Evaluation of the Clean Air Agenda’s International Actions Theme

Final Draft Report

Audit and Evaluation Branch March 2016

PDF (515 KB)

Report Clearance Steps

Planning phase completed November 2014
Report sent for management response June 2015
Management response received July 2015
Report completed July 2015
Report approved by Natural Resources Canada’s Deputy Minister December 2015
Report approved by Environment and Climate Change Canada’s Deputy Minister March 2016

Acronyms used in the report

ADM
Assistant Deputy Minister
CAA
Clean Air Agenda
CCAC
Climate and Clean Air Coalition
CCI
Climate Change International
CCS
Carbon Capture and Storage
CED
Clean Energy Dialogue
CEM
Clean Energy Ministerial
CESD
Commissioner of the Environment and Sustainable Development
COP
Conference of the Parties
CTCN
Climate Technology Centre and Network
CTI
Clean Technology Initiative
DFATD
Department of Foreign Affairs Trade and Development
DG
Director General
DM
Deputy Minister
DOE
Department of Energy (U.S.)
DPR
Departmental Performance Report
ECCC
Environment and Climate Change Canada
FSDS
Federal Sustainable Development Strategy
G&Cs
Grants and Contributions
GHG
Greenhouse Gas
GMI
Global Methane Initiative
IAI
Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research
IPCC
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
LULUCF
Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry
MEF
Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate
NFCMARS
National Forest Carbon Monitoring, Accounting and Reporting System
NRCan
Natural Resources Canada
PMF
Performance Measurement Framework
R&D
Research and Development
REDD
Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation
RPP
Report on Plans and Performance
SFT
Speech from the Throne
SLCPs
Short-Lived Climate Pollutants
UNFCCC
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
USEPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Acknowledgments

The Evaluation Project Team would like to thank the individuals who contributed to this project, particularly members of the Horizontal Evaluation Steering Committee, as well as all interviewees who provided insights and comments crucial to this evaluation.

The Evaluation Project Team was led by Robert Tkaczyk, under the direction of the Environment and Climate Change Canada Evaluation Director, William Blois and included Urszula Adamik and Kevin Marple. The evaluation was conducted by Goss Gilroy Inc., with input from the Evaluation Project Team, Audit and Evaluation Branch of Environment and Climate Change Canada, and the Horizontal Evaluation Steering Committee, composed of program and evaluation representatives from Environment and Climate Change Canada and Natural Resources Canada.

Executive Summary

Context

This report presents the results of the evaluation of the Clean Air Agenda (CAA) International Actions Theme, conducted by Environment and Climate Change Canada’s Audit and Evaluation Branch between October 2014 and March 2015.

The purpose of the evaluation was to assess the relevance and performance of the CAA International Actions Theme and to support its funding renewal. It was also conducted to meet the requirements of the Financial Administration Act and the Treasury Board Policy on Evaluation.

The CAA International Actions Theme’s overall objective is to participate in international partnerships and negotiations to achieve the Theme’s two expected final outcomes: fair, effective and comprehensive international action to address climate change, and innovation in clean energy resulting in global and domestic economic and environmental benefits. The CAA International Actions Theme supports the Government of Canada’s broader initiative known as the Clean Air Agenda, and is delivered jointly by Environment and Climate Change Canada (which is the lead department) and Natural Resources Canada. The CAA represents a part of the government’s broader efforts to address the challenges of climate change and air pollution, with a view to building a clean and healthy environment.

The CAA International Actions Theme ensures that international obligations are met through three key areas of activity, which were the focus of the evaluation:

  1. International Climate Change Obligations - the payment of contributions to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research;
  2. International Climate Change Participation/Negotiations - engagement in strategic international climate change consultations and negotiations, as well as related technical and policy analysis and advice provided in the context of clean energy, clean energy technologies and forest carbon issues. This includes the management of Canada’s fast-start financing as part of the Copenhagen Accord, but not the projects funded through this financing; and
  3. Continued Engagement and Alignment with the United States / the Clean Energy Dialogue - activities that foster enhanced engagement and alignment between Canada and the United States on clean energy technology and innovation.

The total budget for the CAA International Actions Theme was $52.8 million from 2011--2012 to 2015-2016, divided between Environment and Climate Change Canada ($28.8 million) and Natural Resources Canada ($24.0 million). The Theme was originally resourced for $62.8 million over five years; however, $10 million associated with the Department of Foreign Affairs Trade and Development was eliminated as a result of decisions taken in response to Budget 2012.

The evaluation covered the period from fiscal year 2011-2012 to the first quarter of fiscal year 2014-2015 (i.e., April 1, 2011, to June 30, 2014). Given that the current round of CAA International Actions Theme funding addresses the five-year period ending March 31, 2016, consideration was given to the extent to which the program is on track to meet its 2015-2016 deliverables.

Findings and Conclusions

Relevance

The evaluation concluded that the international actions completed under the program were required in order to find comprehensive solutions to climate change as a complex global issue and to meet to discuss Canada’s international interests. The program is aligned with overall federal government priorities, as expressed in Speeches from the Throne and Budgets, as well as Departmental Strategic Outcomes and international commitments. The program is consistent with federal roles and responsibilities for international environmental agreements. Shared jurisdiction with provinces and territories means that they must be involved in implementation of such agreements and have a shared interest in the Theme’s outcomes.

Efficiency and Economy

The program design is appropriate, with separately delivered key areas of activity that contribute to similar outcomes (i.e., the Clean Energy Dialogue is delivered separately). There are a variety of governance mechanisms for various components of the program, with clear collaboration mechanisms between Environment and Climate Change Canada and Natural Resources Canada. Overall, governance is clear and appropriate, although provinces and territories expressed a desire for deeper engagement with the federal government. However, the overall strategy for the CAA International Actions Theme that guides it toward fair, effective and comprehensive international actions and innovation in clean energy is not apparent to all stakeholders, and there are further opportunities to promote Canadian achievements in international fora.

The Theme’s activities are generally thought to be efficient; in particular, the Environment and Climate Change Canada-led assessed contributions have relatively low administrative costs, and additional activities were undertaken to respond to changes in government priorities and additional demands.

Performance information related to the CAA International Actions Theme is collected regularly and reported publicly. Although performance targets are not identified, it would be difficult to define targets given the nature of the expected shared outcomes.

Achievement of Intended Outcomes

Overall, progress has been made toward achieving the CAA International Actions Theme’s expected outcomes. The Theme has fulfilled its financial obligations, promoted the Government of Canada’s climate change objectives in international fora, met a majority of the Government of Canada’s objectives (and the objectives of its key allies) for negotiations and agreements, worked with international partners to advance clean technologies through a number of initiatives such as the Clean Energy Ministerial and Clean Energy Dialogue, and engaged in bilateral and multilateral initiatives on climate change, short-lived climate pollutants, forest carbon, climate financing and clean energy that advance Canada’s overall climate change interests.

With respect to the Theme’s final outcomes, there is evidence to suggest that the Government of Canada’s objectives are being achieved in key United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change meetings. Also, Canadian investments in clean energy have increased over the evaluation timeframe. However, it is difficult to ascertain the extent to which the Government of Canada’s (or any other country’s) interventions were influential in securing these objectives.

The CAA International Actions Theme was influenced by a variety of external factors that have impacted the program’s success and direction, including changes in the positions of other countries (particularly the United States, with whom Canada’s position has been historically aligned due to the high level of integration of the North American economy), and changes in the economic climate that can impact clean energy and technology investments.

Recommendations

The following recommendations are directed to Environment and Climate Change Canada (Assistant Deputy Minister (ADM), International Affairs Branch) and Natural Resources Canada (ADM, Canadian Forest Service; ADM, Energy Sector; and ADM, Science and Policy Integration) as the departments jointly responsible for the program.

Recommendation 1:

Improve opportunities for provinces and territories to support the departments’ Clean Air International activities.

Despite continued engagement through such mechanisms as the broad federal/provincial/territorial working group on international climate change, as well as issue-specific mechanisms such as the National Forest Sinks Committee, many provincial and territorial representatives feel that engagement is insufficiently frequent or comprehensive, and they are unclear how their inputs to international negotiations are used. Consequently, sub-national and regional fora have been used by non-federal entities to engage internationally and influence climate change negotiations separately from the federal government. Given the role that provinces and territories play in climate change and clean energy, their engagement can help to articulate region-specific issues and opportunities to more fully inform international positions. Existing mechanisms for engagement should be reviewed and strengthened and/or better communicated (as appropriate) so that provinces and territories have improved opportunities to support Clean Air International activities.

Recommendation 2:

Develop and communicate to stakeholders an overarching strategy that defines the mechanisms and processes by which the objectives of the CAA International Actions Theme are expected to be realized.

Despite the existence of a program logic model and various Government of Canada websites which list actions being taken internationally and domestically, there is no central communications tool for the Theme to communicate its strategy and objectives to partners and stakeholders. Provinces and territories, in particular, would find such information useful to help them understand what is to be achieved through the CAA International Actions Theme, how it will affect them, and how they can best contribute.

Recommendation 3:

Identify ways to showcase the achievements and expertise of Canada’s public and private sectors in order to better support international actions and demonstrate that Canada is taking action and achieving results.

The evaluation identified that there were opportunities to better publicize domestic achievements to the international community in such areas as clean technology, climate change adaptation areas and Canada’s Forest Carbon Budget Model. The design of the CAA, with separate international and domestic Themes, means that it is sometimes challenging to share information across CAA program areas in order to profile domestic achievements in international fora.

The responsible Assistant Deputy Ministers from Environment and Climate Change Canada and Natural Resources Canada agree with all three recommendations and have developed joint management responses that appropriately address each of the recommendations. The full management response can be found in Section 6 of the report.

1.0 Introduction

This report presents the results of the horizontal Evaluation of the Clean Air Agenda (CAA)’s International Actions Theme, which covers the timeframe from April 1, 2011, to June 30, 2014. The evaluation was conducted by Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC)’s Evaluation Division, Audit and Evaluation Branch, in fiscal years 2014-2015 and 2015-2016, with input from Natural Resources Canada (NRCan)’s Strategic Evaluation Division. The evaluation was identified in the 2014 Departmental Risk-Based Audit and Evaluation Plan. The evaluation was conducted in order to meet the coverage requirements of the Financial Administration Act and the Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat Policy on Evaluation, which require that an evaluation of all ongoing grants and contributions (G&Cs) and direct program spending be conducted at least once every five years

2.0 Background or Context

2.1 Program Profile

The International Actions Theme is part of the Government of Canada’s broader initiative known as the CAA. The CAA addresses climate change and air pollution at the domestic, continental and international levels and involves 11 federal departments and agencies which provide programs organized under five themes:

  1. clean air regulatory agenda (CARA);
  2. clean energy;
  3. clean transportation;
  4. international actions; and
  5. adaptation.

The overall objective of the CAA International Actions Theme, approved in 2007 and renewed in 2011, is to participate in international partnerships and negotiations to achieve the Theme’s two expected final outcomes: fair, effective and comprehensive international action to address climate change, and global and domestic economic and environmental benefits resulting from innovation in clean energy.

ECCC is the lead department for the CAA International Actions Theme, in partnership with and including the activities of NRCan. It includes three key areas of activity which are detailed below.

1. International Climate Change Obligations

This area focuses on actions related to compliance with existing treaties, including payment of assessed contributions to the United Nations Climate Change Secretariat and contributions to other international climate change initiatives through G&Cs. As part of this program element, Canada provides annual assessed contributions to international organizations that play a key role in enhancing the analysis and assessment of options related to the development of a future climate change agreement under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), as well as to the UNFCCC itself, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI) to support their work in providing policy-relevant science information on climate change. The evaluation covered all assessed contributions under this key area of activity.

2. International Climate Change Participation/Negotiations

This area focuses on Canada’s international activities related to climate change. Such activities involve engagement in strategic international climate change consultations, as well as discussions and negotiations across a number of multilateral fora on behalf of the Canadian Government. Such efforts aim to advance Canada’s national interests in the negotiations under the UNFCCC and in international processes that complement the UNFCCC negotiations.

Efforts related to the UNFCCC revolve in large measure around negotiations under the 2011 Durban Platform for Enhanced Action toward a new, global post-2020 framework agreement. The purpose of the framework agreement would be to ensure the widest possible cooperation by all countries and their participation in an effective and appropriate international response for the reduction of global greenhouse gas emissions. Key negotiating issues relate to post-2020 mitigation commitments, adaptation and means of implementation. These negotiations on a framework agreement are expected to be concluded at the Conference of the Parties (COP) 21 (France, 2015), with the new agreement to come into force in 2020. As part of these negotiations, there will be increased pressure on Canada and other developed nations to increase their support for developing countries’ efforts, including through the Green Climate Fund. Ongoing negotiations are likely to be needed after 2015 to elaborate aspects of the framework agreement.

This area involves ECCC and NRCan technical and policy analysis and advice provided in the context of climate change, clean energy, clean energy technologies, and forest carbon issues to support Canada’s approach to international climate change. This expertise is essential for developing an appropriate balanced Canadian position (i.e., reflecting domestic environmental, energy and natural resource interests) in the international climate change arena. ECCC is the overall lead for climate change negotiations and NRCan is responsible for representing Canada at international negotiations and meetings related to clean energy technologies (development, deployment, diffusion and transfer) and land use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) and reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) and for providing related policy support in these areas. For example, NRCan leads on technology negotiations under the UNFCCC process, and leads Canada’s engagement in the Clean Energy Ministerial (CEM) where Canada contributes to international collaboration on clean energy technologies.

In addition to the UNFCCC, ECCC and NRCan participate in a number of other fora, including the following:

ECCC is the lead department on climate finance and oversaw the delivery of Canada’s fast-start financingFootnote2. The evaluation did not cover the G&Cs funded through the Fast-Start Financing Initiative itself, as these will be covered as part of another evaluation. It did, however, examine ECCC’s management and oversight of the fast-start financing process

3. Continued Engagement and Alignment with the U.S. / Clean Energy Dialogue

The Clean Energy Dialogue (CED) fosters enhanced engagement and alignment between Canada and the U.S. on clean energy technology and innovation. The explicit goal of the project is to “enhance collaboration on the development of clean energy technologies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and address climate change.”

The CED is managed separately from the international climate change participation/negotiations and obligations but contributes to related outcomes. As such, it is included within the CAA International Actions Theme for administrative, coordination and reporting purposes.

To advance the CED objectives, the U.S. and Canada established three bilateral government Working Groups to identify key opportunities for collaboration in each of the following priority areas:

  1. developing and deploying clean energy technologies (with a focus on carbon capture and storage (CCS));
  2. building a more efficient electricity grid based on clean and renewable electricity; and
  3. clean energy research and development and energy efficiency.

A CED Action Plan II, which builds on the achievements of CED Action Plan I, was released in June 2012. Action Plan II originally set a two-year framework for the CED, but work continues under this plan, as reported in the CED’s Third Report to Leaders. In this action plan, a greater emphasis is placed on energy efficiency to take advantage of an expanded array of opportunities.

The CED Secretariat is led by ECCC and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and working groups are composed of government officials from the DOE, NRCan, and ECCC. Canada’s Minister of Environment and the U.S. Secretary of Energy co-lead the CED. Initiatives typically involve NRCan, ECCC and DOE and include the participation, as required, of other government departments, representatives of the private sector, provincial, state and territorial governments, and academia.

2.2 Governance and Management

ECCC’s Climate Change International Directorate (CCI) delivers the CAA International Actions Theme in partnership with other ECCC and NRCan organizations. The Assistant Deputy Minister (ADM) International Affairs Branch is the program lead.

The following groups contribute to this Theme on behalf of ECCC:

The following groups contribute to this Theme on behalf of NRCan:

The Director General (DG) Committee on International Actions is the overarching coordinating body for the Theme and convenes on a quarterly basis. The committee brings together DGs with responsibility for leading the implementation of different elements of the CAA International Actions Theme (see Annex 2 for a list of all implicated DGs) in order to provide a forum for information sharing and coordination.

ECCC has the overall lead for the CED, with the ADM of International Affairs Branch managing the Canadian Secretariat responsible for coordinating CED activities for the Government of Canada. NRCan’s ADM Science and Policy Integration has a supporting role and leads the coordination of the CED in NRCan (see Annex 2). The CED includes three working groups, overseen by ECCC’s ADM Science and Technology, NRCan’s ADM Innovation and Energy Technology, and NRCan’s ADM Energy Sector, with support from implicated DGs from NRCan and ECCC.

There are also a variety of partners and stakeholders involved in various aspects of the CAA International Actions Theme. The Federal, Provincial, Territorial Working Group on International Climate Change, established in September 2010, consults on Canadian policies related to international climate change negotiations and other complementary fora. A range of other groups and committees also exist; the key ones are described in more detail in Section 2.4.

2.3 Resource Allocation

The CAA International Actions Theme was allocated resources of $52.8 million over the five-year period from 2011-2012 to 2015-2016. Although the Theme was originally intended to receive $62.8 million over the same period, resources associated with the Department of Foreign Affairs Trade and Development (DFATD, then Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade) were eliminated following Budget 2012 decisions (approximately $9.5 million over the five-year period). ECCC absorbed costs associated with administering G&Cs that were originally intended to be funded by DFATD, although DFATD continues to provide the actual funding for the G&Cs themselves. Table 1 provides an overview of the original total budget; Table 2 details the allocations for the Theme for ECCC and NRCan by key area of activity for the first three years of the program, which were the focus of the evaluation.

Table 1 : CAA International Actions Theme Allocations (2011-2012 to 2015-2016) ECCC

ECCC
  2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 Total
Salary $3,737,778 $3,569,608 $3,569,608 $3,570,383 $3,570,383 $18,017,760
O&M $1,923,951 $1,820,734 $1,820,734 $1,819,307 $1,819,307 $9,204,033
G&Cs $325,000 $325,000 $325,000 $325,000 $325,000 $1,625,000
Sub-Total $5,986,729 $5,715,342 $5,715,342 $5,714,690 $5,714,690 $28,846,793
NRCan
  2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 Total
Salary $2,460,000 $2,460,000 $2,460,000 $2,460,000 $2,460,000 $12,300,000
O&M $1,776,200 $1,776,200 $1,776,200 $1,776,200 $1,776,200 $8,881,000
G&Cs $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
Sub-Total $4,236,200 $4,236,200 $4,236,200 $4,236,200 $4,236,200 $21,181,000
Overall
  2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 Total
ECCC $5,986,729 $5,715,342 $5,715,342 $5,714,690 $5,714,690 $28,846,793
NRCan $4,236,200 $4,236,200 $4,236,200 $4,236,200 $4,236,200 $21,181,000
AccommodationFootnote3 $568,726 $550,507 $550,507 $550,591 $550,591 $2,770,922
TOTAL $10,791,655 $10,502,049 $10,502,049 $10,501,481 $10,501,481 $52,798,715

Source: CAA International Actions Theme original program documents.

Table 2: CAA International Actions Theme Allocations by Key Area of Activity (2011-2012 to 2013-2014)

Clean Energy Dialogue
  ECCC Allocation 2011-2012 ECCC Allocation 2012-2013 ECCC Allocation 2013-2014 NRCan Allocation 2011-2012 NRCan Allocation 2012-2013 NRCan Allocation 2013-2014
Salary $416,335 $416,335 $416,333 $400,000 $400,000 $400,000
Employee Benefits $83,267 $83,267 $83,267 $80,000 $80,000 $80,000
O&M $346,656 $346,656 $346,657 $668,000 $668,000 $668,000
G&Cs 0 0 0 0 0 0
Accommodations $54,123 $54,123 $54,123 $52,000 $52,000 $52,000
Total $900,381 $900,381 $900,380 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000
Negotiations
  ECCC Allocation 2011-2012 ECCC Allocation 2012-2013 ECCC Allocation 2013-2014 NRCan Allocation 2011-2012 NRCan Allocation 2012-2013 NRCan Allocation 2013-2014
Salary $2,690,533 $2,550,391 $2,550,391 $1,650,000 $1,650,000 $1,650,000
Employee Benefits $538,107 $510,078 $510,078 $330,000 $330,000 $330,000
O&M $1,572,864 $1,469,646 $1,469,646 $1,108,200 $1,108,200 $1,108,200
G&Cs 0 0 0 0 0 0
Accommodations $349,769 $331,551 $331,551 $111,800 $111,800 $111,800
Total $5,151,273 $4,861,666 $4,861,666 $3,200,000 $3,200,000 $3,200,000
Obligations
  ECCC Allocation 2011-2012 ECCC Allocation 2012-2013 ECCC Allocation 2013-2014 NRCan Allocation 2011-2012 NRCan Allocation 2012-2013 NRCan Allocation 2013-2014
Salary $7,950 $7,950 $7,950 -- -- --
Employee Benefits   $1,590 $1,590 -- -- --
O&M $4,433 $4,433 $4,433 -- -- --
G&Cs $325,000 $325,000 $325,000 -- -- --
Accommodations   $1,034 $1,034 -- -- --
Total $340,006 $340,006 $340,007 -- -- --

Source: CAA International Actions Theme original program documents.

2.4 Expected Outcomes

The expected outcomes for the CAA International Actions Theme are presented in the logic modelFootnote4contained in Annex 3. The CAA International Actions Theme final expected outcomes are

3.0 Evaluation Design

3.1 Purpose and Scope

This evaluation was conducted to support funding renewal for the CAA International Actions Theme and to meet the coverage requirements of the Financial Administration Act and the Treasury Board Policy on Evaluation.

The evaluation focused on horizontal activities in ECCC and NRCan related to the CAA International Actions Theme and covered the activity streams detailed in Section 2.1. The theme also covered the related G&Cs to meet the requirements of the Financial Administration Act.

The evaluation covered the period from April 1, 2011, to June 30, 2014. Given that the current round of CAA International Actions Theme funding addresses the five-year period ending March 31, 2016, consideration was also given to the extent to which the program is on track to meet its 2015-2016 deliverables. The evaluation covered all assessed contributions that are part of the “International Climate Change Obligations” key area of activity. The evaluation did not examine G&Cs funded through the Fast-Start Financing Initiative, as these will be examined as part of another evaluation.

3.2 Evaluation Approach and Methodology

The following data collection methodologies were developed to address the evaluation issues and questions. Evidence gathered was then used to develop overall findings and conclusionsFootnote6.

Document review: An in-depth review of all relevant documents provided by ECCC and NRCan was conducted. Where gaps were identified or additional information was needed to supplement the evidence base, further requests for documents were made to the implicated departments. Documents were reviewed to identify the mandated requirements, goals and objectives, governance structure, authorities, activities, outputs and outcomes for each key area of activity. This data collection method contributed to addressing all evaluation questions.

Administrative data review: An in-depth review of departmental performance and financial data was also completed in order to determine the degree to which outcomes have been achieved and to assess the Theme’s economy and efficiency.

Key informant interviews: A total of 47 interviews were conducted with key informants identified by the departments involved in the CAA International Actions Theme. This included 6 preliminary interviews with internal stakeholders, followed by interviews with 6 internal program senior managers, 13 internal program managers and staff, 11 representatives of provincial/territorial governments, 5 industry and non-government organization stakeholders, and 6 international stakeholdersFootnote7.

Interviews were either conducted in person or by phone, according to the respondent’s preference and proximity to the National Capital Region. Interviews provided information on the relevance and performance of the program’s key areas of activity (i.e., effectiveness, efficiency and economy). All relevant stakeholder perspectives were considered to provide a balanced blend of views on program performance, with approximately 60% of interviewees external to the program and roughly 47% external to the implicated departments.

3.3 Limitations

The confidentiality of the UNFCCC negotiations, together wtih the direction provided by Cabinet to the Canadian delegation, somewhat constrained the evaluators’ ability to investigate the extent to which success in securing Canada’s stated interests in the Convention can be attributed directly or indirectly to efforts by the Government, as evaluators were not able to compare actual decisions made during international negotiations with Canada’s intended position prior to negotiations. As a result, the evaluation was limited in providing an independent perspective on the Theme’s performance, particularly how its negotiation activities influence the international negotiation process within and outside of the UNFCCC. External key informant interviews were used to fill in this data gap.

The diverse nature of the activities, units and staff involved in the CAA International Actions Theme also meant that most key informants were only able to speak to one piece of the larger picture. As such, it was challenging to concisely communicate the findings for such a diverse program, when stakeholders each only possessed a limited perspective on program functioning. This challenge was met by meticulously limiting key informant feedback to only the narrow set of program activities with which they were familiar, and disparate and varied views from informants were noted in the findings in order to reflect the various inputs received about different program areas.

4.0 Findings

This section presents the findings of this evaluation by evaluation issue (relevance and performance) and by the related evaluation questions.

For each evaluation question, a rating is provided based on a judgment of the evaluation findings. The rating statements and their significance are outlined below in Table 3. A summary of ratings for the evaluation issues and questions is presented in Annex 1.

Table 3. Definitions of Standard Rating Statements
Statement Definition
Acceptable The program has demonstrated that it has met expectations with respect to the issue area.
Opportunity for Improvement The program has demonstrated that it has made adequate progress to meet expectations with respect to the issue area, but continued improvement can still be made.
Attention Required The program has not demonstrated that it has made adequate progress to meet expectations with respect to the issue area and attention is needed on a priority basis.
Not applicable There is no expectation that the program would have addressed the evaluation issue.
Unable to assess Insufficient evidence is available to support a rating.

4.1 Relevance

4.1.1 Continued Need for Program

Evaluation Issue: Relevance Rating
1. Is there a continued need for the program? Acceptable

The evaluation found that international action is required in order to find comprehensive solutions to climate change as a complex global issue and to meet Canada’s international interests. Without the CAA International Actions Theme, significant gaps would emerge--most notably, a diminished influence on international climate change negotiations.

4.1.2 Alignment with Federal Government Priorities

Evaluation Issue: Relevance Rating
2. Is the program aligned with federal government priorities? Acceptable

The program is aligned with overall federal government priorities, as expressed in Speeches from the Throne and Budgets. The Theme contributes directly to both ECCC’s and NRCan’s strategic outcomes and addresses priorities and commitments related to engaging with international partners by participating in global climate change negotiations, meeting Canada's international obligations, and working with the U.S. to advance clean energy priorities through the CED.

4.1.3 Alignment with Federal Roles and Responsibilities

Evaluation Issue: Relevance Rating
3. Is the program consistent with federal roles and responsibilities? Acceptable

The program is consistent with federal roles and responsibilities for international environmental agreements. Provinces and territories have a shared interest in the outcomes of this work and can contribute to the implementation of such agreements given their shared jurisdiction over many areas of program activity.

4.2 Performance - Efficiency and Economy

4.2.1    Program Design

Evaluation Issue: Performance - Efficiency and Economy Rating
4. Is the program design appropriate for achieving its intended outcomes? Opportunity for Improvement

The program design is appropriate, with separately delivered key areas of activity that contribute to similar outcomes (e.g., the Clean Energy Dialogue). However, the overarching strategy that defines the mechanisms and processes by which the objectives of the CAA International Actions Theme are to be realized is not apparent to provincial, territorial and industry stakeholders, and there are further opportunities to showcase or profile Canadian achievements in international fora.

4.2.2    Program Governance

Evaluation Issue: Performance - Efficiency and Economy Rating
5. To what extent is the governance structure clear and appropriate for achieving expected results? Acceptable

For the most part, governance of the Theme is clear and appropriate. There are a variety of governance mechanisms for various components of the Theme, with clear collaboration mechanisms in particular between ECCC and NRCan.

4.2.3 Program Efficiency and Economy

Evaluation Issue: Performance - Efficiency and Economy Rating
6. Is the program undertaking specific activities and delivering products at the lowest possible cost? How could the efficiency of the program’s activities be improved? Are there alternative, more economical ways of delivering program outputs? Acceptable

The Theme’s activities under ECCC are deemed efficient given the level of expenditures, the additional activities undertaken (e.g., DFATD’s roles and CCAC) without commensurate funding, and the relatively low administrative costs to administer the assessed contributions.

Table 4: CAA International Actions Theme Budget and Expenditures for ECCC for Key Areas of Activity

Clean Energy Dialogue
  Budget $(1) 2011-2012 Actuals $(2) 2011-2012 Budget $(1) 2012-2013 Actuals $(2) 2012-2013 Budget $(1) 2013-2014 Actuals $(2) 2013-2014
Salary 295,010 269,983 387,851 280,062 416,333 419,025
O&M 330,327 301,032 346,656 286,183 346,920 163,721
G&Cs 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 625,337 571,015 734,507 566,245 763,253 582,746
Variance   54,322 (8,7%)   168,262 (2,9%)   180,507 (23,6%)
Negotiations
  Budget $(1) 2011-2012 Actuals $(2) 2011-2012 Budget $(1) 2012-2013 Actuals $(2) 2012-2013 Budget $(1) 2013-2014 Actuals $(2) 2013-2014
Salary 2,931,375 2,775,199 2,589,677 2,763,726 2,594,390 2,533,177
O&M 2,048,739 2,057,307 1,448,638 1,403,995 1,350,855 1,107,986
G&Cs 0 0 0 0 0 0
Variance   147,608 (3%)   129,406 (-3,2%)   304,082 (7,7%)
Obligations
  Budget $(1) 2011-2012 Actuals $(2) 2011-2012 Budget $(1) 2012-2013 Actuals $(2) 2012-2013 Budget $(1) 2013-2014 Actuals $(2) 2013-2014
Salary 7,450 7,450 7,450 7,450 7,950 7,950
O&M 4,433 4,433 4,433 4,433 4,433 4,433
G&Cs 307,585 307,585 312,308 306,233 315,806 315,805
Total 319,468 319,468 324,191 318,116 328,189 328,188
Variance   0 (0%)   6,075 (1,9%)   1 (0%)

Total
  Budget $(1) 2011-2012 Actuals $(2) 2011-2012 Budget $(1) 2012-2013 Actuals $(2) 2012-2013 Budget $(1) 2013-2014 Actuals $(2) 2013-2014
Clean Energy Dialogue 625,337 571,015 734,507 566,245 763,253 582,746
Negotiations 4,980,114 4,832,506 4,038,315 4,167,721 3,945,245 3,641,163
Obligations 319,468 319,468 324,191 318,116 328,189 328,188
Total 5,924,919 5,722,989 5,097,013 5,052,082 5,036,687 4,552,097
Variance   201,930 (3,4%)   44,931 (0,9%)   484,590 (9,6%)

Source: (1) ECCC CAA International Actions Theme program documents. These are revised budgets (1) and (2). The table excludes PWGSC accommodation allocation and employee benefits.

Table 5: CAA International Actions Theme Budget and Expenditures for Natural Resources Canada for Key Areas of Activity

Clean Energy Dialogue
  Budget 2011-2012 Actuals 2011-2012 Budget 2012-2013 Actuals 2012-2013 Budget 2012-2013 Actuals 2012-2013
Total 1,148,000 1,107,300 1,148,000 1,066,100 1,148,000 951,100
Variance   40,700 (3,5%)   81,900 (7,1%)   196,900 (17,2%)
Negotiations
  Budget 2011-2012 Actuals 2011-2012 Budget 2012-2013 Actuals 2012-2013 Budget 2013-2014 Actuals 2013-2014
Total 3,088,200 2,980,500 3,088,200 2,978,100 3,088,200 2,862,700
Variance   107,700 (3,5%)   110,100 (3,6%)   225,500 (7,3%)
Total
  Budget 2011-2012 Actuals 2011-2012 Budget 2012-2013 Actuals 2012-2013 Budget 2012-2013 Actuals 2012-2013
Totals 4,236,000 4,087,800 4,236,200 4,208,000 4,236,000 3,813,800
Variance   148,400 (3,5%)   192,000 (4,5%)   422,400 (10%)

Source: NRCan CAA International Actions Theme program documents. The table excludes PWGSC accommodation allocation and employee benefits.

4.2.4 Performance Measurement

Evaluation Issue: Performance - Efficiency and Economy Rating
7. Are performance data being collected and reported? If so, is this information being used to inform senior management / decision makers? Acceptable

Performance information is being regularly collected and publicly reported. Although performance targets were not identified, it would be difficult to define targets given the shared nature of the expected outcomes.

4.3 Performance - Effectiveness

Evaluation Issue: Performance - Effectiveness Rating
8. To what extent have intended outcomes been achieved as a result of the program? Acceptable

Overall, progress has been made toward the achievement of all expected outcomes.

(i) Direct outcome 1: Acceptable

Fulfilment of obligations that enable Canadian participation in international negotiations and contribute to the advancement of Canada’s climate change strategy.

Canada fulfilled its obligations by paying all pledged contributions and meeting reporting requirements over the evaluation period.

(ii) Direct outcome 2: Acceptable

Advancement of Canada’s climate change objectives in international engagement inside and outside the UNFCCC.

Canada is promoting its climate change interests through active participation in UNFCCC and other related international processes.

For ECCC:

For NRCan:

(iii) Direct outcome 3: Acceptable

Implementation of collaborative actions to advance clean energy technology and reduce GHG emissions.

Canada has worked with international partners to advance clean technologies through a number of initiatives such as the CEM and CED. These have increased clean energy collaboration between Canada and the U.S.

(iv) Intermediate outcome 1: Acceptable

International climate change agreements, statements, decisions and declarations are consistent with Canada’s objectives.

While negotiations are ongoing, there is evidence that the Government of Canada’s climate change objectives are being reflected in key UNFCCC agreements and decisions.

(v) Intermediate outcome 2: Acceptable

Sustained engagement with other countries, international organizations and the private sector on climate change and/or clean energy.

Canada is actively and increasingly engaged on climate change and, particularly, clean energy initiatives internationally.

(vi) Final outcome 1: Acceptable

International action to address climate change that is fair, effective and comprehensive.

Overall, the Theme is making progress toward engaging all countries to promote global emission reductions, which is how the government defines fair, effective and comprehensive international action. Performance information related to “fairness and effectiveness” is not expected until 2015-2016.

(vii) Final outcome 2: Acceptable

Innovation in clean energy resulting in global and domestic economic and environmental benefits.

While there is a great deal of evidence to suggest the program is pursuing activities that contribute to clean energy results, there is no direct evidence yet of the economic and environmental benefits of these investments.

5.0 Conclusions

There is a continued need for international action to find fair, effective and comprehensive solutions to the global challenges of climate change, and Canada has committed to working internationally to find solutions that meet Canada’s needs and maintain its interests. The CAA International Actions Theme is aligned with this need and, without it, Canada’s ability to influence international climate change negotiations would be highly compromised. Initiatives like the CED and CEM provide the primary conduit for Canada to accelerate collective progress toward a clean energy future.

The Theme contributes to promoting Canada’s climate change priorities regarding environmental protection and economic prosperity. While the program is consistent with federal roles and responsibilities for international environmental agreements, provinces and territories have a shared interest in the outcomes of this work. According to evaluation evidence, the CAA International Actions Theme is aligned with international commitments made by the federal government and the strategic outcomes of ECCC and NRCan.

The design of the CAA International Actions Theme, while appropriate for achieving its intended outcomes, is limited in its ability to identify Canadian successes and expertise and then leverage these internationally to promote Canadian achievements in international fora. Furthermore, provinces and territories desire deeper engagement with the federal government, would like to have their input solicited earlier and would like feedback on how their input was used when preparing federal positions. For the most part, the governance of the Theme is appropriate for the internal program components. A performance measurement framework exists for the Theme and performance information is being collected and is publicly available. Partners and stakeholders also reported that they were not aware of the departments’ overarching strategy for delivering on the Theme’s mandate.

The evaluation found that the Theme is being efficiently delivered, given the level of expenditures, the additional activities undertaken (i.e., DFATD’s roles, CCAC) without commensurate funding, and the relatively low administrative costs to administer the assessed contributions.

Evidence suggests that progress is being made in achieving the expected outcomes of the CAA International Actions Theme. Financial obligations have been met, ongoing participation in climate change negotiations and international fora has advanced Canada’s interests, and ongoing collaboration with the U.S. has furthered Canada’s clean energy interests. There have been noted successes in leadership/expertise related to the work on short-lived climate pollutants, clean energy and forests. However, the CAA International Actions Theme is impacted by a number of external factors that can influence long-term success.

6.0 Recommendations and Management Response

The following recommendations are provided to Environment and Climate Change Canada and Natural Resources Canada as the departments responsible for the CAA International Actions Theme of the CAA

Recommendation 1: Improve opportunities for provinces and territories to support the departments’ Clean Air International activities.
Despite continued engagement through such mechanisms as the broad federal/provincial/territorial working group on international climate change, as well as issue-specific mechanisms such as the National Forest Sinks Committee, many provincial and territorial representatives feel that engagement is insufficiently frequent or comprehensive, and they are unclear how their inputs to international negotiations are used. Consequently, sub-national and regional fora have been used by non-federal entities to engage internationally and influence climate change negotiations separately from the federal government. Given the role that provinces and territories play in climate change and clean energy, their engagement can help to articulate region specific issues and opportunities to more fully inform international positions. Existing mechanisms for engagement should be reviewed and strengthened and/or better communicated (as appropriate) so that provinces and territories have improved opportunity to support Clean Air International activities.

Management Response to Recommendation 1

Recommendation 1: Improve opportunities for provinces and territories to support the departments’ Clean Air International activities.
The Assistant Deputy Minister from Environment and Climate Change Canada (ADM, International Affairs Branch) agrees with the recommendation.

Management Action

Provinces and territories are an integral partner in implementing actions to meet international climate change commitments made by Canada to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Since 2010, Environment and Climate Change Canada has had formal engagement with provinces and territories and has operated based on the Terms of Reference (TORs) for engagement provided in Annex 1. For over a decade, NRCan / Canadian Forest Service has engaged frequently with provincial and territorial governments through the informal National Forest Sinks Committee on technical and policy issues related to land sector negotiations, forest-related greenhouse gas inventory estimation and accounting, and climate change mitigation analysis.

At the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) meeting on June 22- 23, 2015, Ministers agreed to establish a Climate Change Committee. This will formalize decisions between federal, provincial and territorial governments and a commitment has been made to enhance current engagement.

Environment and Climate Change Canada (International Affairs Branch) will continue to lead general discussions related to international actions, but other active Departments such as NRCan will be engaged when their respective areas of expertise (forests, technology) are to be discussed, and mechanisms to engage with provincial and territorial counterparts on energy issues will be explored. Technical level meetings (ad hoc processes) led by Environment and Climate Change Canada will continue to be managed separately by responsible Directorates within Environment and Climate Change Canada.

The Clean Energy Dialogue (CED) has engaged over 20 provincial energy and environment agencies in its work, including partnering on projects, sharing information, and participating in workshops and conferences. The CED will continue this engagement moving forward, should funding be available.

Timeline Deliverable(s) Accountability
  • Develop a proposed approach for CCME to integrate discussion in international actions (related to the Paris Climate Change Agreement). Date to be determined in the upcoming months.
  • Existing Terms of Reference (as per Annex 1) for FPT engagement to be updated between September 1, 2016, and June 30, 2017.
  • Terms of Reference of the CCME Climate Change Committee
  • Updated Terms of Reference for FPT engagement
  • ECCC - ADM, International Affairs Branch
  • ECCC - ADM, International Affairs Branch

Recommendation 2: Develop and communicate to stakeholders an overarching strategy that defines the mechanisms and processes by which the objectives of the CAA International Actions Theme are expected to be realized.
Despite the existence of a program logic model and various Government of Canada websites which list actions being taken internationally and domestically, there is no central communications tool for the Theme to communicate its strategy and objectives to partners and stakeholders. Provinces and territories, in particular, would find such information useful in understanding what is to be achieved through the CAA International Actions Theme, how this will affect them, and how they can best contribute.

Management Response to Recommendation 2

Recommendation 2: Develop and communicate to stakeholders an overarching strategy that defines the mechanisms and processes by which the objectives of the CAA International Actions Theme are expected to be realized.
The Assistant Deputy Minister from Environment and Climate Change Canada (ADM, International Affairs Branch) agrees with the recommendation.

Management Action

Environment and Climate Change Canada commits to developing an improved communication approach that will provide an overarching view of the program, including the elements that make up the program, the goals and objectives, and the expected outcomes where appropriate. This will be communicated to stakeholders, building on and to be delivered through existing mechanisms and channels. The information will be posted on ECCC’s website.

The CED strategic work plan will be integrated into the new communication approach.

Timeline Deliverable(s) Accountability
n effect as of April 1, 2017, pending renewal of the Clean Air Agenda’s international program
  • Development of a communications piece that lays out the Government’s overarching goals for the program, how it is delivered and its progress.
  • ECCC - ADM, International Affairs Branch

Recommendation 3: Identify ways to showcase the expertise and achievements of Canada’s public and private sectors in order to better support international actions and demonstrate that Canada is taking action and achieving results.
The evaluation identified that there were opportunities to better publicize domestic achievements to the international community in such areas as clean technology, climate change adaptation areas and Canada’s Forest Carbon Budget Model. The design of the CAA, with separate international and domestic Themes, means that it is sometimes challenging to share information across CAA program areas in order to profile domestic achievements in international fora.

Management Response to Recommendation 3

Recommendation 3: Identify ways to showcase Canada’s public-sector and private-sector achievements and expertise in order to better support international actions and demonstrate that Canada is taking action and achieving results.
The Assistant Deputy Ministers from Environment and Climate Change Canada (ADM, International Affairs Branch) and Natural Resources Canada (ADM, Energy Sector) agree with the recommendation and have developed a joint management response.

Management Action

Canada has significant expertise in both the public and private sectors, and has been active in showcasing these internationally as part of the program. Canada offers considerable expertise in areas such as Canada’s Forest Carbon Budget Model and clean energy technologies. Canada seeks to identify international opportunities for Canadian firms through a number of international initiatives, such as the Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN) and the Clean Energy Ministerial (CEM).

In addition, and to further showcase Canadian achievements and expertise under this program, Environment and Climate Change Canada will continue to work with NRCan and the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development (DFATD) to reinforce partnerships with other departments including Transport Canada and stakeholders, expand the network by using other related international fora and missions abroad, broaden the knowledge of Canadian achievements and expertise, and increase awareness of opportunities for those public and private sectors that are active internationally.

Timeline Deliverable(s) Accountability
  • Within one year after funding is renewed.
  • ECCC and NRCan will identify opportunities to showcase Canadian expertise and will work with DFATD, whether in NCR or missions abroad, to share such information.
  • ECCC, in consultation with NRCan and DFATD, will also identify opportunities as part of a comprehensive climate finance strategy.
  • ECCC - ADM, International Affairs Branch
  • NRCan, ADM, Energy Sector

Annex 1: Summary of FindingsFootnote37

Summary of Findings table (see description below)
Annex 1 description

Annex 1 consists of a table displaying a rating for each of the three evaluation questions related to relevance and the five evaluation questions related to performance that were addressed by the evaluation. Each question is given one of four ratings: Acceptable, Opportunity for Improvement, Attention Required or Not Applicable

Annex 2: Governance Structures for the CAA International Actions Theme

Annex 2.1 See discription below
Annex 2.1 description

The first presents the Director General (DG) Committee on International Actions, which is the overarching coordinating body for the Theme.
The committee is chaired by ECCC’s Director General of Climate Change International who is responsible for leading the implementation of the international actions theme under the CAA, and delivering Canada’s climate change negotiations and participation in international fora
The committee is also composed of the:

  • ECCC’s Director General of Science and Technology Strategies who is responsible for overseeing contributions made to the IPCC and IAI, and implementing the CED’s Clean Energy Research & Development and Energy Efficiency Working Group
  • ECCC”s Director General of the Americas who is responsible for overseeing the CED Secretariat
  • ECCC”s Director General of Bilateral and Multilateral Affairs whose participation is for information given Departmental role on International Affairs
  • NRCan’s Director General of Energy Policy / Energy Sector who is responsible for coordinating NRCan’s activities under this program, leading technology negotiations under the UNFCCC and Canada’s participation in the CEM
  • NRCan’s Director General of External Relations Science and Policy Integration who is responsible for overseeing the CED work being implemented under NRCan
  • NRCan’s Director General S&T Strategies who is responsible for implementing the CED’s Clean Energy Research and Development and Energy Efficiency Working Group
  • NRCan’s Director General of Policy, Economics and Industry / Canadian Forest Service who is responsible for overseeing the implementation of the forestry component of the program
Annex 2.2 see below for details
Annex 2.2 description

The second presents the governance structure for the Clean Energy Dialogue, which includes the CED Secretariat, CED NRCan Coordination, as well as three working groups: CCS, Electricity and R&D and Energy Efficiency.
The CED Secretariat is led by ECCC’s ADM, International Affairs Branch and supported by the DG, Americas Directorate and the Director, Canada-U.S. Relations.
The CED NRCan Coordination  is led by NRCan’s ADM Science and Policy Integration and supported by the DG, External Relations, Science and Policy Integration  and the Director, International Affairs, as well as the Deputy Director and a Senior Policy Advisor
The CCS Working Group is led by the DG, Strategic Science &Technology Branch, IET Sector NRCan.
The Electricity Working Group is led by the DG, Electricity Resources Branch, Energy Sector NRCan.
The R&D and Energy Efficiency Working Group is led by the DG, S&T Strategies, S&T Branch, ECCC, along with the DG, Strategic Science &Technology Branch, IET Sector NRCan and the DG, Office of Energy Efficiency, Energy Sector, NRCan.

Annex 3: Program Logic Model

Annex 3 see below for details
Annex 3 description

Annex 3 presents the Logic Model for the Clean Air Agenda International Actions Theme, and includes the key activities and outputs, as well as the immediate, intermediate and ultimate outcomes of the program.

Page details

Date modified: