Mycoplasma pneumoniae: Infectious substances pathogen safety data sheet
For more information on Mycoplasma pneumoniae, see the following: Infection prevention and control guideline- Prevention of Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia
Section I – Infectious agent
Name
Mycoplasma pneumoniae
Agent type
Bacteria
Taxonomy
Family
Mycoplasmoidaceae
Genus
Mycoplasmoides
Species
Mycoplasmoides pneumoniae
Synonym or cross-reference
Eaton agent, walking pneumonia, primary atypical pneumonia, pleural atypical pneumoniaFootnote 1Footnote 2.
Characteristics
Brief description
Mycoplasmoides pneumoniae is a Gram-negative spindle shaped pleomorphic bacterium, measuring 1-2 μm long by 0.1-0.2 μm wideFootnote 1. M. pneumoniae is motile, using gliding motility instead of pili or flagella. M. pneumoniae lacks a cell wall and has a three-layered membrane containing sterols which provide structural support. The cell membrane is also supported by a protein network which creates a cytoskeleton. M. pneumoniae colonies are up to 100 μm in diameter, primarily colonizing the respiratory tract, and a stereomicroscope is necessary to be able to observe themFootnote 2. The circular genome of M. pneumoniae is 816 kbp long, consisting of 730 genes with an average GC content of 40%Footnote 3.
Properties
M. pneumoniae is considered an atypical pathogen which metabolizes glucoseFootnote 1. It is the smallest self-replicating organism capable of cell-free existenceFootnote 2. The M. pneumoniae genome encodes for proteins that increase the virulence of the bacterium, such as adhesins that help attach to host respiratory epithelial cells, metabolites, and toxins that are released to induce cytotoxicity, oxidative damage, apoptosis, immune-pathological damage to host cells, and immune evasion abilitiesFootnote 4Footnote 5. M. pneumoniae may persist in the respiratory tract for variable time periods even after clinical manifestations no longer appearFootnote 5.
M. pneumoniae particularly adheres to respiratory epithelial cellsFootnote 1Footnote 5. Adherence to host cell surface receptors allows M. pneumoniae to obtain nutrition but induces metabolism and structural changes in the host cellFootnote 6. After adherence, toxins, peroxide, and superoxide are released into host cells to produce cytotoxicity and directly damage the host cell. These components induce the activation of host inflammatory pathways through the upregulated release of pro-inflammatory cytokines which then produces inflammation damage. As M. pneumoniae invades host cells, mechanisms to evade host immune cells are activated. Mechanisms to evade host immunity include releasing nucleases and enzymes to degrade neutrophil extracellular traps and peroxides released by the host cell, intracellular invasion, DNA recombination allowing for greater antigenic variation, and releasing metabolites which damage lymphocytes. The severity of disease is related to the degree of response from the host immune systemFootnote 7.
Section II – Hazard identification
Pathogenicity and toxicity
The majority of M. pneumoniae infections in adults are asymptomatic, but M. pneumoniae is the cause of many upper respiratory tract infections (up to 50% of cases)Footnote 2. Symptoms develop over several days and persist for weeks to months, with common symptoms including sore throat, hoarseness, fever, cough (may be purulent), headaches, coryza, earache, myalgias, chills, and general malaiseFootnote 2Footnote 5. There may also be dyspnea in the more severe cases and, in some cases, the cough may take on a pertussis-like characterFootnote 2.
Some children may develop inflammation of the throat, cervical adenopathy, conjunctivitis, and myringitisFootnote 2. Progression to pneumonia is rare for children under five years of age, but common for those between 5 and 15 years oldFootnote 2. M. pneumoniae is responsible for up to 40% cases of community-acquired pneumonia in children over 5, including primary atypical pneumonia and tracheobronchitisFootnote 1. Infections can be severe in the elderly or immunocompromisedFootnote 2.
Complications may occur before, during, or after respiratory symptoms, and may also occur without respiratory syndromeFootnote 2. The most common complications involve the central nervous system, which up to 10% is severe enough to require hospitalizationFootnote 8. The most common neurological complication in children is encephalitisFootnote 9. Other reported complications include aseptic meningitis, cerebellitis, meningoencephalitis, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, polyneuropathy, stroke/cerebral infarction, coma, optic neuritis, diplopia, mental confusion, acute psychosis, polyradiculitis, and cranial nerve palsyFootnote 2Footnote 8Footnote 10Footnote 11Footnote 12Footnote 13Footnote 14.
Complications affecting the motor system include brachial plexus neuropathy, ataxia, chorioathetosis, and ascending paralysis (Guillain-Barré syndrome)Footnote 9. Musculoskeletal complications such as nonspecific myalgias, arthralgias, and polyarthropathies occur in about 14% of patientsFootnote 2. Up to 25% of infections may lead to dermatological manifestations, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, erythematous macropapular and vesicular rashes, mucositis, erythema multiforme, and toxic epidermal necrolysisFootnote 2Footnote 4. Other reported complications include necrotizing pneumonitis, bladder incontinence, pericarditis, arthritis, atherosclerosis, nephritis, pancreatitis, and anemiaFootnote 2Footnote 13Footnote 15Footnote 16Footnote 17Footnote 18.
Epidemiology
M. pneumoniae occurs worldwide, but there are more cases in temperate climatesFootnote 2Footnote 19. There is a slight gender difference in certain age groupsFootnote 2. The most common age for symptomatic infection is 5-15 years of age, while outbreaks among elderly individuals and infants occur only occasionallyFootnote 19. Outbreaks tend to occur in late summer and early fall, and there are cyclic epidemics every 3-6 years in civilian and military populationsFootnote 1Footnote 2Footnote 19. Infection rates vary between 1.3% to 50% during epidemic periodsFootnote 20. Outbreaks commonly occur in closed or semi-closed communities such as hospitals, schools, military bases, and religious communitiesFootnote 1Footnote 2. Infection is more severe in immunocompromised individuals and those with co-morbid conditions such as functional asplenia, sickle cell disease, and hypogammaglobulinemiaFootnote 2Footnote 5Footnote 7.
Host range
Natural host(s)
Humans are the only known natural host for M. pneumoniaeFootnote 2.
Other host(s)
MiceFootnote 21, guinea pigsFootnote 22, hamstersFootnote 23, baboonsFootnote 24, and chimpanzeesFootnote 25.
Infectious dose
Less than 100 CFUFootnote 19.
Incubation period
4 to over 23 daysFootnote 2.
Communicability
M. pneumoniae is principally transmitted by aerosol inhalation of droplets or contact of droplets with mucous membrane tissues of the respiratory tract, and may be transmitted by fomites to those in close contact with an infected personFootnote 2. As a result, secondary cases among close contacts are frequent, but since the shedding period is long (ranging from 2 to 8 days before onset of symptoms and as long as 14 weeks after infection), contamination may take weeksFootnote 2Footnote 19. A case of transplacental transmission of M. pneumoniae has been reportedFootnote 26.
Section III – Dissemination
Reservoir
HumansFootnote 2.
Zoonosis
None.
Vectors
None.
Section IV – Stability and viability
Drug susceptibility/resistance
M. pneumoniae is susceptible to most common antibiotics such as macrolides (specifically erythromycin, clarithromycin, azithromycin, clindamycin, and moderately pristinamycin, josamycin, spiramycin, and midecamycin), ketolides (specifically telithromycin, cethromycin, and CEM-101), tetracyclines (including doxycycline), and fluoroquinolones (specifically gemifloxacin)Footnote 27. M. pneumoniae shows weaker susceptibility to lincomycin, pefloxacin, chloramphenicol, and gentamicin. M. pneumoniae is resistant to nalidixic acid, cephalosporins, penicillins, rifampicin, sulfonamides, and trimethoprimFootnote 27Footnote 28. M. pneumoniae lacks a cell wall and is therefore resistant to cell wall synthesis inhibitors (e.g. b-lactams, glycopeptides, and fosfomycin)Footnote 27. Some strains of M. pneumoniae are becoming increasingly resistant to macrolidesFootnote 27Footnote 29.
Susceptibility to disinfectants
70% ethanol after 5 minutes of exposure, alkaline detergents at 0.8%, and vaporized hydrogen peroxide (180-1200 ppm) are effective against M. pneumoniaeFootnote 30. Other Mycoplasma are inactivated by Triton X-100 and sodium deoxycholate (0.25% or higher for 30-60 minutes), cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (0.08% or higher for less than 30 minutes), formaldehyde (0.1-0.2%), and incubation with 0.1% beta-propiolactone (for 1-24 hours)Footnote 31.
Physical inactivation
M. pneumoniae is inactivated by heating at 60 oC for 30 minutesFootnote 32, gamma radiation at 25-40 kGyFootnote 33, and UV-radiation at 220 µmw/cm2 for 7.5 secondsFootnote 34.
Survival outside host
If protected from evaporation, M. pneumoniae can survive for one hour in liquid, at least 4 hours in air, and 4 hours on stainless steel at room temperatureFootnote 30Footnote 35Footnote 36. Airborne survival time is generally higher when relative humidity (RH) is lower. 50% of the sample survives for 4 hours at 10% RH, 35% at 25% RH, 20% at 90 % RH and less than 10% at 60% and 80% RHFootnote 36.
Section V – First aid/medical
Surveillance
Monitor for symptoms. Diagnosis can be done through the complement fixation test which measures early IgM response, however this test has low sensitivity and specificityFootnote 1. Serologic tests can also be used, however, results can only be available weeks after the illness, and results vary according to reinfection and immunosuppressive conditions. Culture with immunofluorescent antibody (IFA) test, other particle agglutination antibody assays, and enzyme immunoassays (EIA) can also be used, with higher sensitivity. PCR has been used with the advantages of quick turnaround time and high sensitivity. The current recommendation is a combination of PCR and serologic tests.
Note: The specific recommendations for surveillance in the laboratory should come from the medical surveillance program, which is based on a local risk assessment of the pathogens and activities being undertaken, as well as an overarching risk assessment of the biosafety program as a whole. More information on medical surveillance is available in the Canadian Biosafety Handbook (CBH).
First aid/treatment
Macrolides are the first-line treatment for M. pneumoniae infection, specifically erythromycin (25-50 mg/kg/day for 14 days), clarithromycin (10-15 mg/kg/day for 10 days), and azithromycin (10 mg/kg/day for 3 days)Footnote 37. For suspected macrolide-resistant infections, tetracyclines are recommended, such as doxycycline (4 mg/kg/day for 7-14 days)Footnote 37Footnote 38. However, tetracyclines are contraindicated in young children. Fluoroquinolones are another alternative, but are contraindicated in children as well.
Note: The specific recommendations for first aid/treatment in the laboratory should come from the post-exposure response plan, which is developed as part of the medical surveillance program. More information on the post-exposure response plan can be found in the CBH.
Immunization
No vaccine is currently available in Canada; however, various vaccines have been developed without much effectiveness for protecting against infectionFootnote 4Footnote 39.
Note: More information on the medical surveillance program can be found in the CBH, and by consulting the Canadian Immunization Guide.
Prophylaxis
None.
Note: More information on prophylaxis as part of the medical surveillance program can be found in the CBH.
Section VI – Laboratory hazard
Laboratory-acquired infections
None reported so far.
Note: Please consult the Canadian Biosafety Standard (CBS) and CBH for additional details on requirements for reporting exposure incidents.
Sources/specimens
M. pneumoniae may be found in any type of clinical specimen, but more commonly in respiratory tract specimensFootnote 2.
Primary hazards
Exposure of mucous membranes to infectious material and inhalation of airborne infectious material are primary hazards associated with exposure to M. pneumoniaeFootnote 2.
Special hazards
None.
Section VII – Exposure controls/personal protection
Risk group classification
Mycoplasmoides pneumoniae is a Risk Group 2 Human Pathogen and Risk Group 1 Animal PathogenFootnote 40Footnote 41.
Containment requirements
Containment Level 2 facilities, equipment, and operational practices outlined in the CBS for work involving infectious or potentially infectious materials, animals, or cultures.
Protective clothing
The applicable Containment Level 2 requirements for personal protective equipment and clothing outlined in the CBS are to be followed. The personal protective equipment could include the use of a labcoat and dedicated footwear (e.g., boots, shoes) or additional protective footwear (e.g., boot or shoe covers) where floors may be contaminated (e.g., animal cubicles, PM rooms), gloves when direct skin contact with infected materials or animals is unavoidable, and eye protection where there is a known or potential risk of exposure to splashes.
Note: A local risk assessment will identify the appropriate hand, foot, head, body, eye/face, and respiratory protection, and the personal protective equipment requirements for the containment zone and work activities must be documented.
Other precautions
The high likelihood of infection or disease arising from airborne transmission of M. pneumoniae justifies the use of a BSC or other primary containment devices for activities with open vessel; centrifugation to be carried out in sealed safety cups or rotors that are unloaded using a mechanism that prevents their release. Respiratory protection to be considered when BSC or other primary containment devices cannot be used; inward airflow is required for work involving large animals or large scale activities.
Use of needles and syringes are to be strictly limited. Bending, shearing, re-capping, or removing needles from syringes to be avoided, and if necessary, performed only as specified in standard operating procedures (SOPs). Additional precautions are required with work involving animals or large-scale activities.
For diagnostic laboratories handling primary specimens that may contain M. pneumoniae, the following resources may be consulted:
Section VIII – Handling and storage
Spills
Allow aerosols to settle. Wearing personal protective equipment, gently cover the spill with absorbent paper towel and apply suitable disinfectant, starting at the perimeter and working towards the centre. Allow sufficient contact time before clean up (CBH).
Disposal
All materials/substances that have come in contact with the regulated materials to be completely decontaminated before they are removed from the containment zone or standard operating procedures (SOPs) to be in place to safely and securely move or transport waste out of the containment zone to a designated decontamination area / third party. This can be achieved by using decontamination technologies and processes that have been demonstrated to be effective against the regulated material, such as chemical disinfectants, autoclaving, irradiation, incineration, an effluent treatment system, or gaseous decontamination (CBH).
Storage
The applicable Containment Level 2 requirements for storage outlined in the CBS are to be followed. Primary containers of regulated materials removed from the containment zone to be labelled, leakproof, impact resistant, and kept either in locked storage equipment or within an area with limited access.
Section IX – Regulatory and other information
Canadian regulatory information
Controlled activities with M. pneumoniae require a Pathogen and Toxin licence issued by the Public Health Agency of Canada.
The following is a non-exhaustive list of applicable designations, regulations, or legislations:
- Human Pathogens and Toxins Act and Human Pathogens and Toxins Regulations
- Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act and Transportation of Dangerous Goods Regulations
Last file update
December, 2023
Prepared by
Centre for Biosecurity, Public Health Agency of Canada.
Disclaimer
The scientific information, opinions, and recommendations contained in this Pathogen Safety Data Sheet have been developed based on or compiled from trusted sources available at the time of publication. Newly discovered hazards are frequent and this information may not be completely up to date. The Government of Canada accepts no responsibility for the accuracy, sufficiency, or reliability or for any loss or injury resulting from the use of the information.
Persons in Canada are responsible for complying with the relevant laws, including regulations, guidelines and standards applicable to the import, transport, and use of pathogens in Canada set by relevant regulatory authorities, including the Public Health Agency of Canada, Health Canada, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Environment and Climate Change Canada, and Transport Canada. The risk classification and related regulatory requirements referenced in this Pathogen Safety Data Sheet, such as those found in the Canadian Biosafety Standard, may be incomplete and are specific to the Canadian context. Other jurisdictions will have their own requirements.
Copyright © Public Health Agency of Canada, 2024, Canada
References
- Footnote 1
-
Atkinson, T. P., M. F. Balish, and K. B. Waites. 2008. Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, pathogenesis and laboratory detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32:956-973.
- Footnote 2
-
Waites, K. B., and D. F. Talkington. 2004. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and its role as a human pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 17:697.
- Footnote 3
-
Xiao, L., T. Ptacek, J. D. Osborne, D. M. Crabb, W. L. Simmons, E. J. Lefkowitz, K. B. Waites, T. P. Atkinson, and K. Dybvig. 2015. Comparative genome analysis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. BMC Genomics 16:610.
- Footnote 4
-
Jiang, Z., S. Li, C. Zhu, R. Zhou, and P. H. M. Leung. 2021. Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infections: Pathogenesis and Vaccine Development. Pathogens 10.
- Footnote 5
-
Sánchez-Vargas, F. M., and O. G. Gómez-Duarte. 2008. Mycoplasma pneumoniae—an emerging extra-pulmonary pathogen. Clinical Microbiol Infec 14:105-115.
- Footnote 6
-
Hu, J., Y. Ye, X. Chen, L. Xiong, W. Xie, and P. Liu. 2022. Insight into the Pathogenic Mechanism of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Curr Microbiol 80:14.
- Footnote 7
-
Saraya, T. 2017. Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection: Basics. J Gen Fam Med 18:118-125.
- Footnote 8
-
Tsiodras, S., I. Kelesidis, T. Kelesidis, E. Stamboulis, and H. Giamarellou. 2005. Central nervous system manifestations of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. J Infection 51:343-354.
- Footnote 9
-
Yiş, U., S. H. Kurul, H. Cakmakçi, and E. Dirik. 2008. Mycoplasma pneumoniae: nervous system complications in childhood and review of the literature. Eur J Pediatr 167:973-978.
- Footnote 10
-
Jin, X., Y. Zou, J. Zhai, J. Liu, and B. Huang. 2018. Refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia with concomitant acute cerebral infarction in a child. Medicine 97.
- Footnote 11
-
Keegan, B. M., N. J. Lowry, and J. Y. Yager. 1999. Mycoplasma pneumoniae: a cause of coma in the absence of meningoencephalitis. Pediatr Neurol 21:822-825.
- Footnote 12
-
Pfausler, B., K. Engelhardt, A. Kampfl, H. Spiss, E. Taferner, and E. Schmutzhard. 2002. Post-infectious central and peripheral nervous system diseases complicating Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Report of three cases and review of the literature. Eur J Neurol 9:93-96.
- Footnote 13
-
Agustin, E. T., V. Gill, and B. A. Cunha. 1994. Mycoplasma pneumoniae meningoencephalitis complicated by diplopia. Heart Lung 23:436-437.
- Footnote 14
-
Arnold, S. E. 1987. Psychosis and mycoplasma pneumoniae. Hillside J Clin Psychiatry 9:231-235.
- Footnote 15
-
Wang, R. S., S. Y. Wang, K. S. Hsieh, Y. H. Chiou, I. F. Huang, M. F. Cheng, and C. C. Chiou. 2004. Necrotizing pneumonitis caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae in pediatric patients: Report of five cases and review of literature. Pediatr Infect Dis J 23:564-567.
- Footnote 16
-
Szymanski, M., M. Petric, F. E. Saunders, and R. Tellier. 2002. Mycoplasma pneumoniae pericarditis demonstrated by polymerase chain reaction and electron microscopy. Clin Infect Dis 34:E16-17.
- Footnote 17
-
Harjacek, M., J. Ostojic, and O. Djakovic Rode. 2006. Juvenile spondyloarthropathies associated with Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Clin Rheumatol 25:470-475.
- Footnote 18
-
Kashyap, S., and M. Sarkar. 2010. Mycoplasma pneumonia: Clinical features and management. Lung India 27:75-85.
- Footnote 19
-
Drew, W. L. 2004. Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma, p. 409-413. K. J. Ryan, & C. G. Ray (eds.), Sherris Medical Microbiology, 4th edition: an introduction to infectious diseases,. ASM press, Washington D.C.
- Footnote 20
-
Chen, Z. R., Y. D. Yan, Y. Q. Wang, H. Zhu, X. J. Shao, J. Xu, and W. Ji. 2013. Epidemiology of community-acquired Mycoplasma Pneumoniae respiratory tract infections among hospitalized Chinese children, including relationships with meteorological factors. Hippokratia 17:20-26.
- Footnote 21
-
Hayakawa, M., H. Taguchi, S. Kamiya, Y. Fujioka, H. Watanabe, S. Kawai, and H. Kobayashi. 2002. Animal model of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection using germfree mice. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9:669-676.
- Footnote 22
-
Dumke, R., I. Catrein, R. Herrmann, and E. Jacobs. 2004. Preference, adaptation and survival of Mycoplasma pneumoniae subtypes in an animal model. Int J Med Microbiol 294:149-155.
- Footnote 23
-
Barile, M. F., D. K. Chandler, H. Yoshida, M. W. Grabowski, R. Harasawa, and S. Razin. 1988. Parameters of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in Syrian hamsters. Infect Immun 56:2443-2449.
- Footnote 24
-
Maselli, D. J., J. L. Medina, E. G. Brooks, J. J. Coalson, T. R. Kannan, V. T. Winter, M. Principe, M. P. Cagle, J. B. Baseman, P. H. Dube, and J. I. Peters. 2018. The Immunopathologic Effects of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Community-acquired Respiratory Distress Syndrome Toxin. A Primate Model. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 58:253-260.
- Footnote 25
-
Franzoso, G., P. C. Hu, G. A. Meloni, and M. F. Barile. 1994. Immunoblot analyses of chimpanzee sera after infection and after immunization and challenge with Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Infect Immun 62:1008-1014.
- Footnote 26
-
Ursi, D., J. P. Ursi, M. Ieven, M. Docx, P. Van Reempts, and S. R. Pattyn. 1995. Congenital pneumonia due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 72:F118-120.
- Footnote 27
-
Bébéar, C., S. Pereyre, and O. Peuchant. 2011. Mycoplasma pneumoniae: susceptibility and resistance to antibiotics. Future Microbiol 6:423-431.
- Footnote 28
-
Taylor-Robinson, D., and C. Bebear. 1997. Antibiotic susceptibilities of mycoplasmas and treatment of mycoplasmal infections. J Antimicrob Chemoth 40:622.
- Footnote 29
-
Guo, D. X., W. J. Hu, R. Wei, H. Wang, B. P. Xu, W. Zhou, S. J. Ma, H. Huang, X. G. Qin, Y. Jiang, X. P. Dong, X. Y. Fu, D. W. Shi, L. Y. Wang, A. D. Shen, and D. L. Xin. 2019. Epidemiology and mechanism of drug resistance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Beijing, China: A multicenter study. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 19:288-296.
- Footnote 30
-
Eterpi, M., G. McDonnell, and V. Thomas. 2011. Decontamination efficacy against Mycoplasma. Lett Appl Microbiol 52:150-155.
- Footnote 31
-
David, S. A., D. V. Volokhov, Z. Ye, and V. Chizhikov. 2010. Evaluation of Mycoplasma inactivation during production of biologics: egg-based viral vaccines as a model. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:2718-2728.
- Footnote 32
-
Shimizu, T., Y. Kimura, Y. Kida, K. Kuwano, M. Tachibana, M. Hashino, and M. Watarai. 2014. Cytadherence of Mycoplasma pneumoniae induces inflammatory responses through autophagy and toll-like receptor 4. Infect Immun 82:3076-3086.
- Footnote 33
-
Gay, G., and N. Raymond. 2010. Gamma-Irradiation of Serum for the Inactivation of Adventitious Contaminants. PDA J Pharm Sci Tech 64:432.
- Footnote 34
-
Furness, G., F. J. Pipes, and M. J. McMurtrey. 1968. Susceptibility of Human Mycoplasmata to Ultraviolet and X Irradiations. J Infect Dis 118:1-6.
- Footnote 35
-
Waites, K. B., Y. Rikihisa, and D. Taylor-Robinson. 2003. Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma, p. 972-990. P. R. Murray, E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, J. H. Jorgensen & R. H. Yolken (Eds.), Manual of Clinical Microbiology (8th ed),. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
- Footnote 36
-
Wright, D. N., G. D. Bailey, and M. T. Hatch. 1968. Role of relative humidity in the survival of airborne Mycoplasma pneumoniae. J Bacteriol 96: 970.
- Footnote 37
-
Tsai, T.-A., C.-K. Tsai, K.-C. Kuo, and H.-R. Yu. 2021. Rational stepwise approach for Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 54:557-565.
- Footnote 38
-
Pereyre, S., J. Goret, and C. Bébéar. 2016. Mycoplasma pneumoniae: Current Knowledge on Macrolide Resistance and Treatment. Front Microbiol 7:974.
- Footnote 39
-
Nicholas, R. A. J., R. D. Ayling, and L. McAuliffe. 2009. Vaccines for Mycoplasma Diseases in Animals and Man. J Comp Pathol 140:85-96.
- Footnote 40
-
Government of Canada. 2018. ePATHogen - Risk Group Database. 2021.
- Footnote 41
-
Public Health Agency of Canada. 2019. Human Pathogens and Toxins Act (HPTA) (S.C. 2009, c.24).
Page details
- Date modified: