79% to 25.68% in comparison to seasons 2020 (week 13 onwards) and 2021 (to week 34) where the percent positivity ranged from 0.00% to 0.78%, a flat trend. Prior to week 13 of 2020, the percentage of tests positive for influenza were also generally below the historical minimum values.

South Africa:

Left figure: The x-axis shows epidemiological weeks 1 to 52. The y-axis shows the number of influenza tests. Historically, the lowest number of tests (n=6) occurred in week 1, the highest number of tests (n=373) occurred in week 24. In 2020, the number of tests fluctuated but were comparable to historical averages between weeks 1 to 13, were generally below historical averages between weeks 14 to 39, and exceeded historical averages (and maximum tests) between weeks 40 to 52. In 2020, the number of tests did not fall below historical minimum tests at any week. In 2020, the lowest number of tests (n=20) occurred in week 1 and the highest number of tests (n=201) occurred in week 31. In 2021 (to week 34), the number of tests exceeded historical averages between weeks 1 to 7 and weeks 27 to 34, were comparable to historical averages between weeks 8 to 20 and in week 34, and were below historical averages between weeks 21 to 26. In 2021 (to week 34), the number of tests exceeded the historical maximum tests between weeks 1 to 4 and in week 29 and the number of tests were below historical minimum tests in weeks 22 and 24. In 2021 (to week 34), the lowest number of tests (n=82) occurred in week 13 and the highest number of tests (n=266) occurred in week 29.

Right figure: The x-axis shows influenza weeks 1 to 52. The y-axis shows the percentage of tests positive for influenza. In 2020 and 2021, the percent positivity for influenza showed exceptionally low rates, displaying a low and relatively flat trend from weeks 15 of 2020 onwards. Historically, the average percent positivity ranged from 0.00% to 32.80% in comparison to 2020 (weeks 15 onwards) and 2021 (to week 34) where the percent positivity ranged from 0.0% to 3.7%.

Chile:

Left figure: The x-axis shows epidemiological weeks 1 to 52. The y-axis shows the number of influenza tests. Historically, the lowest number of tests (n=261) occurred in week 10, the highest number of tests (n=3,117) occurred in week 26. In 2020, the number of tests were generally comparable to historical averages between weeks 1 to 7 and weeks 49 and 52, exceeded historical averages between weeks 8 to 21 and were below historical averages between weeks 22 to 49. In 2020, the number of tests exceeded the historical maximum tests between weeks 8 to 15 and the number of tests generally fell below historical minimum tests between weeks 27 and 47. In 2021 (to week 34), the number of tests exceeded historical averages between weeks 1 to 16 and were below historical averages between weeks 17 to 27. In 2021 (to week 34), the number of tests exceeded the historical maximum tests between weeks 1 to 12 and the number of tests were below historical minimum tests on weeks 23 to 35. In 2020, the lowest number of tests (n=345) occurred in week 7 and the highest number of tests (n=2,809) occurred in week 13. In 2021 (to week 34), the lowest number of tests (n=519) occurred in weeks 5 and 6 and the highest number of tests (n=924) occurred in week 34.

Right figure: The x-axis shows influenza weeks 1 to 52. The y-axis shows the percentage of tests positive for influenza. Historically, the average percent positivity ranged from 1.51% to 10.08% in comparison to seasons 2020 (week 13 onwards) and 2021 (to week 27) where the percent positivity ranged from 0.00% to 0.82%, a flat trend. Prior to week 13 of 2020, the percentage of tests positive for influenza were generally above historical averages.


Internationally, a similar trend of decreased circulation of influenza was seen during the 2020 Southern Hemisphere, the 2020–2021 Northern Hemisphere and the 2021 Southern Hemisphere influenza seasons (Figure 1). In the Southern Hemisphere, influenza activity occurred in the first part of the 2020 surveillance season, then decreased and remained at exceptionally low levels as of week 14 of 2020. The reported percent positivity in Australia (range: 0.0%–9.7%), Chile (range: 0.0%–5.8%) and South Africa (range: 0.0%–16.8%) were lower when compared to their respective historical range 4.8%–25.7%, 1.5%–10.1% and 0.0%–32.8%. Similarly, in both the United States and Europe, the percentage of laboratory tests positive for influenza has remained at exceptionally low levels (Figure 1). During the 2020–2021 season, the percent positivity in the United States and Europe did not exceed 0.4% and 0.4%, respectively. Whereas respective historical average percent positivity ranged from 1.6%–25.2% and 0.7%–37.1%. As of week 34 (week 27 for Chile), influenza activity has remained at exceptionally low levels during the 2021 Southern Hemisphere with influenza percent positivity not exceeding 3.9% in Australia, Chile and South Africa (Figure 1).

Strain characterization and antiviral resistance testing

Due to low influenza circulation in Canada, only five influenza viruses were characterized this season, which was significantly lower than what is typically characterized by the National Microbiology Laboratory during an influenza surveillance season (n=1,171 to 3,857 from 2014–2015 to 2019–2020). Of these five viruses, one was a seasonal influenza B virus and the other four were zoonotic infections. All submitted viruses were from Alberta and Manitoba.

The influenza B virus that was characterized was antigenically related to B/Washington/02/2019 (Victoria). The four zoonotic infections were swine influenza variants H1N2v (n=2), H3N2v (n=1) and H1N1v (n=1)Footnote 11Footnote 12Footnote 13Footnote 14.

Syndromic

Both syndromic surveillance programs within FluWatch showed lower than usual activity, which is not unexpected given the lack of community circulation of influenza. Throughout the season, there were small fluctuations in ILI activity (Figure 2). These fluctuations in activity were likely signals of other respiratory virus activity such as enterovirus/rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, adenovirus and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

Figure 2: Percentage of visits for influenza-like illnesses reported by healthcare practitioners sentinel syndromic surveillance and FluWatchers participants reporting fever and coughFigure 2 Footnote a, by surveillance week, Canada, season 2020–2021, compared to historical average

Figure 2

Text description: Figure 2

Healthcare practitioners sentinel surveillance:

Left figure: The x-axis shows epidemiological weeks 35 to 34. The y-axis shows the percentage of visits for influenza-like illness (ILI). Historically, the average percentage of visits for ILI ranged from 0.41% to 3.32%. In comparison to the 2020–2021 season, the percentage of visits for ILI ranged from 0.09% to 0.80%.

Right figure: The x-axis shows epidemiological weeks 35 to 34. The y-axis shows the percentage of participants reporting cough and fever. Historically, the average percentage of participants reporting cough and fever ranged from 1.50% to 3.98%. In comparison to the 2020–2021 season, the percentage of participants reporting cough and fever ranged from 0.06% to 0.49%.


Healthcare practitioners sentinel syndromic surveillance

The healthcare practitioners sentinel ILI surveillance system reported below average percentages of visits due to ILI compared with previous seasons. Weekly percentages of visits due to ILI have ranged from 0.06%–0.49% (compared to the six-year average range of 0.41%–3.32%). This is not unexpected given the changes in healthcare seeking behaviour, the additional healthcare options for individuals with ILI symptoms, a reduction in the number of sentinels reporting and the average number of weekly patients seen. In the previous season, a weekly average of 94 sentinels reported and an average of 8,775 patients were seen compared with the current season's weekly average of 62 sentinels reporting and an average of 5,503 patients seen.

For the majority of the season, the highest weekly percentage of visits for ILI was reported among those younger than 20 years of age. The lowest percentage of visits for ILI was reported among adults 65 years of age and older. This trend was similar to that seen in previous seasons, despite the reduced number of patients and the lower percentages of visits due to ILI.

FluWatchers

The FluWatchers program reported below average percentages of participants reporting fever and cough compared with previous seasons. Weekly percentage of reports of fever and cough have ranged from 0.1%–0.5%, compared to the four-year average range of 1.5%–4.0%. On average 12,048 participants reported weekly (range 9,290–12,831), which is approximately 3.5 times higher than the previous season. FluWatchers reporting is not impacted by changes in health services or health seeking behaviour; however, these low reports of cough and fever may be a direct effect of individual and/or public health measures enacted to reduce the spread of COVID-19.

Similar to the healthcare practitioners sentinel syndromic surveillance, for the majority of the season, the highest weekly percentages of participants reporting cough and fever were among those younger than 20 years of age. The lowest weekly percentages of participants reporting cough and fever were among adults 65 years of age and older. This trend is similar to that seen in previous seasons.

Outbreaks

All outbreaks reported during the season (n=138) were ILI outbreaks in schools and/or daycares. The number of ILI outbreaks in schools and/or daycares was higher compared with the previous two seasons. This is not unexpected given changes to outbreak surveillance, specifically the increased vigilance in schools to monitor and report absenteeism due to ILI, and the increased restrictions on attendance for children with symptoms of viral respiratory illness.

No laboratory-confirmed influenza outbreaks were reported this season.

Severe outcomes

No influenza-associated hospitalizations were reported by participating provinces and territories (Alberta, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northwest Territories, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and Yukon).

No influenza-associated hospitalizations were reported by the adult sentinel influenza hospitalization network (Canadian Immunization Research Network) and fewer than five influenza-associated hospitalizations were reported by the paediatric sentinel influenza hospitalization network (Canadian Immunization Monitoring Program ACTive).

Vaccine monitoring

The World Health Organization recommended that the 2020–21 Northern Hemisphere egg-based influenza vaccine contain the following strainsFootnote 15:

  • A/Guangdong-Maonan/SWL1536/2019 (H1N1)pdm09-like virus
  • A/Hong Kong/2671/2019 (H3N2)-like virus
  • B/Washington/02/2019 (B/Victoria lineage)-like virus
  • B/Phuket/3073/2013 (B/Yamagata lineage)-like virus (quadrivalent vaccine only)

Vaccine coverage

Vaccine coverage for the 2020–2021 influenza season was similar to the previous season. Thirty-two percent of adults 18 to 64 years of age received their influenza vaccineFootnote 10. Vaccine coverage was higher among seniors aged 65 years and older (70%) and adults with chronic medical conditions (40%). Overall vaccine coverage was higher amongst females compared to males.

Vaccine effectiveness

Due to an absence of seasonal influenza circulation no estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness could be produced for Canada nor any Northern or Southern Hemisphere country since the 2019–2020 Northern Hemisphere influenza season.

Discussion

The 2020–2021 Canadian influenza season was characterized by sporadic influenza detection and the absence of sustained circulation of the virus within the community. In Canada, non-pharmaceutical public health measures (i.e. school closures, travel restrictions, mandatory masking and increased handwashing) were implemented in March 2020 and maintained throughout the 2020–2021 flu season to reduce the transmission of COVID-19. Epidemiological analysis of laboratory influenza data have shown that these measures were effective in reducing the incidence and impact of influenza in CanadaFootnote 3Footnote 4. Despite elevated respiratory virus testing this season, only 69 influenza viruses were detected, and influenza percent positivity did not exceed 0.1%. Historically, on average, 52,169 influenza viruses were detected within a season with the percent positivity ranging from 0.8%–25.1%. Decreased influenza circulation was also observed in other countries around the world. Laboratory data submitted to the World Health Organization's FluNet program showed that during the 2020 Southern Hemisphere, 2020–2021 Northern Hemisphere and 2021 Southern Hemisphere influenza seasons, Australia, Chile, South Africa, the United States and countries in Europe also experienced decreased influenza activity for the majority of their surveillance season. As of week 34 of 2021 (week 27 for Chile), laboratory data from the 2021 Southern Hemisphere influenza season showed that influenza activity continued to remain low as public health measures to mitigate COVID-19 remained in place or were reinstated when COVID-19 cases rebounded.

The lack of influenza epidemics has implications that will require increased vigilance. Because of decreased circulation of influenza over the previous two seasons, a lower level of immunity amongst the population, particularly infants and younger children, could lead to higher infection rates once influenza re-circulatesFootnote 15Footnote 16. As well, given the decreased influenza circulation, there may be an increased possibility for influenza vaccine mismatchFootnote 15. Recommendations for the composition of the influenza vaccine virus each year are made by predicting which viruses will circulate in the upcoming surveillance seasonFootnote 17. These predictions are based on laboratory surveillance data indicating which viruses are currently circulatingFootnote 17. Given the paucity of surveillance data due to reduced influenza surveillance and circulation, the ability to accurately predict which viruses will circulate may be diminishedFootnote 15. Furthermore, as COVID-19 vaccination coverage increases and countries start to ease public health measures, influenza strains similar to pre-pandemic years or novel strains may emerge, resulting in larger than normal influenza epidemicsFootnote 15. Although it is currently difficult to predict whether influenza circulation will remain low in Canada and globally for the 2021–2022 influenza season, public health authorities need to remain vigilant and continue to plan for seasonal influenza circulation and maintain laboratory diagnostics and surveillance capacity. Influenza vaccination together with non-pharmaceutical public health measures continue to remain the best methods to prevent the spread and impact of influenza, especially given the uncertainty of the severity and intensity of respiratory virus circulation in the upcoming seasons.

Authors' statement

The FluWatch team in the Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases developed the first draft collaboratively; all authors contributed to the conceptualization, writing and revision of the manuscript.

Competing interests

None.

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to all those across Canada who contribute to influenza surveillance. The FluWatch program consists of a volunteer network of labs, hospitals, doctor's offices, provincial and territorial ministries of health and individual Canadians who contribute as FluWatchers. We also acknowledge the following surveillance and research networks who contribute enhanced surveillance and knowledge exchange on influenza vaccine effectiveness to FluWatch: Canada's Immunization Monitoring Program ACTive, Canadian Immunization Research Network Serious Outcomes Surveillance Network, and the Canadian Influenza Sentinel Practitioner Surveillance Network. Finally, we wish to acknowledge the National Microbiology Laboratory's Influenza and Respiratory Virus section for the strain characterization and antiviral resistance testing data and the Centre for Immunization and Respiratory Infectious Diseases' Vaccination Coverage Section for their analysis of the annual national Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Coverage Surveys.

Funding

FluWatch surveillance is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada.

Page details

Date modified: