Men Offenders' Trajectories to Security Threat Group (STG) Affiliation

Research Highlights: Marginalization factors were most likely to be recorded for STG affiliated men, followed by childhood adversity and social network information.

Why we did this study

A brief literature review identified social networks, marginalization, and childhood adversity as three primary trajectoriesFootnote 1  to Security Threat Group (STG) affiliation.Footnote 2 ,Footnote 3 ,Footnote 4  This study was conducted to explore available information related to federal men offenders' STG affiliation trajectories.

Publication

What we did

In total, 5% (n = 200) of STG affiliated offenders were selected for coding; STG members or key players were selected for all coding cases.Footnote 5 ,Footnote 6  Using a detailed coding manual, case management documentation was analyzed from the Offender Management System (OMS) to identify indicators related to the three primary trajectory domains. The relevant coded information was not available for all offenders in OMS. Therefore, when more than 5% of offenders had missing information for a specific indicator, the proportion with available information was identified.

What we found

Most menFootnote 7  (86%) were STG involved prior to federal incarceration and 83% indicated playing a central role in their STG pre-incarceration. These findings were consistent across ethnocultural groups, carceral status (in-custody or in the community), and STG subgroups.Footnote 8  Motivational factors for STG affiliation were provided for 29% of men. Among those identified, money, a sense of belonging/community and family/community norms, were indicated.

Social networks: Over half of men reported having a STG social network connection; 17% with STG involved family members, typically siblings or cousins, and 2% with a STG involved partner. Fifty percent of men had STG affiliated friends, although this information was not recorded for almost one-quarter of men. Comparisons across ethnocultural groups showed that Indigenous (57%) and Black (63%) men were more likely to have STG affiliated friends and family affiliations was highest for Indigenous men (30%).

Marginalization: Eighty-seven percent of men had at least one of these factors: unemployment, homelessness, street life,Footnote 9  or substance use history. Most prominent was a history of unemployment (82%), followed by 54% involved in street life, 53% with a substance use history, and 13% who experienced homelessness. Higher proportions of Indigenous and Black men had these indicators.

Childhood adversity: Childhood adversity factors were reported for 59% of men and included abuse, family fragmentation, and foster care history. Overall, 31% of men reported abuse histories. Among these men, physical (79%), sexual (48%), and psychological (34%) abuse were most prevalent. Also, 44% of men reported experiencing family fragmentation and 27% had a history of foster care. All of these indicators were more prevalent for Indigenous men as well as for men in-custody during the study period.

What it means

These results provide a preliminary examination of trajectories to STG affiliation for federal men offenders; however, gaps in the reporting of these indicators was evident. Enhancing the Correctional Service of Canada's ability to track and utilize STG information would require a standardized reporting process. Understanding trajectories to STG affiliation may inform intervention strategies and identify additional need areas, particularly with respect to initiatives targeting STG disengagement. Future qualitative research may also further expand our knowledge of men's trajectories to STG affiliation.

For more information   

For questions and/or more information, please email the Research Branch. You can also visit the Research Publications section for a full list of reports and one-page summaries.

Prepared by: Sarah Cram and Shanna Farrell MacDonald

Page details

Date modified: