Evaluation of the Blood Safety Contribution Program at the Public Health Agency of Canada 2008–09 to 2013–14 – Management response and action plan

The Agency has recently posted reports on the website from the Blood Safety Contribution Program's three surveillance systems (TTISS, TESS, and CTOSS), and has committed to sharing new data collected under these systems every six months.

Management Response and Action Plan

Evaluation of the Blood Safety Contribution Program

Recommendations

Response

Action Plan

Deliverables

Expected Completion Date

Accountability

Resources

1) Develop a renewed Hemovigilance action plan which takes into consideration the current blood safety environment:

a) a risk assessment of the transfusion and transplantation surveillance environment

Agree. The Action Plan will be based on clearly defined outcomes oriented to benefits to Canadians.  These outcomes will serve as the foundation for the consultations on the Agency's role in blood safety. Complete a risk assessment for current transfusion/ transplantation Current risks for potential pathogens or other associated risks. within transfusion and transplantation are identified.

October 2014

DG and ADM Utilise resources from within CCDIC: Contract with external services to do a risk assessment and identify role of key players.

b) a clear determination of stakeholder/user needs

User needs consultation with stakeholders via National Working Group Meetings
(Mid June 2014).

Stakeholder needs and reporting are identified.
-Consultations at each working group meeting in 2014/15 (TTISS, TESS, CTOSS) to formalize reporting requirements.

September 2014

Utilise resources from within CCDIC. Face to face consultation for each Working Group (80K one time funding for June 2014)

c) role of key players in monitoring transfusion and transplantation safety and where PHAC should concentrate their effort.

Determine role of key players in transfusion/ transplantation safety through consultation with stakeholders via National Working Group Meetings
(Mid June 2014)
Identified and formalized roles of key players including update and revised ToRs to reflect current environment.

December 2014

Existing Budget: Consultations at stakeholder working group meetings
Action plan will line up with corporate surveillance activities and F/P/T priorities Formalized Transfusion and Transplantation Surveillance Action Plan. May 2015

Collaboration with Agency Surveillance Transformation group.

2) Develop and publicize service standards for the timing of the release of national-level transfusion and transplantation surveillance reporting.

Agree

Examine existing processes for receipt, validation and analysis of surveillance reporting to determine accurate timelines for release of surveillance data.

CCDIC service standards (with timelines) developed and publicized for transfusion and transplantation surveillance reporting.

July 2014

DG level

Existing budget:
Consultations will be held at next working group meetings of TTISS, TESS & CTOSS.

3) Review and clarify the goals and objectives of the National Working Groups.

Agree

Consult with NWGs to examine its existing TOR and determine the groups' relevance and areas for changes in the TOR.
Discussion at senior management level for allocation of funds.
  • CCDIC to provide revised NWG goals and objectives.
  • A revised NWG TORs

September 2014

DG Level

Utilise resources from within CCDIC: Consultations will be held at next working group meeting of TTISS, TESS & CTOSS as well as the planned face to face in item 1b) above.

Page details

Date modified: