Air pollutant emission performance for the 2019 model year on-road vehicle fleet
In relation to the On-Road Vehicle and Engine Emission Regulations under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999
Transportation Division
The information contained in this report is compiled from data reported to Environment and Climate Change Canada pursuant to the On-Road Vehicle and Engine Emission Regulations under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. Information presented in this report is subject to ongoing verification.
Cat. No.: En81-31E-PDF
ISSN: EN 1927-2456
EC21187
Unless otherwise specified, you may not reproduce materials in this publication, in whole or in part, for the purposes of commercial redistribution without prior written permission from Environment and Climate Change Canada's copyright administrator. To obtain permission to reproduce Government of Canada materials for commercial purposes, apply for Crown Copyright Clearance by contacting:
Environment and Climate Change Canada
Public Inquiries Centre
12th Floor Fontaine Building
200 Sacré-Coeur Blvd
Gatineau QC K1A 0H3
Telephone: 819-997-2800
Toll Free: 1-800-668-6767 (in Canada only)
Email: ec.enviroinfo.ec@canada.ca
Photos: © Environment and Climate Change Canada
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Environment and Climate Change, 2021
Aussi disponible en français.
On this page
- List of Figures
- List of Tables
- Executive summary
- 1. Purpose
- 2. The Regulations
- 3. Tier 3 reporting for the 2019 MY
- 3.1 Fleet average NMOG+NOx emission performance
- 3.1.1 Light-duty vehicles and light-duty trucks 1, 120k
- 3.1.2 Light-duty vehicles and light-duty trucks 1, 150k
- 3.1.3 Light-duty trucks 2, heavy light-duty trucks, and medium-duty passenger vehicles
- 3.1.4 Class 2B vehicles
- 3.1.5 Class 3 vehicles
- 3.1.6 NMOG+NOx averaging sets
- 3.1.7 Early action credits
- 3.1.8 Overall performance of Canadian fleets
- 3.2 Fleet average cold NMHC emission performance
- 3.3 Fleet average EVAP emission performance
- 3.4 PM and EVAP phase-in performance
- 3.1 Fleet average NMOG+NOx emission performance
- 4. Conclusions
List of figures
- Figure 1: NOx fleet averages and standards for MYs 2004 through 2016
- Figure 2: NMOG+NOx fleet averages and standards for the light-duty vehicle and light-duty truck 1 fleet and the light-duty truck 2, heavy light-duty trucks and medium-duty passenger vehicles fleet
- Figure 3: NMOG+NOx fleet averages and standards for the Class 2B fleet and the Class 3 fleet
List of tables
- Table 1: light-duty vehicle, light light-duty truck, heavy light-duty truck and medium-duty passenger vehicle Tier 3 federal test procedure bin exhaust emission standards (grams/mile)
- Table 2: Class 2B vehicle Tier 3 FTP bin exhaust emission standards (grams/mile)
- Table 3: Class 3 vehicle Tier 3 FTP bin exhaust emission standards (grams/mile)
- Table 4: scope of company reports (Tier 3)
- Table 5: distribution of Tier 3 vehicles by NMOG+NOx standard of each bin
- Table 6: declining fleet average Tier 3 FTP emission standards for NMOG+NOx (grams/mile)
- Table 7: declining fleet average Tier 3 SFTP emission standards for NMOG+NOx (grams/mile)
- Table 8: declining fleet average FTP emission standards for NMOG+NOx (grams/mile)
- Table 9: summary of company average NMOG+NOx FTP values for the light-duty vehicle and light-duty truck 1, 120K fleet
- Table 10: summary of company average NMOG+NOx SFTP values for the light-duty vehicle and light-duty truck 1, 120K fleet
- Table 11: summary of company average NMOG+NOx FTP values for the light-duty vehicle and light-duty truck 1, 150K fleet
- Table 12: summary of company average NMOG+NOx SFTP values for the light-duty vehicle and light-duty truck 1, 150K fleet
- Table 13: summary of company average NMOG+NOx FTP values for the light duty truck 2, heavy light-duty truck, and medium-duty passenger vehicle, 150K fleet
- Table 14: summary of company average NMOG+NOx SFTP values for the light duty truck 2, heavy light-duty truck, and medium-duty passenger vehicle, 150K fleet
- Table 15: summary of company average NMOG+NOx FTP values for the Class 2B vehicle fleet
- Table 16: summary of company average NMOG+NOx FTP values for the Class 3 vehicle fleet
- Table 17: fleet average cold temperature NMHC exhaust emission standards
- Table 18: summary of company average cold NMHC values for the light-duty vehicle and light light-duty truck fleet
- Table 19: summary of company average cold NMHC values for the heavy light-duty truck and medium duty passenger vehicle fleet
- Table 20: Tier 3 diurnal plus hot soak emission standards in grams per test
- Table 21: summary of company average EVAP values for the light-duty vehicle and light duty truck 1 fleet
- Table 22: summary of company average EVAP values for the light-duty truck 2 fleet
- Table 23: summary of company average EVAP values for the heavy light-duty truck and medium-duty passenger vehicle fleet
- Table 24: summary of company average EVAP values for the Class 2B and Class 3 vehicle fleet
Executive summary
The On-Road Vehicle and Engine Emission Regulations (hereinafter referred to as the “Regulations”) establish national emission standards to limit smog-forming emissions (non-methane organic gases (NMOG), nitrous oxides (NOx), particulate matter (PM), cold non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC), evaporative emissions (EVAP)) from new on-road vehicles and engines. The Tier 3 fleet average standards continue to align with the progressively more stringent standards adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) over the 2017 through 2025 model years (MYs). These Regulations require importers and manufacturers of new vehicles to meet fleet average emission standards for air pollutants and establish annual compliance reporting requirements. The 2017 MY, is the first MY in which companies are required to meet the new Tier 3 standards.
This report summarizes the fleet average air pollutant emission performance of the Canadian 2019 MY fleet of vehicles. A total of 23 companies submitted end of MY reports comprising a total of 1 972 856 vehicles manufactured in Canada or imported into Canada for the purpose of first retail sale. This report includes the fleet average NMOG+NOx, cold NMHC and EVAP values for each company as well as their number of emission credits or deficits. It also provides a comparison of the distribution of vehicles certified to the various emission bins and compares the overall NMOG+NOx performance with that of the pre-Tier 3 MYs.
The average NMOG+NOx value for the Canadian 2019 MY combined fleet of light-duty vehicles and light-duty trucks 1 is 0.06664580 grams/mile compared to the standards of 0.072 grams/mile. The average NMOG+NOx value for the Canadian 2019 MY combined fleet of light-duty trucks 2, heavy-light duty trucks and medium-duty passenger vehicles is 0.07528215 grams/mile compared to the standard of 0.083 grams/mile. The average NMOG+NOx value for the Canadian 2019 MY fleet of Class 2B vehicles is 0.24332 grams/mile compared to the standard of 0.253 grams/mile. The average NMOG+NOx value for the Canadian 2019 MY fleet of Class 3 vehicles is 0.44316 grams/mile compared to the standard of 0.400 grams/mile.
The overall NMOG+NOx fleet averages demonstrate continued industry improvements in emission performance since 2004. While the fleet average value for the Class 3 fleet is above the applicable standards for the 2019 MY, companies have 3 years to offset any deficits incurred, and all currently remain in compliance with the fleet averaging provisions of the Regulations. All companies have complied with the 2019 PM and EVAP phase-in percentages and have met the cold NMHC fleet average standards.
1. Purpose
The purpose of this report is to summarize the fleet average air pollutant emission performance of individual companies and the overall Canadian fleet for the 2019 MY. It is based on data submitted by companies in their end of MY reports and any subsequent revisions received prior to the publication of this report. It also serves to report on the effectiveness of the Canadian fleet average air pollutant emission program in achieving the environmental performance objectives outlined in the Regulations.
2. The Regulations
On January 1, 2004, the On-Road Vehicle and Engine Emission Regulations came into effect under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA). These Regulations introduced more stringent national emission standards for on-road vehicles and engines. The Regulations align Canada’s emission standards for light-duty vehiclesFootnote 1 (LDVs), light light-duty trucksFootnote 2 (LLDTs) composed of Light-Duty Trucks 1 (LDT1) and Light-Duty Trucks 2 (LDT2), heavy light-duty trucksFootnote 3 (HLDTs) composed of Light-Duty Trucks 3 (LDT3) and Light-Duty Trucks 4 (LDT4), medium-duty passenger vehiclesFootnote 4 (MDPVs), heavy-duty vehicles, heavy-duty engines and on-road motorcycles with those of the U.S. EPA through incorporation by reference to the U.S. CFR.
From MY 2004 through MY 2016, companies were required to meet fleet average NOx emission standards (Tier 1 and Tier 2 standards). Figure 1 shows the overall Canadian performance during those years.
Figure 1: NOx fleet averages and standards for MYs 2004 through 2016
Long description for figure 1
Figure 1 is a graph presenting the average NOx values trend relative to the standard since 2004 for both the light-duty vehicle/light light-duty truck and heavy light-duty truck/medium-duty passenger vehicle fleets. Overall, the fleet average NOx value for the combined fleet of light-duty vehicles, light light-duty trucks, heavy light-duty trucks and medium-duty passenger vehicles has remained below the applicable standard from 2004 to 2016. It should be noted that the fleet average NOx values for the 2009 to 2016 MYs are shown as single points since light light-duty trucks, heavy light-duty trucks and medium-duty passenger vehicles were subject to the same standard as light-duty vehicles.
The Regulations were subsequently amended in 2015 to set new emission standards (Tier 3) for passenger cars, light-duty trucks and certain heavy-duty vehicles for 2017 and later MYs that are imported or manufactured in Canada. The amendments establish progressively more stringent vehicles and fleet average standards over the MYs 2017 to 2025 for combined emissions of NMOG and NOx and establish a phase-in schedule for more stringent PM and evaporative emission standards, in alignment with the U.S. EPA standards adopted in 2014.
A company’s fleet of light-duty vehicles, light-duty trucks and medium-duty passenger vehicles will have to comply with progressively more stringent exhaust emission standards, reaching a fleet average standard for emission of NMOG+NOx of 30 milligrams per mile as of MY 2025. Similarly, heavy-duty vehicle weight classes 2BFootnote 5 and 3Footnote 6 will be required to comply with progressively more stringent fleet average standards for emissions of NMOG+NOx, reaching fleet average standards of 178 milligrams/mile and 247 milligrams/mile, respectively, as of MY 2022.
Also, as of MY 2017, new PM exhaust emission standards are introduced by means of a phase-in approach through which an increasing percentage of vehicles in a company’s fleet for each successive MY will be required to comply with the standards, with full implementation starting with MY 2021. An alternative phase-in compliance approach for these standards allows companies to conform to the standards by demonstrating that an equivalent number of vehicles conform to the new standards, when averaged over more than 1 MY included in the phase-in period. For vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) up to 6000 lb, the PM standard is 3 milligrams/mile. For vehicles with a GVWR above 6 000 lb and up to 14 000 lb, this standard is 3 milligrams/mile for the applicable light-duty trucks and MDPVs, and 8 milligrams/mile and 10 milligrams/mile for heavy-duty vehicle weight classes 2B and 3, respectively.
As of MY 2017, new EVAP standards are introduced by means of a phase-in approach through which an increasing percentage of a company’s fleet of vehicles for each successive MY will be required to comply with the standards, with full implementation starting with MY 2022. An alternative phase-in compliance approach for these standards allows companies to conform to the standards by demonstrating that an equivalent number of vehicles conform to the new standards, when averaged over more than 1 MY included in the phase-in period. For LDV and LDT1 vehicles, this standard is 0.3 grams per test. For LDT2 vehicles, this standard is 0.4 grams per test. For HLDTs, this standard is 0.5 grams per test and for heavy-duty vehicles (Class 2B and 3), this standard is 0.6 grams per test.
The amendments also introduce new fleet average standards in Canada for cold temperature exhaust emissions of NMHCs. For fleets consisting of vehicles with a GVWR up to 6000 lb, the cold temperature NMHC fleet average standard is fixed at 0.3 grams/mile, starting with the 2017 MY. For fleets consisting of vehicles with a GVWR above 6 000 lb and up to 10 000 lb, the cold temperate NMHC fleet average standard is fixed at 0.5 grams/mile, starting with the 2017 MY.
Flexibilities for vehicles sold concurrently in Canada and the United States are included for compliance with the fleet average emission standards as well as the phase-in emission standards. These flexibilities recognize that the emission performance of a company’s fleet of vehicle models that are sold concurrently in the United States is effectively anchored by the U.S. regulatory program.
The Regulations require that all companies submit a compliance report to the Minister no later than May 1 after the end of each MY. The end of MY report must contain detailed information concerning the company’s fleet(s) and/or groups of vehicles.
For more information regarding the Regulations, or more specifically, the calculation of fleet average values and emission credits or deficits, please refer to the Regulations, which can be found on the Environment and Climate Change Canada CEPA Environmental Registry.
3. Tier 3 reporting for the 2019 MY
Under the Tier 3 standards, companies certify a vehicle to a combined "NMOG+NOx" bin. These bins represent the Federal Test Procedure (FTP) standards that vehicles are certified against. For the 2019 MY, a company’s fleet average NMOG+NOx FTP values are calculated over the following fleets:
- a company’s fleet that is composed of all of its light-duty vehicles and light-duty trucks 1 to which the applicable NMOG+NOx standard applies for a useful life of 120 000 miles
- a company’s fleet that is composed of all of its light-duty vehicles and light-duty trucks 1 to which the applicable NMOG+NOx standard applies for a useful life of 150 000 miles
- a company’s fleet that is composed of all of its light-duty trucks 2, heavy light-duty trucks and medium-duty passenger vehicles
- a company’s fleet that is composed of all of its Class 2B vehicles
- a company’s fleet that is composed of all of its Class 3 vehicles
Table 1, table 2 and table 3 presents the corresponding exhaust emission standards for the Tier 3 FTP bins.
Bin number | NMOG+NOx | CO | Formaldehyde | PM |
---|---|---|---|---|
160 | 0.160 | 4.2 | 0.004 | 0.003 |
125 | 0.125 | 2.1 | 0.004 | 0.003 |
110a | 0.110 | 2.1 | 0.004 | 0.003 |
85a | 0.085 | 2.1 | 0.004 | 0.003 |
70 | 0.070 | 1.7 | 0.004 | 0.003 |
50 | 0.050 | 1.7 | 0.004 | 0.003 |
30 | 0.030 | 1.0 | 0.004 | 0.003 |
20 | 0.020 | 1.0 | 0.004 | 0.003 |
0 | 0.000 | 0.0 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
a Transitional bins to which vehicles may be certified to through MY 2019.
Bin number | NMOG+NOx | CO |
---|---|---|
395a | 0.395 | 6.4 |
340a | 0.340 | 6.4 |
250 | 0.250 | 6.4 |
200 | 0.200 | 4.2 |
170 | 0.170 | 4.2 |
150 | 0.150 | 3.2 |
0 | 0.000 | 0.0 |
a Transitional bins to which vehicles may be certified to through MY 2021.
Bin number | NMOG+NOx | CO |
---|---|---|
630a | 0.630 | 7.3 |
570a | 0.570 | 7.3 |
400 | 0.400 | 7.3 |
270 | 0.270 | 4.2 |
230 | 0.230 | 4.2 |
200 | 0.200 | 3.7 |
0 | 0.000 | 0.0 |
a Transitional bins to which vehicles may be certified to through MY 2021.
Table 4 presents the companies that submitted an end of MY report which contained vehicles that were certified to Tier 3 standards, including the vehicle makes and the number of Tier 3 certified test groups.
Company | Makes | Number of test groups |
---|---|---|
Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd. | Aston Martin | 3 |
BMW Group Canada | BMW, Mini, Rolls-Royce | 24 |
FCA Canada Inc. | Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep, Fiat, Alfa Romeo, RAM | 39 |
Ferrari North America, Inc. | Ferrari | 2 |
Ford Motor Company of Canada, Ltd. | Ford, Lincoln | 56 |
General Motors of Canada Company | Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet, GMC | 47 |
Honda Canada Inc. | Acura, Honda | 29 |
Hyundai Auto Canada Corp. | Hyundai | 31 |
Jaguar Land Rover Canada, ULC | Jaguar, Land Rover | 11 |
Kia Canada Inc. | Kia | 21 |
Maserati North America, Inc. | Maserati | 5 |
Mazda Canada Inc. | Mazda | 10 |
McLaren Automotive Ltd. | McLaren | 2 |
Mercedes-Benz Canada Inc. | Mercedes, Smart | 29 |
Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Canada | Mitsubishi | 7 |
Nissan Canada Inc. | Infiniti, Nissan | 29 |
Porsche Cars Canada, Ltd. | Porsche | 11 |
Roush Performance | Ford | 1 |
Subaru Canada, Inc. | Subaru | 7 |
Tesla Motors Canada Inc. | Tesla | 4 |
Toyota Canada Inc. | Lexus, Scion, Toyota | 37 |
Volkswagen Group Canada | Audi, Bentley, Bugatti, Lamborghini, Volkswagen | 22 |
Volvo Cars of Canada Corp. | Volvo | 4 |
Table 5 summarizes the distribution of vehicles by the NMOG+NOx standard for each bin.
Tier and bin number | NMOG+NOx standard (grams/mile) |
Total number of vehicles in “bin” | Percentage of vehicles in “bin” |
---|---|---|---|
Tier 3 Bin 630 | 0.630 | 0 | 0.00 |
Tier 3 Bin 570 | 0.570 | 21 021 | 1.07 |
Tier 3 Bin 400 | 0.400 | 10 841 | 0.55 |
Tier 3 Bin 395 | 0.395 | 1 | 0.00 |
Tier 3 Bin 340 | 0.340 | 15 067 | 0.76 |
Tier 3 Bin 270 | 0.270 | 11 074 | 0.56 |
Tier 3 Bin 250 | 0.250 | 26 871 | 1.36 |
Tier 3 Bin 230 | 0.230 | 1 318 | 0.07 |
Tier 3 Bin 200 | 0.200 | 25 413 | 1.29 |
Tier 3 Bin 170 | 0.170 | 1 724 | 0.09 |
Tier 3 Bin 160 | 0.160 | 21 347 | 1.08 |
Tier 3 Bin 150 | 0.150 | 4 386 | 0.22 |
Tier 3 Bin 125 | 0.125 | 404 441 | 20.50 |
Tier 3 Bin 110a | 0.110 | 115 323 | 5.85 |
Tier 3 Bin 85a | 0.085 | 3 455 | 0.18 |
Tier 3 Bin 70 | 0.070 | 784 492 | 39.76 |
Tier 3 Bin 50 | 0.050 | 171 108 | 8.67 |
Tier 3 Bin 30 | 0.030 | 322 432 | 16.34 |
Tier 3 Bin 20 | 0.020 | 910 | 0.05 |
Tier 3 Bin 0 | 0.000 | 31 632 | 1.60 |
Total number of Tier 3 vehicles in 2019 MY fleet is 1 972 856.
a Transitional bins.
3.1 Fleet average NMOG+NOx emission performance
This section describes the manufacturers NMOG+NOx fleet average performance.
Table 6 and table 7, both taken from section 86.1811-17 of the CFR, present the declining fleet average Tier 3 FTP and Supplemental Federal Test Procedure (SFTP) emission standards for NMOG+NOx for light-duty vehicles, light-duty trucks, heavy-light duty trucks and medium-duty passenger vehicles from MY 2017 to MY 2025.
MY | LDV, LDT1 - 150 000 mile useful lifea | LDV, LDT1 - 120 000 mile useful lifea | LDT2, HLDTb |
---|---|---|---|
2017c | 0.086 | 0.073 | 0.101 |
2018 | 0.079 | 0.067 | 0.092 |
2019 | 0.072 | 0.061 | 0.083 |
2020 | 0.065 | 0.055 | 0.074 |
2021 | 0.058 | 0.049 | 0.065 |
2022 | 0.051 | 0.043 | 0.056 |
2023 | 0.044 | 0.037 | 0.047 |
2024 | 0.037 | 0.031 | 0.038 |
2025 | 0.030 | 0.026 | 0.030 |
a Vehicles certified to standards based on a useful life of 120 000 miles may comply based on the fleet-average standard specified for 150 000 mile useful life in certain circumstances as specified in paragraph (b)(8)(iii)(A) of this section.
b MDPVs are subject to all the same emission standards and certification provisions that apply to LDT4.
c HLDT and MDPV must meet the Tier 3 standards starting with MY 2018.
MY | NMOG+NOx (grams/mile) |
---|---|
2017a | 0.103 |
2018 | 0.097 |
2019 | 0.090 |
2020 | 0.083 |
2021 | 0.077 |
2022 | 0.070 |
2023 | 0.063 |
2024 | 0.057 |
2025 | 0.050 |
a HLDT and MDPV must meet the Tier 3 standards starting with MY 2018.
Table 8, taken from section 86.1818-18 of the CFR, presents the declining fleet average Tier 3 FTP emission standards for NMOG+NOx for Class 2B and Class 3 vehicles from MY 2018 to MY 2022.
MY | Class 2B | Class 3 |
---|---|---|
2016a | 0.333 | 0.548 |
2017a | 0.310 | 0.508 |
2018 | 0.278 | 0.451 |
2019 | 0.253 | 0.400 |
2020 | 0.228 | 0.349 |
2021 | 0.203 | 0.298 |
2022 | 0.178 | 0.247 |
a Fleet-average standards are shown for 2016 and 2017 for purposes of voluntary early compliance.
3.1.1. Light-duty vehicles and light-duty trucks 1, 120k
Table 9 presents the summary of the company average NMOG+NOx FTP values for their LDV/LDT1 120k fleets.
Company | Total number of vehicles in fleet | Fleet average NMOG+NOx value (grams/mile) |
Total 2019 MY credits | Credit balance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd. | 2 | 0.125 | 0 | 0 |
Jaguar Land Rover Canada, ULC | 57 | 0.125 | 0 | 0 |
McLaren Automotive Ltd. | 195 | 0.125 | 0 | 0 |
Table 10 presents the summary of the company average NMOG+NOx SFTP values for their LDV/LDT1 120k fleets.
Company | Total number of vehicles in fleet | Fleet average NMOG+NOx value (grams/mile) |
Total 2019 MY credits | Credit balance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd. | 2 | 0.125 | 0 | 0 |
Jaguar Land Rover Canada, ULC | 57 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 |
McLaren Automotive Ltd. | 195 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 |
3.1.2. Light-duty vehicles and light-duty trucks 1, 150k
Table 11 presents the summary of the company average NMOG+NOx FTP values for their LDV/LDT1 150k fleets.
Company | Total number of vehicles in fleet | Fleet average NMOG+NOx value (grams/mile) |
Total 2019 MY credits | Credit balance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd. | 146 | 0.125 | 0 | 0 |
BMW Group Canada | 23 245 | 0.055876 | 375 | 2 062 |
FCA Canada Inc. | 10 010 | 0.11258 | -406 | -1 406 |
Ferrari North America, Inc. | 364 | 0.125 | 0 | 0 |
Ford Motor Company of Canada, Ltd. | 28 635 | 0.082149 | -291 | -641 |
General Motors of Canada Company | 66 623 | 0.065138 | 457 | -1 226 |
Honda Canada Inc. | 173 915 | 0.0933256 | 0 | 0 |
Hyundai Auto Canada Corp. | 115 753 | 0.0710509 | 0 | 0 |
Jaguar Land Rover Canada, ULC | 510 | 0.0486 | 12 | 99 |
Kia Canada Inc. | 64 285 | 0.071422 | 37 | -291 |
Maserati North America, Inc. | 172 | 0.160 | 0 | 0 |
Mazda Canada Inc. | 36 709 | 0.080244 | -303 | 1 809 |
Mercedes-Benz Canada Inc. | 17 214 | 0.065886 | 105 | 620 |
Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Canada | 11 460 | 0.070000 | 23 | 137 |
Nissan Canada Inc. | 84 027 | 0.061281 | 901 | 2 096 |
Porsche Cars Canada, Ltd. | 2 130 | 0.1432 | 0 | 0 |
Roush Performance | 20 | 0.125 | 0 | 0 |
Subaru Canada, Inc. | 36 430 | 0.064422 | 0 | 0 |
Tesla Motors Canada Inc. | 13 364 | 0.00000 | 962 | 1 970 |
Toyota Canada Inc. | 86 011 | 0.082336 | -889 | 2 134 |
Volkswagen Group Canada | 78 118 | 0.041290 | 2 399 | 4 878 |
Volvo Cars of Canada Corp. | 1 762 | 0.03168 | 0 | 0 |
Table 12 presents the summary of the company average NMOG+NOx SFTP values for their LDV/LDT1 150k fleets.
Company | Total number of vehicles in fleet | Fleet average NMOG+NOx value (grams/mile) |
Total 2019 MY credits | Credit balance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd. | 146 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 |
BMW Group Canada | 148 | 0.090 | 437 | 2 300 |
FCA Canada Inc. | 23 245 | 0.071210 | -139 | 706 |
Ferrari North America, Inc. | 10 010 | 0.10386 | 0 | 0 |
Ford Motor Company of Canada, Ltd. | 364 | 0.125 | 28 | 1 623 |
General Motors of Canada Company | 28 635 | 0.089027 | 1 096 | 1 681 |
Honda Canada Inc. | 66 623 | 0.073550 | 0 | 0 |
Hyundai Auto Canada Corp. | 173 915 | 0.0871023 | 0 | 0 |
Jaguar Land Rover Canada, ULC | 115 753 | 0.0717048 | 0 | 0 |
Kia Canada Inc. | 64 285 | 0.071935 | 1 161 | 1 161 |
Maserati North America, Inc. | 172 | 0.130 | 0 | 0 |
Mazda Canada Inc. | 36 709 | 0.082311 | 282 | 4 248 |
Mercedes-Benz Canada Inc. | 17 214 | 0.075468 | 250 | 1 943 |
Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Canada | 11 460 | 0.090000 | 0 | 88 |
Nissan Canada Inc. | 84 027 | 0.070797 | 1 614 | 3 249 |
Porsche Cars Canada, Ltd. | 2 130 | 0.08945 | 0 | 0 |
Roush Performance | 20 | 0.110 | 0 | 0 |
Subaru Canada, Inc. | 36 430 | 0.056321 | 0 | 0 |
Tesla Motors Canada Inc. | 13 364 | 0.00000 | 1 203 | 2 431 |
Toyota Canada Inc. | 86 011 | 0.066530 | 2 019 | 3 677 |
Volkswagen Group Canada | 78 118 | 0.049673 | 3 150 | 7 502 |
Volvo Cars of Canada Corp. | 1 762 | 0.08027 | 0 | 0 |
3.1.3 Light-duty trucks 2, heavy light-duty trucks, and medium-duty passenger vehicles
Table 13 presents the summary of the company average NMOG+NOx FTP values for their LDT2/HLDT/MDPV fleets.
Company | Total number of vehicles in fleet | Fleet average NMOG+NOx value (grams/mile) |
Total 2019 MY credits | Credit balance |
---|---|---|---|---|
BMW Group Canada | 18 585 | 0.078501 | 84 | -253 |
FCA Canada Inc. | 223 309 | 0.0899421 | -1 550 | -5 616 |
Ford Motor Company of Canada, Ltd. | 200 389 | 0.0808142 | 438 | -1 429 |
General Motors of Canada Company | 180 808 | 0.0787169 | 774 | -3 852 |
Honda Canada Inc. | 30 399 | 0.10287 | 0 | 0 |
Jaguar Land Rover Canada, ULC | 11 678 | 0.071880 | 130 | 631 |
Kia Canada Inc. | 6 942 | 0.07376 | 64 | 64 |
Maserati North America, Inc. | 291 | 0.160 | 0 | 0 |
Mazda Canada Inc. | 33 683 | 0.064944 | 608 | 1 082 |
Mercedes-Benz Canada Inc. | 19 918 | 0.082573 | 9 | -83 |
Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Canada | 6 950 | 0.05798 | 174 | 495 |
Nissan Canada Inc. | 57 258 | 0.0061467 | 4 400 | 4 195 |
Porsche Cars Canada, Ltd. | 5 723 | 0.07573 | 0 | 0 |
Subaru Canada, Inc. | 29 723 | 0.074586 | 0 | 0 |
Toyota Canada Inc. | 117 897 | 0.0671016 | 1 874 | -208 |
Volkswagen Group Canada | 50 314 | 0.069760 | 666 | 674 |
Volvo Cars of Canada Corp. | 10 116 | 0.042329 | 0 | 0 |
Table 14 presents the summary of the company average NMOG+NOx SFTP values for their LDT2/HLDT/MDPV fleets.
Company | Total number of vehicles in fleet | Fleet average NMOG+NOx value (grams/mile) |
Total 2019 MY credits | Credit balance |
---|---|---|---|---|
BMW Group Canada | 18 585 | 0.084998 | 93 | 649 |
FCA Canada Inc. | 223 309 | 0.0840609 | 1 326 | 318 |
Ford Motor Company of Canada, Ltd. | 200 389 | 0.0841144 | 1 179 | 2 776 |
General Motors of Canada Company | 180 808 | 0.0873858 | 473 | -943 |
Honda Canada Inc. | 30 399 | 0.094098 | 0 | 0 |
Jaguar Land Rover Canada, ULC | 11 678 | 0.097049 | 0 | 0 |
Kia Canada Inc. | 6 942 | 0.07410 | 110 | 110 |
Maserati North America, Inc. | 291 | 0.130 | 0 | 0 |
Mazda Canada Inc. | 33 683 | 0.069594 | 687 | 2 227 |
Mercedes-Benz Canada Inc. | 19 918 | 0.062446 | 549 | 1 977 |
Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Canada | 6 950 | 0.090000 | 0 | 83 |
Nissan Canada Inc. | 57 258 | 0.071632 | 1 052 | 991 |
Porsche Cars Canada, Ltd. | 5 723 | 0.08095 | 0 | 0 |
Subaru Canada, Inc. | 29 723 | 0.056031 | 0 | 0 |
Toyota Canada Inc. | 117 897 | 0.0700041 | 2 357 | 3 939 |
Volkswagen Group Canada | 50 314 | 0.070697 | 971 | 2 645 |
Volvo Cars of Canada Corp. | 10 116 | 0.082013 | 0 | 0 |
3.1.4 Class 2B vehicles
Table 15 presents the summary of the company average NMOG+NOx FTP values for their Class 2B vehicle fleets.
Company | Total number of vehicles in fleet | Fleet average NMOG+NOx value (grams/mile) |
Total 2019 MY credits | Credit balance |
---|---|---|---|---|
FCA Canada Inc. | 13 891 | 0.24583 | 100 | 1 341 |
Ford Motor Company of Canada, Ltd. | 32 722 | 0.24637 | 217 | 1 066 |
General Motors of Canada Company | 21 595 | 0.25000 | 65 | -442 |
Mercedes-Benz Canada Inc. | 5 254 | 0.1902 | 330 | 403 |
3.1.5 Class 3 vehicles
Table 16 presents the summary of the company average NMOG+NOx FTP values for their Class 3 fleets.
Company | Total number of vehicles in fleet | Fleet average NMOG+NOx value (grams/mile) |
Total 2019 MY credits | Credit balance |
---|---|---|---|---|
FCA Canada Inc. | 7 326 | 0.3280 | 528 | 774 |
Ford Motor Company of Canada, Ltd. | 24 769 | 0.50745 | -2 662 | -2 725 |
General Motors of Canada Company | 10 841 | 0.40000 | 0 | 614 |
Mercedes-Benz Canada Inc. | 1 318 | 0.2300 | 224 | 216 |
Average NMOG+NOx values above the applicable NMOG+NOx standards for a given fleet can be attributed to the following factors:
- the company elects to exclude from mandatory compliance with the fleet average NMOG+NOx standard its group of U.S. certified vehicles that are sold in Canada and the U.S. (this exclusion is allowed because the objective of the fleet averaging provisions is to achieve an overall Canadian vehicle fleet emission performance comparable to that of the U.S., while minimizing the regulatory burden on companies; an analysis conducted by Environment and Climate Change Canada indicated that, even under extreme scenarios, the variations between the Canadian and U.S. fleet averages are expected to be small)
- the company made use of an interim provision allowing them to include their LDV/LDT1 120k mile useful life vehicles certified to bins greater than bin 70 in their LDV/LDT1 150k mile useful life fleet (this interim provision may be used through MY 2019; this allows their LDV/LDT1 120k vehicles to meet the less stringent standard of the LDV/LDT1 150k fleet)
- the average NMOG+NOx value is above the NMOG+NOx standard for 1 of its fleets (a company can offset a deficit from 1 fleet with credits from another fleet within the same averaging set)
- the average NMOG+NOx value is above the applicable standard (a company can offset a deficit in a subsequent MY)
3.1.6 NMOG+NOx averaging sets
NMOG+NOx credits may be exchanged only within an averaging set, as follows:
- LDV and LDT1 certified to standards based on a useful life of 120 000 miles and 10 years
- LDV and LDT
- HDV
However, FTP and SFTP credits are not interchangeable.
3.1.7. Early action credits
Early Action credits are earned over the 2015-2016 MYs for a company’s fleet of LDV/LDT1 vehicles and over the 2016-2017 MYs for a company’s fleet of LDT2/HLDT/MDPV vehicles if the respective NMOG+NOx fleet averages are below the 0.160 standard.
Early action credits are also earned over the 2016-2017 MYs for a company’s fleet of Class 2B vehicles or fleet of Class 3 vehicles if the respective NMOG+NOx fleet averages are below the applicable standards for the MY in question set out in table 8.
3.1.8. Overall performance of Canadian fleets
Figure 2 shows the overall Canadian NMOG+NOx fleet averages from the 2015 to 2019 MYs for the LDV/LDT1 and LDT2/HLDT/MDPV fleets.
Figure 2: NMOG+NOx fleet averages and standards for the light-duty vehicle and light-duty truck 1 fleet and the light-duty truck 2, heavy light-duty trucks and medium-duty passenger vehicles fleet
Long description for figure 2
Figure 2 shows the overall Canadian NMOG+NOx fleet averages from the 2015 to 2019 MY for the LDV/LDT1 and LDT2/HLDT/MDPV fleets.
Year | LDV/LDT1 fleet average | LDT2/HLDT/MDPV fleet average | Fully phased-in standard | LDV/LDT1 standard | LDT2/HLDT/MDPV standard |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2015 | 0.1465676 | - | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.16 |
2016 | 0.1366518 | 0.1336806 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.16 |
2017 | 0.09370673 | 0.1113309 | 0.03 | 0.086 | 0.101 |
2018 | 0.07638061 | 0.09138542 | 0.03 | 0.079 | 0.092 |
2019 | 0.06664580 | 0.07528215 | 0.03 | 0.072 | 0.083 |
Figure 3 shows the overall Canadian NMOG+NOx fleet averages from the 2018 to 2019 MY for the Class 2B and Class 3 fleets.
Figure 3: NMOG+NOx fleet averages and standards for the Class 2B fleet and the Class 3 fleet
Long description for figure 3
Year | Class 2B fleet average | Class 3 fleet average | Fully phased-in class 2B standard | Fully phased-in class 3 standard | Class 2B standard | Class 3 standard |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | 0.24563 | 0.45054 | 0.178 | 0.247 | 0.278 | 0.451 |
2019 | 0.24332 | 0.44316 | 0.178 | 0.247 | 0.253 | 0.400 |
3.2 Fleet average cold NMHC emission performance
This section describes the manufacturer’s cold NMHC fleet average performance.
Table 17 presents the fleet average cold temperature NMHC exhaust emission standards.
Vehicle weight category | Cold temperature NMHC sales- weighted fleet average standard (grams/mile) |
---|---|
LDV and LLDT | 0.3 |
HLDT | 0.5 |
3.2.1 Light-duty vehicles and light light-duty trucks
Table 18 presents the summary of company average cold NMHC values for their LDV/LLDT fleets.
Company | Total number of vehicles in fleet | Fleet average cold NMHC value (grams/mile) |
Total 2019 MY credits | Credit balance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd. | 148 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
BMW Group Canada | 32 978 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
FCA Canada Inc. | 63 590 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Ferrari North America, Inc. | 364 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Ford Motor Company of Canada, Ltd. | 97 253 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
General Motors of Canada Company | 115 519 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Honda Canada Inc. | 189 695 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Hyundai Auto Canada Corp. | 111 169 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Jaguar Land Rover Canada, ULC | 5 608 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Kia Canada Inc. | 70 041 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Maserati North America, Inc. | 172 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Mazda Canada Inc. | 70 208 | 0.2 | 7 021 | 15 293 |
McLaren Automotive Ltd. | 195 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Mercedes-Benz Canada Inc. | 31 114 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Canada | 18 410 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Nissan Canada Inc. | 133 316 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Porsche Cars Canada, Ltd. | 3 744 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Roush Performance | 20 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
Subaru Canada, Inc. | 66 153 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Toyota Canada Inc. | 183 208 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Volkswagen Group Canada | 107 989 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Volvo Cars of Canada Corp. | 8 650 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 |
3.2.2 Heavy light-duty trucks and medium-duty passenger vehicles
Table 19 presents the summary of company average cold NMHC values for their HLDT/MDPV fleets.
Company | Total number of vehicles in fleet | Fleet average NMHC value (grams/mile) |
Total 2019 MY credits | Credit balance |
---|---|---|---|---|
BMW Group Canada | 8 783 | 0.3 | 1 757 | 3 135 |
FCA Canada Inc. | 167 068 | 0.4 | 16 707 | 45 201 |
Ford Motor Company of Canada, Ltd. | 129 858 | 0.4 | 12 986 | 40 544 |
General Motors of Canada Company | 123 811 | 0.4 | 12 381 | 38 846 |
Honda Canada Inc. | 14 619 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Jaguar Land Rover Canada, ULC | 4 209 | 0.4 | 421 | 951 |
Maserati North America, Inc. | 291 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
Mercedes-Benz Canada Inc. | 5 877 | 0.3 | 1 175 | 1 175 |
Nissan Canada Inc. | 3 629 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
Porsche Cars Canada, Ltd. | 4 109 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Toyota Canada Inc. | 20 504 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
Volkswagen Group Canada | 18 501 | 0.3 | 3 700 | 5 263 |
Volvo Cars of Canada Corp. | 3 228 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
3.3 Fleet average EVAP emission performance
This section describes the manufacturers EVAP fleet average performance.
Table 20 presents the fleet average EVAP emission standards.
Vehicle category | Low-altitude conditions - fleet average |
---|---|
LDV, LDT1 | 0.3 |
LDT2 | 0.4 |
HLDT | 0.5 |
HDV | 0.6 |
3.3.1 Light-duty vehicles and light-duty trucks 1
Table 21 presents the summary of company average EVAP values for their LDV/LDT1 fleets.
Company | Total number of vehicles in fleet | Fleet average EVAP value (grams/mile) |
Total 2019 MY credits | Credit balance |
---|---|---|---|---|
BMW Group Canada | 21 489 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
FCA Canada Inc. | 879 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Ford Motor Company of Canada, Ltd. | 16 830 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
General Motors of Canada Company | 1 702 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Honda Canada Inc. | 135 375 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Hyundai Auto Canada Corp. | 94 570 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Jaguar Land Rover Canada, ULC | 423 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Kia Canada Inc. | 57 835 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Mazda Canada Inc. | 17 294 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Mercedes-Benz Canada Inc. | 14 289 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Canada | 11 460 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Nissan Canada Inc. | 69 133 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Porsche Cars Canada, Ltd. | 1 102 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 |
Subaru Canada, Inc. | 31 812 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Toyota Canada Inc. | 50 618 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Volkswagen Group Canada | 70 931 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Volvo Cars of Canada Corp. | 1 762 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
3.3.2 Light-duty trucks 2
Table 22 presents the summary of company average EVAP values for their LDT2 fleets.
Company | Total number of vehicles in fleet | Fleet average EVAP value (grams/mile) |
Total 2019 MY credits | Credit balance |
---|---|---|---|---|
BMW Group Canada | 9 802 | 0.3 | 980 | 1 792 |
FCA Canada Inc. | 51 853 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 |
Ford Motor Company of Canada, Ltd. | 64 936 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 |
General Motors of Canada Company | 52 833 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 |
Honda Canada Inc. | 8 970 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 |
Jaguar Land Rover Canada, ULC | 5 051 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 |
Kia Canada Inc. | 6 468 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 |
Mazda Canada Inc. | 21 361 | 0.3 | 2 136 | 6 661 |
Mercedes-Benz Canada Inc. | 1 941 | 0.3 | 194 | 330 |
Mitsubishi Motor Sales of Canada | 6 950 | 0.3 | 695 | 1 876 |
Nissan Canada Inc. | 32 253 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 |
Porsche Cars Canada, Ltd. | 1 614 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 |
Subaru Canada, Inc. | 26 691 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
Toyota Canada Inc. | 97 393 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 |
Volkswagen Group Canada | 30 895 | 0.4 | 0 | 0 |
Volvo Cars of Canada Corp. | 6 888 | 0.3 | 0 | 0 |
3.3.3. Heavy light-duty trucks and medium-duty passenger vehicles
Table 23 presents the summary of company average EVAP values for their HLTD/MDPV fleets.
Company | Total number of vehicles in fleet | Fleet average EVAP value (grams/mile) |
Total 2019 MY credits | Credit balance |
---|---|---|---|---|
BMW Group Canada | 8 271 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
FCA Canada Inc. | 106 341 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
Ford Motor Company of Canada, Ltd. | 122 655 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
General Motors of Canada Company | 123 797 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
Honda Canada Inc. | 14 619 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
Jaguar Land Rover Canada, ULC | 1 808 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
Mercedes-Benz Canada Inc. | 5 877 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
Nissan Canada Inc. | 1 602 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
Porsche Cars Canada, Ltd. | 4 109 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
Toyota Canada Inc. | 1 677 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
Volkswagen Group Canada | 14 774 | 0.4 | 1 477 | 1 477 |
Volvo Cars of Canada Corp. | 3 228 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
3.3.4. Class 2B and Class 3 vehicles
Table 24 presents the summary of company average EVAP values for their Class 2B and Class 3 fleets.
Company | Total number of vehicles in fleet | Fleet average EVAP value (grams/mile) |
Total 2019 MY credits | Credit balance |
---|---|---|---|---|
General Motors of Canada Company | 5 793 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 |
3.3.5 Evaporative emission averaging sets
The following separate averaging sets apply for evaporative emission standards:
- LDV and LDT1 together represent a single averaging set
- LDT2 represents a single averaging set
- HLDT represents a single averaging set
- HDV represents a single averaging set
Credits can be exchanged across averaging sets as follows if additional credits are needed to offset a deficit after the final year of maintaining deficit credits:
- you may exchange LDV/LDT1 and LDT2 emission credits
- you may exchange HLDT and HDV emission credits
3.4 PM and EVAP phase-in performance
For the 2019 MY, 40% of a company’s fleet of light-duty vehicles, light-duty trucks and medium-duty passenger vehicles and 40% of a company’s fleet of Class 2b and Class 3 vehicles must meet the Tier 3 PM standards and 60% of a company’s overall fleet must meet the Tier 3 EVAP standards. All companies met these requirements.
4. Conclusions
The 2019 MY results represents the third reporting cycle under the new more stringent Tier 3 emission standards. All companies subject to reporting requirements submitted end of MY reports comprising a total of 1 972 856 vehicles manufactured in Canada or imported into Canada for the purpose of first retail sale.
The average NMOG+NOx value for the Canadian 2019 MY combined fleet of light-duty vehicles and light-duty trucks 1 is 0.06664580 grams/mile compared to the standards of 0.072 grams/mile. The average NMOG+NOx value for the Canadian 2019 MY combined fleet of light-duty trucks 2, heavy-light duty trucks and medium-duty passenger vehicles is 0.07528215 grams/mile compared to the standard of 0.083 grams/mile. The average NMOG+NOx value for the Canadian 2019 MY fleet of Class 2B vehicles is 0.24332 grams/mile compared to the standard of 0.253 grams/mile. The average NMOG+NOx value for the Canadian 2019 MY fleet of Class 3 vehicles is 0.44316 grams/mile compared to the standard of 0.400 grams/mile.
The overall NMOG+NOx fleet averages demonstrate industry improvements in emission performance. While the fleet average value for the Class 3 fleet is above the applicable standards for the 2019 MY, companies have 3 years to offset any deficits incurred, and all currently remain in compliance with the fleet averaging provisions of the Regulations.
All companies have complied with the 2019 PM and EVAP phase-in percentages and have met the cold NMHC fleet average standards.
Page details
- Date modified: