Archived - Decision 07-004 Canada Labour Code Part II Occupational Health and Safety
Archived information
Archived information is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.
Case No.: 2005-30
Robert Cronk and UCCO-SACC-CSN
appellants
and
Correctional Services Canada
respondent
___________________________
Decision No.: CAO-07-004
February 19, 2007
This case was decided by Appeals Officer Michael McDermott.
For the Appellant
Richard Fader, Counsel, Treasury Board Legal Services
For the Respondent
Michel Bouchard, Union advisor, CSN Ontario
Health and Safety Officer
Bob Tomlin, Human Resources and Skills Development Canada
[1] This case concerns an appeal made on August 8, 2005 under the Canada Labour Code, Part II, subsection 129(7), by Robert Cronk, a Correctional Services Officer at the Collins Bay Institution, against a decision issued by Health and Safety Officer (HSO) Bob Tomlin.
[2] According to HSO Tomlin's report, on August 2, 2005, Mr. Cronk refused to work stating that:
"I was aware of information that made me believe that an inmate I was scheduled to take on a medical escort was at risk of being attacked and that would also place me at risk. I was not given the appropriate equipment to minimize that risk and I believe that it placed me in a potential situation of danger."
On completion of his investigation on August 3, 2005, HSO Tomlin determined, pursuant to subsection 129(4) of the Canada Labour Code that a danger did not exist, "beyond that which is a normal condition of employment".
[3] It is noted that an Assurance of Voluntary Compliance (AVC) was given by the employer containing two undertakings as follows:
"Ensure Correctional Officers have an effective means of quickly summoning emergency help at all times while conducting escorts outside the institution"."Review the policy of issuing personal protective equipment to officers conducting escorts outside the institution to ensure hazards and/or the risk of injury is minimized as much as possible with specific regard to the wearing of protective vests".
The AVC had a completion date of September 3, 2005.
[4] In September 2006, the parties agreed to attempt a mediated settlement to the issues in this case. I was assigned to the file and arrangements were made to hold mediation meetings in Kingston, Ontario, on February 21 and 22, 2007. On February 12, 2007, Michel Bouchard confirmed to the Canada Appeals Office that Mr. Cronk and the Union wished to withdraw the appeal, noting that satisfactory corrective measures had been adopted in workplace practices since the date of the refusal to work.
[5] Considering the written request to withdraw the appeal and having reviewed the file, I accept and declare this case closed.
_________________
Michael McDermott
Appeals Officer
Summary of Appeals Officer's Decision
Decision No.: CAO-07-004
Appellant: Robert Cronk and UCCO-SACC-CSN
Respondent: Correctional Services Canada
Key Words: Escorts outside the institution; personal protective equipment; withdrawal
Provisions: | Canada Labour Code: 129(4) and (7) |
Summary:
On August 8, 2005, Correctional Officer Robert Cronk appealed a decision of no danger issued by HSO Tomlin, arising from a refusal to undertake a medical escort outside the Collins Bay Institution. On February 12, 2007, Mr. Cronk and UCCO-CCAC-CSN withdrew their appeal of the decision. The case is therefore close.
Page details
- Date modified: