Annual Report on the Administration of the Access to Information Act 2015-2016

Alternate formats

Large print, braille, MP3 (audio), e-text and DAISY formats are available on demand by ordering online or calling 1 800 O-Canada (1-800-622-6232). If you use a teletypewriter (TTY), call 1-800-926-9105.

On this page

Executive summary

Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC) is responsible for a range of programs and services that support Canadians throughout their lives—from school to work, from one job to another, from unemployment to employment and from the workforce to retirement.

The mission of ESDC, which includes the Labour Program and Service Canada, is to build a stronger, more competitive Canada, support Canadians in making choices that help them live productive and rewarding lives, and improve Canadians’ quality of life. It delivers programs and services directly to Canadians at over 615 points of service across Canada. ESDC serves the needs of millions of Canadians through multi-channel access points such as in-person services, on the Internet through web-based services and information, and via telephone through its network of call centres. With over 81.5 million annual visits to Service Canada’s website, Canadians are making a choice to interact with ESDC online.

The Access to Information Act (ATIA) and the Privacy Act establish legal rights for Canadian citizens and permanent residents to request and receive access to information in records held by the Government, while protecting the security and confidentiality of sensitive and personal information. Given the nature of services that ESDC provides, the Department receives a high number of access to information requests.

In the last few years, the Department has seen a substantial increase in the number of requests received, the number of pages reviewed and the complexity of requests received. In 2015–16, ESDC:

Despite this increase in volumes, the Department completed 82% of requests within legislated timeframes.
ESDC strongly believes in the right of access to government records in a timely manner, within the legislative provisions of the ATIA, and is always looking at ways to improve its performance. In 2015–16, the Department implemented its Access to Information Business Process Redesign (BPR). Although the BPR has led to greater efficiencies, improvements are ongoing. Additionally, in 2015–16 an internal audit to the access to information process was undertaken. Findings will be an opportunity to further improve access to information and privacy (ATIP) business processes.

Moving forward, the Department will continue to seek ways to educate, increase knowledge of and raise awareness about access to information and privacy. It will also seek opportunities to look at initiatives such as Open Government and Open Information to modernize its access to information practices and look at ways to make high-demand areas for information available more proactively.

1.0 Introduction

The Department of Employment and Social Development is pleased to present to Parliament its annual report on the administration of the Access to Information Act (ATIA) for the fiscal year 2015–16.

1.1 About the Access to Information Act

The purpose of the ATIA is to provide Canadian citizens and permanent residents with a right of access to information in records under the control of a government institution, subject to limited and specific exemptions and exclusions.

1.2 Section 72 requirement in the ATIA to report

Section 72 of the ATIA requires the head of every federal government institution to submit an annual report to Parliament on the administration of the Act following the close of each fiscal year. This report describes how ESDC fulfilled its access to information responsibilities during fiscal year 2015–16.

1.3 About Employment and Social Development Canada

The mission of Employment and Social Development Canada (ESDC), including the Labour Program and Service Canada, is to build a stronger and more competitive Canada, to support Canadians in making choices that help them live productive and rewarding lives, and to improve Canadians’ quality of life.

ESDC is one of the largest and most geographically distributed federal departments in the Government of Canada. Citizens and clients interact with ESDC on a daily basis through over 615 points of service across Canada. Each year, ESDC provides approximately $110 billion in benefits and payments to individuals, and supports millions of Canadians though its many programs and services. In 2015–16, this included:

ESDC delivers a range of programs and services that affect Canadians throughout their lives. The Department provides seniors with basic income security, supports unemployed workers, helps students finance their post-secondary education and assists parents who are raising young children. The Labour Program is responsible for labour laws and policies in federally regulated workplaces. Service Canada helps citizens access ESDC’s programs, as well as other Government of Canada programs and services.

1.4 Our ministers

The activities of ESDC are governed by federal legislation and reflected in the mandates of its three ministers:

The Honourable Jean-Yves Duclos is the Minister responsible for the purposes of  the Department of Employment and Social Development Act.

2.0 Access to Information at ESDC

2.1 Corporate Secretary and Chief Privacy Officer

The Corporate Secretary who also serves as ESDC’s Chief Privacy Officer is responsible for the administration of the ATIA at ESDC and is supported in that function by a Director of Access to Information and Privacy (ATIP) Operations who is also the Department’s designated ATIP Coordinator. The Chief Privacy Officer’s role is described in more detail in the Department’s Annual Report on the Administration of the Privacy Act.

Figure: Organizational chart
Organizational chart – Text description

This organizational chart displays a hierarchy beginning with the Corporate Secretary and Chief Privacy Officer of ESDC at the top. To the bottom, a dotted line leads to the Regional Operations that include Access to Information and Privacy Managers. Directly below the Chief Privacy Officer are two branches which lead respectively to the Privacy Management Division and to the Access to Information and Privacy Operations Division.

Under the first of these two branches are two further branches. One represents Privacy Compliance and Review Unit while the other represents the Policy, Planning and Coordination Unit. Under the second branch are the Request Processing Unit and the Incident Management and Legislative Disclosures Unit.

Note: More information about the privacy function at ESDC can be found in the Annual Report on the Administration of the Privacy Act 2015–16.

2.2 Access to Information and Privacy Operations Division

The Access to Information and Privacy Operations Division (ATIP Ops) carries out the Department’s legislated requirements under the ATIA, the Privacy Act and parts of the Department of Employment and Social Development Act. ATIP Ops leads and advises on the processing of all requests under the ATIA by managing requests for access to information in records in the control of ESDC, and is supported by program Liaison Officers (LOs) and Regional Access to Information and Privacy Managers. This work involves responding to requests from the public, performing a line-by-line review of records requested under the ATIA and the Privacy Act, as well as delivering training and awareness programs to employees with respect to the administration of the Acts. A great deal of the information in the control of the Department contains personal information about individuals and must be withheld under mandatory exemptions of the Act unless specified conditions are met.

The administration of the ATIA at ESDC is a collaborative effort between ATIP Ops at Headquarters and the Department’s network of LOs in the branches and Regional ATIP Managers across Canada, who facilitate the work by providing assistance in request processing, including undertaking searches, collecting records and making recommendations. The LOs also play a liaison role between ATIP analysts and subject matter experts.

Additionally, ATIP Ops is responsible for determining when incidents involving personal information constitute privacy breaches, responding to legal instruments, public interest disclosures and privacy complaints not related to the processing of Privacy Act requests. It also liaises with the Office of the Information Commissioner and the Office of the Privacy Commissioner regarding complaints received against the Department.

In 2015–16, resources dedicated to the ATI processing functions consisted of a team of about 16 employees (the number of employees fluctuated throughout the year). This includes a manager, ATIP officers and an Intake Unit. ESDC also has a network of ATI Liaison Officers within all program areas that are responsible for searching and retrieving relevant records. These resources are not included in this total.

2.3 Regional operations

The Department has a network of LOs in the branches as well as Regional ATIP Managers who facilitate the work by providing expert Access to Information Act and Privacy Act advice and guidance directly to program areas within the regions, in consultation with ATIP Ops.

3.0 Access to Information Delegation Order

Section 73 of the Access to Information Act and section 11 of the Department of Employment and Social Development Act empower the head of the institution to delegate any of the powers, duties or functions assigned to him or her by those Acts to employees of the institution. The Delegation Order found in Annex A outlines the delegations that were in effect as of June 3, 2015.

The Delegation Order can be found in Annex A.

4.0 Summary of Key Data

The Statistical Report on the Access to Information Act for 2015–16 can be found in Annex B.

During the reporting period, ESDC observed a significant increase in the number of requests received, the number of pages processed and the complexity of the requests that were reviewed. In 2015–16, ESDC received 1,572 requests for information, which represents an increase of over 35% from the previous year. Additionally, the Department processed more than one and a half times the number of pages than the number of pages in 2014–15, yet completed 1,178 (82%) of requests within legislated timeframes.

The key data are presented in the summary table below (figure 1). The subsequent tables provide more detailed information.

Figure 1 – Summary of key data
Details 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016
Formal requests received under the Access to Information Act 861 1,160 1,572
Requests completed during the reporting period 932 1,055 1,439
Number of pages processed 101,577 139,549 257,249
Number of requests completed within legislated timeframes 845 799 1,178
Number of requests completed beyond legislated timeframes 87 256 261
Proportion of requests that were responded to within legislated time frames according to Information Commissioner’s standards 91% 76% 82%
Complaints to the Information Commissioner 38* 29 42

* In the Annual Report on the Administration of the Access to Information Act 2015–16, 29 complaints were reported for the 2013–14 fiscal year; however, 38 complaints were reported in the 2013–14 annual report.

4.1 Requests received and completed under the ATIA

In 2015–16, the Department received 1,572 requests under the ATIA. It is the second year in a row that ESDC has received a year-over-year increase of about 35% in requests for information. Despite this increase, the Department completed 1,439 requests in 2015–16 and managed to maintain a compliance rate of 82%.

Figure 2 - Request received and completed under the Access to Information Act
Figure 2 – Text description
Year Received Completed
2013-2014 861 932
2014-2015 1,160 1,055
2015-2016 1,572 1,439

4.2 Requests by calendar days taken to complete

Over the past three fiscal years, the majority of requests have been completed within 30 calendar days. In 2015–16, 787 requests, or more than half (55%) of requests, were responded to within the first 30 days.

Figure 3 – Requests by calendar days taken to complete
Figure 3 – Text description
Year 30 jours civils 31 à 60 jours civils 61 jours civils ou plus
2013-2014 388 273 212
2014-2015 447 312 296
2015-2016 787 352 300

4.3 Timeframes

In 2015-16, the Department was able to meet legislated timelines for 1,178 requests made under the ATIA. Despite an increase in the number of requests received and the number of pages processed, the majority of requests were completed within legislated timeframes—with a compliance rate of 82%. ESDC was unable to meet legislated timelines for 261 requests during the reporting year.

Figure 4 – Number of requests processed within legislated timeframes and number of requests completed beyond legislated timeframes
Figure 4 – Text description
Year Late On time
2013-2014 87 845 (91%)
2014-2015 256 799 (76%)
2015-2016 261 1,178 (82%)

Note: Requests reported as completed “on time” include requests for which an extension was granted.

4.4 Pages processed and disclosed

In 2015–16, the Department observed a further significant increase in the number of pages processed, from about 100,000 in 2013–14 to over 250,000 during the reporting period.

Figure 5 – Number of pages processed and number of pages disclosed
Figure 5 - Text description
Year Processed Disclosed
2013-2014 101,577 87,116
2014-2015 139,549 121,801
2015-2016 257,249 216,929

4.5 Sources of requests

In 2015–16, the most common source of requests was from the general public (492), followed by businesses/private sector (395) and media (257). Close to one fifth (304) of requesters declined to identify themselves.

Figure 6 – Sources of request – Number of requests and percentage of total
Source Nombre de demandes et pourcentage du total
2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016
Media 154 (18%) 156 (13%) 257 (16%)
Academia 5 (1 %) 14 (1%) 19 (1%)
Business/private sector 203 (24%) 436 (38%) 395 (25%)
Organization 187 (22%) 220 (19%) 105 (7%)
Public 312 (36%) 286 (25%) 492 (31%)
Decline to identify s.o.* 48 (4%) 304 (19%)

* This category was introduced in 2014-2015.

4.6 Exemptions and exclusions

While the Act gives a right of access to records held by government institutions, information within these records may be withheld by applying limited and specific exemptions. The following table outlines the most frequently invoked exemptions during the past three fiscal years.

Figure 7 – Exemptions and exclusions – Number of requests and percentage of total
Section 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016
19 (personal information) 368 (31%) 347 (31 %) 405 (29%)
16 (law enforcement and investigations) 155 (13%) 214 (19%) 193 (14%)
21 (advice and recommendations) 225 (19%) 202 (18%) 247 (18%)
20 (third party information) 239 (20%) 174 (15%) 170 (12%)
23 (solicitor-client privilege) 63 (5%) 45 (4%) 48 (3%)

The Act allows for the exclusion of certain types of information from its application, specifically records that are already available to the public (section 68) and confidences of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada (section 69), which require consultation with the Department of Justice. In 2015–16, ESDC excluded records based on section 69 of the ATIA in a total of 70 requests.

4.7 Consultations received from other Government of Canada institutions and other organizations

In 2015–16, EDSC responded to 170 requests for consultation from other Government of Canada institutions and organizations, corresponding to a review of an additional 5,360 pages. For 115 requests (68%) for consultation, the Department was able to respond within 30 days. More than half (104 or 61%) resulted in a recommendation to disclose the records entirely.

5.0 Training and awareness activities

ESDC has a comprehensive mandatory online training strategy to educate, increase knowledge of and raise awareness about the stewardship of information and effective workplace behaviours. The Department also offers online training on privacy and access to information to foster a common understanding of the proper management of information resources, ensuring that the privacy of information is respected, and to improve timeliness and compliance results.

Since the release of the mandatory online Stewardship of Information and Effective Workplace Behaviours training program in 2013–14, 24,147 employees have successfully completed the mandatory online training course (including 1,678 employees in 2015–16). In addition, the online training module Privacy and Access to Information – It’s Everybody’s Business, successfully trained 3,098 employees (including 1,742 employees in 2015–16).

Figure: Online training
Online training figure – Text description
Details Stewardship of Information and Effective Workplace Behaviours Privacy and Access to Information – It’s everybody’s Business
2013-2014 8,669 Not Available
2014-2015 13,800 1,356
2015-2016 1,678 1,742
Figure: In-person employee training
In-person employee training figure – Text description
Details Training Sessions Employees Trained
2013-2014 37 838
2014-2015 37 1,120
2015-2016 48 1,131

The Department has undertaken a number of activities to educate and increase knowledge of access to information and privacy, such as regular meetings with liaison officers and in-person training sessions. Since 2013–14, the Department delivered 122 in-person sessions to 3,083 employees. In 2015–16, ESDC delivered 48 in-person sessions to 1,131 employees.

6.0 New or revised policies, guidelines and procedures

During the 2015–16 fiscal year, ATIP Ops received 35% more requests for information than during the preceding fiscal year, and reviewed 84% more pages without a corresponding increase in resources.

The Department is always looking to improve its performance standards and to find ways to address the persistent increase in volume, size and complexity of ATIP requests. In order to do so, the Department undertook a Business Process Redesign (BPR) to simplify and improve processes and ensure quality responses are provided in a timely manner, which was implemented in 2015. Although the BPR has led to greater efficiencies through better use of technology, the introduction of standards for greater consistency, as well as the introduction of Advance Release Notifications as an additional measure of quality control, more work needs to be done to meet the increasing demand for government-held records.

In 2015–16 an internal audit of the Access to Information Process was undertaken. Findings will be used to further improve ATIP business processes.

On March 31, 2015, a Federal Court decision was made to waive all search fees for electronic documents, although search fees could still apply for non-electronic records. Search fees reported in the statistical report are for requests made during previous years or for non-electronic records.

7.0 Complaints, investigations and court action

7.1 Complaints received

The Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC) notified EDSC of 42 complaints during 2015–16. The following table outlines the complaints by category.

Figure 8 – Number of complaints received
Denial of access Unreasonable time extensions Processing delays Exemptions applied improperly
17 3 6 16

7.2 Complaints closed

During the reporting period, ATIP Ops also managed to close 42 outstanding complaints, either carried over from previous years or from 2015–16. The following table outlines the OIC’s findings.

Figure 9 – Number of complaints closed
Well founded Not well founded Discontinued Resolved
28 3 7 4

7.3 Court action

In April 2015, the Office of the Information Commissioner submitted to the Federal Court an application for judicial review following a complaint related to the processing of an ATIA request that had been received in 2006. The complaint was related to the alleged improper application of section 23 of the ATIA (solicitor-client privilege).

In January 2016, the Federal Court rendered its judgment. The judgment led to the disclosure of portions of the request but also maintained that portions were subject to solicitor-client privilege. As the application of section 23 is assessed on a case-by-case basis, the judgement does not have an impact on the way ESDC deals with information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege exemptions.

Federal Court docket: T-840-15
Citation: 2016 FC 36

8.0 Timeframe monitoring at ESDC

Except for certain circumstances that allow for claiming extensions, the ATIA contains a statutory timeline of 30 calendar days (about 20 working days) for responding to requests. The Department is committed to respecting this legislated timeframe and has implemented a number of business processes to monitor the time to process requests. The Business Process Redesign (BPR) has been oriented to process ATIP requests within 20 business days as effectively as possible. The BPR also introduced Advance Release Notifications as an additional way to monitor upcoming releases. Additionally, a number of training and ATIP awareness sessions have been delivered to stress the importance of timely ATIP processing. The Department also prepares a weekly “look ahead” report that provides an overview of upcoming releases to senior officials and a quarterly report that captures key ATIP processing performance indicators.

Annex A: Delegation order

Employment and Social Development Canada

The Minister of Employment and Social Development, pursuant to section 18 of the Department of Employment and Social Development Act, hereby designates the persons, officers or employees holding the positions with Employment and Social Development Canada set out in the schedules attached hereto, or the persons, officers or employees occupying on an acting basis those positions, to exercise the powers or perform the duties or functions of the Minister or to exercise or perform the powers, duties or functions of the head of the institution, as specified in the attached schedules.

(Signed by)
Pierre Poilievre
Minister of Employment and Social Development
Date: June 3, 2015

Access to Information Act – Delegation of authority

Employment and Social Development Canada

Description Section Deputy Minister ESDC Deputy Minister Labour Senior Associate Deputy Minister / Chief Operating Officer for Service Canada Associate Deputy Minister ESDC Corporate Secretary ESDC Director ATIP Ops NHQ Manager ATIP Processing NHQ ATIP Officers NHQ*
Responsibility of government institutions 4(2.1) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Notice where access requested 7(a) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Giving access to record 7(b) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Transfer of request to another government inst. 8(1) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Extension of time limits 9 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Payment of additional fees 11(2) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Payment of fees for EDP record 11(3) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Deposit 11(4) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Notice of fee payment 11(5) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Waiver of refund of fees 11(6) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Language of access 12(2)(b) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Access to alternate format 12(3)(b) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Refuse access – Obtained in confidence 13 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Refuse access – Federal-provincial affairs 14 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Refuse access – International affairs and defence 15 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Refuse access – Law enforcement,  investigations 16 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Refuse access – Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act 16.5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Refuse access – Safety of individuals 17 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Refuse access – Economic Interests of Canada 18 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Refuse access – Economic interest of the Canada Post Corporation, Export Development Canada, the Public Sector Pension Investment Board and VIA Rail Canada Inc. 18.1 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Refuse access – Personal information 19 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Refuse access – Third party information 20 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Refuse access – Operations of Government 21 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Refuse access – Testing procedures, tests, audits 22 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Refuse access – Audit working papers and draft audit reports 22.1 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Refuse access – Solicitor-client privilege 23 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Refuse access – Statutory prohibitions 24 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Severability 25 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Information to be published 26 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Third party notification 27(1) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Third party notification – Extension of time limit 27(4) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Third party notification – Notice of decision 28(1)(b) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Third party notification – Representations in writing 28(2) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Third party notification – Disclosure of record 28(4) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Where the Information Commissioner recommends disclosure 29(1) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Advising Information Commissioner of third party involvement 33 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Right to make representations 35(2)(b) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Access to be given to complainant 37(4) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Notice to third party (application to Federal Court) 43(1) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Notice to applicant (application to Federal Court by third party) 44(2) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Special rules for hearings 52(2)(b) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Ex parte representations (Federal Court) 52(3) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Facilities for inspection of manuals 71(1) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Annual report to Parliament 72 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No

*ATIP Officers: Officers within the Access to Information and Privacy Operations Division, NHQ, at the PM-04 and PM-05 levels

Regulations

Description Section Deputy Minister ESDC Deputy Minister Labour Senior Associate Deputy Minister / Chief Operating Officer for Service Canada Associate Deputy Minister ESDC Corporate Secretary ESDC Director ATIP Ops NHQ Manager ATIP Processing NHQ ATIP Officers NHQ*
Transfer of request 6(1) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Search and preparation of fees 7(2) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Production and programming fees 7(3) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Providing access to records 8 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No
Limitations in respect of format 8.1 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No

*ATIP Officers: Officers within the Access to Information and Privacy Operations Division, NHQ, at the PM-04 and PM-05 levels

Annex B: Statistical report on the Access to Information Act

Name of institution: Employment and Social Development Canada
Reporting period: 2015-04-01 to 2016-03-31

Part 1: Requests under the Access to Information Act

1.1 Number of requests

Details Number of requests
Received during reporting period 1572
Outstanding from previous reporting period 246
Total 1818
Closed during reporting period 1439
Carried over to next reporting period 379

1.2 Sources of requests

Source Number of requests
Media 257
Academia 19
Business (private sector) 395
Organization 105
Public 492
Decline to Identify 304
Total 1572

1.3 Informal requests

Completion time 1 to 15 days 16 to 30 days 31 to 60 days 61 to 120 days 121 to 180 days 181 to 365 days More than 365 days Total
Requests 172 117 64 21 0 0 1 375

Note: All requests previously recorded as “treated informally” will now be accounted for in this section only.

Part 2: Requests closed during the reporting period

2.1 Disposition and completion time

Disposition of requests Completion time
1 to 15 days 16 to 30 days 31 to 60 days 61 to 120 days 121 to 180 days 181 to 365 days More than 365 days Total
All disclosed 50 197 106 48 4 3 0 408
Disclosed in part 27 221 195 113 26 30 32 644
All exempted 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 3
All excluded 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 4
No records exist 16 92 39 1 1 0 1 150
Request transferred 35 5 0 0 0 0 0 40
Request abandoned 113 28 12 8 1 11 17 190
Neither confirmed nor denied 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 241 546 352 172 33 45 50 1,439

2.2 Exemptions

Section Number of requests
13(1)(a) 4
13(1)(b) 2
13(1)(c) 10
13(1)(d) 2
13(1)(e) 0
14 34
14(a) 12
14(b) 9
15(1) 13
15(1) - International Affairs 14
15(1) - Defence of Canada 14
15(1) - Subversive Activities 0
16(1)(a)(i) 0
16(1)(a)(ii) 0
16(1)(a)(iii) 0
16(1)(b) 4
16(1)(c) 29
16(1)(d) 0
16(2) 149
16(2)(a) 1
16(2)(b) 3
16(2)(c) 7
16(3) 0
16.1(1)(a) 0
16.1(1)(b) 0
16.1(1)(c) 0
16.1(1)(d) 0
16.2(1) 0
16.3 0
16.4(1)(a) 0
16.4(1)(b) 0
16.5 0
17 2
18(a) 1
18(b) 0
18(c) 0
18(d) 0
18.1(1)(a) 0
18.1(1)(b) 0
18.1(1)(c) 0
18.1(1)(d) 0
19(1) 405
20(1)(a) 1
20(1)(b) 87
20(1)(b.1) 1
20(1)(c) 73
20(1)(d) 8
20.1 0
20.2 0
20.4 0
21(1)(a) 103
21(1)(b) 112
21(1)(c) 21
21(1)(d) 11
22 17
22.1(1) 17
23 48
24(1) 170
26 5

2.3 Exclusions

Section Number of requests
68(a) 2
68(b) 0
68(c) 0
68.1 0
68.2(a) 0
68.2(b) 0
69(1) 2
69(1)(a) 6
69(1)(b) 2
69(1)(c) 2
69(1)(d) 6
69(1)(e) 12
69(1)(f) 3
69(1)(g) re (a) 10
69(1)(g) re (b) 0
69(1)(g) re (c) 11
69(1)(g) re (d) 5
69(1)(g) re (e) 3
69(1)(g) re (f) 8
69.1(1) 0

2.4 Format of information released

Disposition Paper Electronic Other formats
All disclosed 363 45 0
Disclosed in part 493 151 0
Total 856 196 0

2.5 Complexity

2.5.1 Relevant pages processed and disclosed
Disposition of requests Number of pages processed Number of pages disclosed Number of requests
All disclosed 23092 16445 408
Disclosed in part 223462 194069 644
All exempted 52 0 3
All excluded 2197 0 4
Request abandoned 8446 6415 190
Neither confirmed nor denied 0 0 0
2.5.2 Relevant pages processed and disclosed by size of requests
Disposition Less than 100 pages processed 101-500 pages processed 501-1000 pages processed 1001-5000 pages processed More than 5000 pages processed
number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed
All disclosed 357 4646 45 7603 4 2369 2 1827 0 0
Disclosed in part 394 12772 179 36873 36 21720 28 51659 7 71045
All exempted 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
All excluded 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0
Request abandoned 176 301 8 966 4 1999 2 3149 0 0
Neither confirmed nor denied 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 932 17719 232 45442 45 26088 33 56635 7 71045
2.5.3 Other complexities
Disposition Consultation required Assessment of fees Legal advice sought Other Total
All disclosed 33 2 0 0 35
Disclosed in part 105 15 0 0 120
All exempted 1 0 0 0 1
All excluded 2 0 0 0 2
Request abandoned 19 5 0 0 24
Neither confirmed nor denied 0 0 0 0 0
Total 160 22 0 0 182

2.6 Deemed refusals

2.6.1 Reasons for not meeting statutory deadline
Number of requests closed past the statutory deadline Principal reason
Workload External consultation Internal consultation Other
261 189 24 4 44
2.6.2 Number of days past deadline
Number of days past deadline Number of requests past deadline where no extension was taken Number of requests past deadline where an extension was taken Total
1 to 15 days 47 34 81
16 to 30 days 22 11 33
31 to 60 days 18 19 37
61 to 120 days 15 16 31
121  to 180 days 3 12 15
181 to 365 days 4 33 37
More than 365 days 2 25 27
Total 111 150 261

2.7 Requests for translation

Translation requests Accepted Refused Total
English to french 0 0 0
French to english 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0

Part 3: Extensions

3.1 Reasons for extensions and disposition of requests

Disposition of requests where an extension was taken 9(1)(a) interference with operations 9(1)(b) consultation 9(1)(c) third-party notice
Section 69 Other
All disclosed 48 3 24 1
Disclosed in part 181 12 61 6
All exempted 0 1 0 0
All excluded 1 1 1 0
No records exist 3 0 1 0
Request abandoned 33 2 11 4
Total 266 19 98 11

3.2 Length of extensions

Length of extensions 9(1)(a) interference with operations 9(1)(b) consultation 9(1)(c) third-party notice
Section 69 Other
30 days or less 161 2 21 1
31 to 60 days 43 7 47 6
61 to 120 days 48 10 26 4
121 to 180 days 11 0 3 0
181 to 365 days 3 0 1 0
365 days or more 0 0 0 0
Total 266 19 98 11

Part 4: Fees

Fee type Fee collected Fee waived or refunded
Number of requests Amount Number of requests Amount
Application 1,295 $6,480 143 $715
Search 15 $6,992 3 $5,020
Production 0 $0 0 $0
Programming 0 $0 2 $40
Preparation 0 $0 0 $0
Alternative format 0 $0 0 $0
Reproduction 0 $0 0 $0
Total 1310 $13,472 148 $5,775

Part 5: Consultations received from other institutions and organizations

5.1 Consultations received from other Government of Canada institutions and organizations

Consultations Other Government of Canada institutions Number of pages to review Other organizations Number of pages to review
Received during reporting period 160 5013 3 344
Outstanding from the previous reporting period 22 165 0 0
Total 182 5178 3 344
Closed during the reporting period 167 5019 3 344
Pending at the end of the reporting period 15 159 0 0

5.2 Recommendations and completion time for consultations received from other Government of Canada institutions

Recommendation Number of days required to complete consultation requests
1 to 15 days 16 to 30 days 31 to 60 days 61 to 120 days 121 to 180 days 181 to 365 days More than 365 days Total
Disclose entirely 38 41 22 1 0 0 0 102
Disclose in part 5 20 20 2 1 1 0 49
Exempt entirely 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3
Exclude entirely 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Consult other institution 2 0 3 0 0 1 0 6
Other 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 7
Total 48 65 48 3 1 2 0 167

5.3 Recommendations and completion time for consultations received from other organizations

Recommendation Number of days required to complete consultation requests
1 to 15 days 16 to 30 days 31 to 60 days 61 to 120 days 121 to 180 days 181 to 365 days More than 365 days Total
Disclose entirely 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Disclose in part 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
Exempt entirely 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Exclude entirely 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Consult other institution 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 3

Part 6: Completion time of consultations on cabinet confidences

6.1 Requests with Legal Services

Number of days Fewer than 100 pages processed 101-500 pages processed 501-1000 pages processed 1001-5000 pages processed More than 5000 pages processed
Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed Number of requests Pages disclosed
1 to 15 5 8 0 0 0 0 1 1672 0 0
16 to 30 11 369 1 260 0 0 0 0 0 0
31 to 60 2 46 1 435 0 0 0 0 0 0
61 to 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
121 to 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
181 to 365 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
More than 365 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 18 423 2 695 0 0 1 1672 0 0

6.2 Requests with Privy Council Office

Number of Days Fewer Than 100 Pages Processed 101‒500 Pages Processed 501-1000 Pages Processed 1001-5000 Pages Processed More Than 5000 Pages Processed
Number of Requests Pages Disclosed Number of Requests Pages Disclosed Number of Requests Pages Disclosed Number of Requests Pages Disclosed Number of Requests Pages Disclosed
1 to 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
16 to 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
31 to 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
61 to 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
121 to 180 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
181 to 365 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
More than 365 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Part 7: Complaints and investigations

Section 32 Section 35 Section 37 Total
42 0 42 84

Part 8: Court action

Section 41 Section 42 Section 44 Total
0 1 0 0

Part 9: Resources related to the Access to Information Act

9.1 Costs

Expenditures Amount
Salaries $1,051,884
Overtime $30,049
Goods and Services
  • Professional services contracts = $74,735
  • Other = $12,668
$87,403
Total $1,169,336

9.2 Human resources

Resources Person years dedicated to access to information activities
Full-time employees 12.60
Part-time and casual employees 2.28
Regional staff 0.00
Consultants and agency personnel 0.39
Students 0.16
Total 15.43

Note: Enter values to two decimal places.

Page details

Date modified: