Finished product specifications form user guide
On this page
- Policy objectives
- Scope and application
- Note about user guides in general
- Guidance for implementation
- Completing the FPS form
- Recognized test methods
- Acceptable tolerance limits for quality test parameters (Tables 1, 2 and 3)
Policy objectives
This guide is intended to explain the new approach to submission of finished product specifications for product licence applications.
Scope and application
This guide applies to the submission of all pre-market submissions of natural health products that fall under the Natural Health Products Regulations (regulations). This document should be read along with the following guidance document:
Note about user guides in general
User guides are meant to provide assistance to industry and health care professionals on how to comply with governing statutes and regulations. They also provide guidance to Health Canada on how mandates and objectives should be implemented fairly, consistently and effectively.
User guides are administrative, not legal, instruments. This means that flexibility can be applied. However, to be acceptable, alternate approaches to the principles and practices described in this document must be supported by adequate scientific justification. They should be discussed in advance with the relevant program area to avoid the possible finding that applicable statutory or regulatory requirements have not been met.
As always, Health Canada reserves the right to request information or material, or define conditions not specifically described in this guide, to help us adequately assess the safety, efficacy or quality of a natural health product. We are committed to ensuring that such requests are justifiable and that decisions are clearly documented.
This document should be read along with the relevant sections of other applicable guides or guidance documents.
Guidance for implementation
The Natural and Non-Prescription Health Products Directorate (NNHPD) has developed a new approach to the assessment of the evidence for quality of finished natural health products (NHPs) that will expedite the pre-market authorization process. This new quality assessment process is intended to ensure that specifications meet with acceptable standards. The following document consists of a finished product specifications (FPS) template and Tables 1, 2 and 3, which outline prescribed tolerance limits for each type of test required for NHPs. Test methods recognized by the NNHPD are now also available via the Controlled Vocabulary search in the Natural Health Products Ingredients Database (NHPID).
By submitting the finished product specifications information in this form, the applicant is meeting the requirements of section 5(i) of the Natural Health Products Regulations.
The testing requirements listed in the template, the limits in Tables 1 to 3 and test methods found in the NHPID are consistent with the following guidance document:
The responsibility to maintain complete quality information, including full test records, remains in place, and documentation must be provided to Health Canada on request. Auditing of documentation may occur during post-market and site-licensing evaluations.
Completing the FPS form
Note: macros must be enabled in Microsoft Word in order to check the boxes on the form. If the boxes cannot be checked, a security alert should be present in yellow below the toolbar. Click on “enable content” box to enable the feature.
Brand name
The brand name must be indicated on the FPS and must match the brand name indicated on the product licence application (PLA) form.
Sections A and B
Sections A and B are intended to provide descriptive information about the product. The type of dosage form must be specified in section A, and the types of ingredients contained in the product must be identified in section B.
This information is required as it serves to assist both the applicant and the NNHPD Assessment Officer in determining what evidence will be required to support the quality of the product. For example:
- If an NHP contains both a plant and an isolate, then the applicant is able to attest that microbial contamination limits meet those that pertain to the plant material (the less stringent of the 2).
- If the product type does not include plants, extracts, homeopathic medicines or traditional medicines, the Assessment Officer is immediately aware that pesticides testing may not be required.
Section C
This section covers the following:
- medicinal ingredients and/or standardized constituents
- their quantities
- quantity tolerance limits
- test methods
- identity testing
The quantity and potency (if applicable) of each medicinal ingredient must be included along with its tolerance limits. Three options are provided for quantification of the medicinal ingredient:
- quantification by input
- a finished product assay by a method found in the NHPID or an equivalent validated in-house method
- an assay by a test method recorded in section E
Note that when an ingredient is not assayed at the finished product stage (for instance, the addition is verified by GMP and in-process controls), a rationale is required to justify the absence of analytical testing. It should be clear whether testing of constituents (potency) for the purpose of standardization is done at the finished product or raw material stage (or both stages) and the test method used should be either one found in the NHPID or else specified in section E of the form.
For identity testing, it must be indicated for each medicinal ingredient whether the test methods is one found in the NHPID or an equivalent validated in-house method, whether the tolerance limits meet the requirements laid out in Table 1 and whether testing occurs at the finished product or raw material stage.
Note: If additional rows are required at any time, move your cursor to the outside right of the table (beside the last row) and press enter. A new row should appear. Alternatively, you may attach separate sheets of the same form if necessary.
Section D
Section D confirms that the product is tested in accordance with the following guidance document:
This section of the guidance document and is subdivided into 3 sections:
- relates to general parameters which apply to all NHPs
- relates to ingredient-specific testing parameters for both medicinal and non-medicinal ingredients and
- relates to performance standards for specific dosage forms
The NNHPD’s prescribed limits for the parameters in subsections 1, 2 and 3 are laid out in Tables 1, 2 and 3, respectively. For each applicable test parameter, it must be indicated whether the test methods meet those set out in NHPID or an equivalent validated in house method, whether the tolerance limits meet the requirements laid out in Tables 1, 2 and 3, and whether testing occurs at the finished product or raw material stage. This can be done by checking the appropriate boxes under each column (for instance, check the box marked “yes” if limits meet the requirements or “no” if they do not meet the requirements and provide the limits in section F). If the product does not contain the specific ingredient, indicate so by checking the box under ‘Product does not contain this ingredient’. If testing is not required (for example, microbial testing in products containing >50% alcohol), indicate so by checking the box under ‘N/A’ and provide a rationale. In the list of ingredient-specific parameters in section D(2), there is space at the end of the list to declare any additional specific tests performed that are not identified in section 2. Note that the test methods and tolerance limits must be included.
Note that the absence of a check does not equate to ‘N/A’.
Section E
When it is indicated that a test method used is not on the list of test methods found in the NHPID for a specific test parameter in sections C and D, then the test method used must be listed in section E. A rationale must be provided briefly describing the test method and justifying the use of this method.
Section F
When it is indicated that the tolerance limits for the test parameter do not meet the NNHPD’s prescribed limits for the parameters outlined in section D and the relevant tables, the alternative tolerance limits are to be listed in section F. A rationale must be provided justifying the limits and the expected risk to the consumer which arises from not meeting NNHPD limits.
Section G
Rationales must be scientific, backed by appropriate data and sufficiently justify why the proposed testing will not result in a risk to the consumer. Applicants can refer to the Quality of Natural Health Products Guide for more information on acceptable rationales:
If a rationale is required by checking ‘N/A’ for any test parameter, it must be indicated in this section. Absence of a rationale will result in an incomplete FPS.
Signature block
Finally, the FPS is to be signed by a Quality Assurance signatory or designated official, confirming that all records relating to the evidence for quality of the NHP are in compliance with the FPS provided.
Recognized test methods
The NNHPD has provided a list of test methods in the NHPID. Each of these test methods is suitable for use for a particular product, either as published or modified for use for specific products. However, no test methods are appropriate for all products. By selecting 1 of these test methods from the list for a test parameter, you are indicating that:
- you are using this test method or an equivalent validated in-house method for assay or other determination of the test parameter and
- the test method is suitable for use for your product or raw material
It is the responsibility of the applicant to determine which test methods are appropriate for the product submitted for licensing. This is not an extensive list of methods, and thus test methods for specific products may not be present on the list. Alternate test methods may be listed in section F of the finished product specifications form.
The list of test methods found in the NHPID is not a complete list. It is part of a dynamic and growing database. As such, if it is felt that a test method used for a given test parameter is widely used in industry but it is not contained in the list, then relevant feedback (including details such as test type, protocols, validation information) should be forwarded to NNHPD. Use the natural health products ingredient database issue form to indicate this test method should be considered for addition to the NHPID.
To find the test methods listed in the Natural Health Products Ingredients Database, select “Test Methods” in the Category field using the Controlled Vocabulary Search function. You can enter specific search criteria in the Search field. You can also leave the Search field blank. A complete list of test methods recognized by NNHPD will appear.
Acceptable tolerance limits for quality test parameters (Tables 1, 2 and 3)
Test parameters | Product/ingredient | Tolerance limits | |
---|---|---|---|
Physical Identity (physical description of the finished product) |
For all products (finished product stage) |
Conforms to standard |
|
Identity of Medicinal Ingredients |
For all ingredients |
Conforms to reference material |
|
Live microorganisms (for example, probiotics) |
PhenotypingFootnote 1: Conforms to reference material and genotypingFootnote 2:
Whole genome in-vitro sampling/ sequencing through a method that is adequate for the species, to allow independent confirmation (for example, RAPD-PCR, PFGE, ERIC-PCR, rep-PCR) |
||
Quantity |
Most ingredients |
Pharmacopoeial limits or, in their absence, 80% to 120% of the label |
|
Enzymes |
80% to 150% of label claim |
||
Vitamins, minerals |
Pharmacopoeial limits or, in their absence, 80% to 120% of label claim |
||
Live microorganisms (for example, probiotics) |
At least 80% of the label claim at the end of shelf life Upper limits for total colony-forming units (CFU) should be established according to GMPs using internationally recognized methods. |
||
Lutein |
90% to 130% of label claim |
||
Potency (for standardized extracts) |
Most constituents |
Pharmacopoeial limits or 80% to 120% of the label claim |
|
Enzymes (if quantity was declared by weight) |
80% to 150% of label claim |
||
Vitamins, minerals |
Pharmacopoeial limits or, in their absence, 80% to 120% of label claim |
||
Lutein |
90% to 130% of label claim |
||
Zeaxanthin |
90% to 260% of label claim |
||
Purity – microbial |
Microbial contaminants |
Most products |
USP, BP or Eur. Pharm. LimitsFootnote 3 |
P. aeruginosa (liquids with <50% alcohol) |
Non-probiotic liquid products |
USP, BP or Eur. Pharm. LimitsFootnote 3 |
|
Products containing live microorganisms (liquid preparations only) |
Absent (not detected in 1 g or 1 ml) |
||
Total aerobic plate countFootnote 4 |
Products containing live microorganisms/probiotics |
104 CFU/g or mL |
|
Total yeast and mould countFootnote 5 |
Products containing live microorganisms/probiotics |
102 CFU/g or mL |
|
Salmonella spp. |
Products containing live microorganisms/probiotics |
Absent (10 g or 10 mL) |
|
Escherichia coli |
Products containing live microorganisms/probiotics |
Absent (10 g or 10 mL) |
|
Staphylococcus aureus |
Products containing live microorganisms/probiotics |
Absent (1 g or 1 mL) |
|
Enterobacteriaceae and bile tolerant gram-negative bacteriaFootnote 6 |
Products containing live microorganisms/probiotics |
102 CFU/g or mL |
|
Other microbial impurity testing |
As required by USP, BP or EU. Pharm. |
USP, BP or EU. Pharm. limitsFootnote 3 |
|
Purity – chemical |
Total arsenic |
All products (except topical) |
< 0.14 µg/kg b.w./day |
Topical |
3 ppm |
||
Organic arsenic |
Only if total arsenic limit is exceeded |
< 20 μg/kg b.w./day |
|
Inorganic arsenic |
Only if total arsenic limit is exceeded |
< 0.03 μg/kg b.w./day |
|
Cadmium |
All products (except topical) |
< 0.09 µg/kg b.w./day |
|
Topical |
3 ppm |
||
Lead |
All products (except topical) |
< 0.14 µg/kg b.w./day |
|
Topical |
10 ppm |
||
Total mercury |
All products (except topical) |
< 0.29 µg/kg b.w./day |
|
Topical |
1 ppm |
||
MethylmercuryFootnote 7 |
Only if total mercury limit exceeds limit for methylmercury |
< 0.029 µg/kg b.w./day |
|
Chromium VI (if applicable) |
All products (except topical) |
< 0.29 µg/ kg b.w./day |
|
Topical |
5 ppm |
||
Antimony (if applicable) |
Topical |
5 ppm |
|
Solvent residues |
Extracts, isolates, synthetic duplicates |
ICH Q3C or pharmacopoeial limits |
|
Stability |
Stability: Enumeration testing required for probiotics and activity testing required for enzymes |
For all products |
Meets the requirements set out in the Good manufacturing practices guidance document Meets the requirements in specifications at the end of shelf life for purity, quantity, potency and physical characteristics |
|
Ingredient | Test parameter | Tolerance limit |
---|---|---|
Products containing plants, plant material, fungi, algae, cyanobacteria, non-human animal material or their extracts |
Pesticides |
Pharmacopoeial or World Health Organization limits |
Ginseng, nuts and other suspected plants, plant material and extracts |
Mycotoxins (for example, aflatoxins) |
Aflatoxins < 20 µg/kg (ppb) of substance |
Cyanobacterial materials (blue-green algae, including Aphanizomenon flos-aquae) |
Cyanobacterial toxins |
0.02 µg MC-LR/kg b.w./day |
Products containing extracts, isolates, synthetic duplicates |
Related impurities Product and/or process related impurities, if applicable (for example, co- extracted substances, inactive isomers, degradation product, intermediate product, reagents, catalysts) |
Pharmacopoeial limits |
Marine oils (for example, cod liver oil, fish oil, krill oil, seal oil, squid oil) |
Sum of PCDFs, PCDDs and dioxin-like PCBs |
10.0 pg TEQ TEF/g of oil |
Sum of PCDFs and PCDDs |
2.0 pg TEQ TEF/g of oil |
|
Peroxide value (PV) |
Max. 5 mEq/kg |
|
p-Anisidine Value (AV) |
Max. 20 mEq/kg |
|
TOTOX value |
Max. 26 mEq/kg |
|
Oils containing non-marine unsaturated fatty acids |
Oxidative stability: Peroxide value (PV) and/or Anisidine value (AV) as per pharmacopeial monographs |
Pharmacopoeial limits |
Bee products (for example, royal jelly and honey) |
Antibiotic residues |
Absent |
Horsetail (Equisetum arvense L.) |
Thiaminase activity (horsetail) |
Free of thiaminase activity |
Products that may have been in contact with radioactivity |
Radioactivity (when suspected) |
600 Becquerels/kg of substance |
Glycerin (products containing glycerin, not including glycerin in capsules) |
Diethylene glycol and related compounds |
0.1% of any individual impurity, not more than 1.0% of total impurities |
Products containing creatine monohydrate |
Dicyandiamide |
< 50 ppm |
Dihydrotriazines |
Not detected (detection limit of < 5 ppm) |
|
Creatinine |
< 100 ppm |
|
Animal materials (for example, ovaries, hypothalamus, prostate gland, mammary gland, pituitary gland, adrenal gland and oxchic gland) |
Hormones (sex hormones that are regulated as prescription drugs under the Food and Drug Regulations or as controlled substances as set out in Schedule IV of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act) |
Absent |
Nosodes (for homeopathic products containing nosodes) |
Sterility technique in compliance with the sterility requirements in the HPUS or HAB |
Complies with sterility requirements in the HPUS or HAB |
Ingredient-specific |
Impurities (specify impurity) |
Pharmacopoeial limits if available |
Potential adulterants (specify adulterant) |
Pharmacopoeial limits if available |
|
Other (specify) |
Pharmacopoeial limits if available |
|
Live microorganisms/ probiotics |
Antibiotic/antifungal resistance: broth microdilution or other equivalent non-clinical method |
Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) below species limits, as published by an internationally recognized panel (for example, EFSA) Broth microdilution or other equivalent non-clinical method |
Virulence factor production:Footnote 1 PCR/southern blot comparison with a closely related virulent strain (positive control) |
Absence of the genetic elements responsible for the production of virulence factors characteristic to the species |
|
Toxigenic activity:Footnote 1 Confirmatory published in-vitro method adequate for the species or other internationally recognized methods |
Absence of toxin production known to the species (for example, enteric, emetic) |
|
|
Product | Test parameter | Tolerance limit | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
Discrete dosage forms |
Weight variation or uniformity of dosage unit |
Conforms to pharmacopoeial limits |
For example, capsule, tablet, lozenge |
Disintegration or dissolution |
Uncoated |
NMT 45 min |
N/A |
Plain coated |
NMT 60 min |
N/A |
|
Enteric-coated |
NLT 60 min in gastric fluid NMT 60 min in simulated intestinal fluid |
Enteric-coated tablets to be tested in accordance with the U.S. or European pharmacopoeias (USP or Ph.Eur.) |
|
Dissolution |
Controlled release |
2-stage or multi-point testing depending on type of controlled release (refer to “delayed and extended release”) |
N/A |
Delayed release |
2-stage testing required |
N/A |
|
Extended release |
Multiple-point sampling should be performed |
N/A |
|
Products containing preservatives |
Antimicrobial EffectivenessFootnote 1 |
Meets pharmacopoeial requirements |
For example, potassium sorbate, sodium benzoate |
Other dosage forms (for example, transdermal patches, metered dosage forms) |
Please specify |
Meets pharmacopoeial requirements when available |
N/A |
|
Page details
- Date modified: